General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToday is the first day that Nate Silver has ranked the odds of Senate control at 50:50
The January 6th hearings, horrible Supreme Court decisions, and strong Democratic candidates in swing states are starting to create some momentum. Hopefully, it can mushroom.
https://fivethirtyeight.com
Woodswalker
(549 posts)Results. The timing of the last three in September is ideal
msongs
(74,203 posts)AdamGG
(1,897 posts)Geopolitics is nasty, but had to focus on priorities.
Funtatlaguy
(11,892 posts)All currently seated Dems will be re-elected which includes the supposedly 4 tossups of: NH,NM,AZ,GA.
We will flip 3-4 GOP held seats out of these 6 competitive races in: PA, WISC, OH, NC, FLA, IOWA.
We will however lose the House and GOP will have a 220-215 advantage.
You should take these predictions with just one grain of salt and bet on them in Vegas accordingly.
PortTack
(35,824 posts)Silver came to political prominence in 2008, when his aggregations of election polls produced an impressive predictive model that called that years national elections with remarkable accuracy. In subsequent years, he and his organization, FiveThirtyEight, have produced inconsistent results: an inaccurate muck-up of 2010 elections in the U.K.; an accurate prediction of the 2012 results in the U.S.; and a wildly incorrect take on the 2016 elections that he continues to attempt to retcon into an impressive showing by claiming he was slightly less overconfident about a Donald Trump loss than everybody else...gave HRC a 94% chance of winning 7 days b4 the election.
Increasingly, one suspects that despite his claims to analytical rigor, at some very basic level, Silver does not actually know what a poll is. He is not alone in this; a fair portion of the countrys political punditry and opinion-making class is equally misinformed. In their conception, polls of opinion and sentiment represent not a snapshot of the present as informed by the past, but rather a hazy but prescient view into the future; not a measurement, but a prediction. [Y]ou can actually write down what will happen in the future, with as much confidence as you write down the history of the past. Because its science! This is why so much media discourse around polling emphasizes a framework that paints polls of present attitudes as a form of absolute constraint on where sentiment will go. Increasingly, one suspects that despite his claims to analytical rigor, at some very basic level, Silver does not actually know what a poll is. He is not alone in this; a fair portion of the countrys political punditry and opinion-making class is equally misinformed. In their conception, polls of opinion and sentiment represent not a snapshot of the present as informed by the past, but rather a hazy but prescient view into the future; not a measurement, but a prediction. [Y]ou can actually write down what will happen in the future, with as much confidence as you write down the history of the past. Because its science! This is why so much media discourse around polling emphasizes a framework that paints polls of present attitudes as a form of absolute constraint on where sentiment will go.
This is an interesting read
more at the link
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/10/30/nate-silver-making-he-goes
AdamGG
(1,897 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.