General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDefense attorney explains why Steve Bannon didn't testify
cnn
David Schoen, Steve Bannon's lawyer, told the court Thursday that the former Trump aide did not testify in his own defense because he was unable to use various reasons his attorneys tried to argue in the trial but were not allowed under the law.
""The defendant Mr. Bannon understands he has the right to testify on his own behalf, and he has very much wanted to do so since the day he was indicted," Schoen said."
However, Bannon would not be able to be "telling the true facts" if he took the stand, Schoen added, citing Bannon's belief that his lawyer advised him not to testify after former President Donald Trump raised the possibility of asserting executive privilege in a letter to him.
That lawyer for Bannon, Robert Costello, didn't testify as a defense witness for the same reasons, Schoen said.
Bannon confirmed for the judge that he wouldn't testify.
"Yes, your honor," he said, standing halfway up to address the court when asked if he was waiving his right.
snip
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/steve-bannon-trial-contempt-congress-07-21-22/index.html
Beachnutt
(8,909 posts)I can't get up there and lie my ass off so I won't testify..
montanacowboy
(6,714 posts)outside the courtroom or on his podcast
but nothing to say in a court of law
fucking chicken shit loudmouth fucker
elleng
(141,926 posts)kentuck
(115,406 posts)Sorry.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)That doesnt sound very medieval.
Walleye
(44,805 posts)Response to Beachnutt (Original post)
oregonjen This message was self-deleted by its author.
KPN
(17,377 posts)Would it be a mistrial? He waived his right.
RobertDevereaux
(2,037 posts)Botany
(77,323 posts)perjury
Turbineguy
(40,074 posts)he'd have to lie.
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)Anybody who uses the phrase "true facts" is a liar.
PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)"However, Bannon would not be able to be "telling the true facts" if he took the stand, Schoen added, citing Bannon's belief that his lawyer advised him not to testify after former President Donald Trump raised the possibility of asserting executive privilege in a letter to him.
That lawyer for Bannon, Robert Costello, didn't testify as a defense witness for the same reasons, Schoen said."
Now my question is, is Schoen stating to the "telling the true facts" are facts that the Judge has already ruled that could they could not be used as a defense? To me, it sounds like Schoen is deliberately trying to mislead the jury.