Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What more evidence is needed??? (Original Post) Texasgal Jul 2022 OP
Inciting a riot. Records violations. underpants Jul 2022 #1
I'm just flummoxed! Texasgal Jul 2022 #2
I suspect that they are going for (no pun intended) "bulletproof" charges. usonian Jul 2022 #3

usonian

(27,182 posts)
3. I suspect that they are going for (no pun intended) "bulletproof" charges.
Fri Jul 22, 2022, 12:59 AM
Jul 2022

Records retention, mishandling and destruction are killers.

This is from a guy who sat through countless security lectures in the aerospace industry. It's GD serious business, and here's the laugher (which ain't funny at all)

We were all really conscientious engineers, loyal to a fault, and endured those lectures, which weren't really needed. We just did the right thing in all cases.

The people who were selling the documents in large part were the ones who knew their value on the black market, namely the high level "custodians" who delivered the lectures.

This varies, of course, but big fish are always a better catch than the sardines.

Coverups ALWAYS involve screwing with records.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What more evidence is nee...