General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLauren Boebert Says Same-Sex Marriage Bill 'Undermined Masculinity'
Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert has said the same-sex marriage bill that passed the House last week "undermined masculinity."...
Boebert slammed the legislation as an "assault on America's traditional values" on Kirk's podcast.
"I think the federal government should not be involved in marriage," she said. "My marriage between my husband is really between me and God, not between me and the government. But this was absolutely unnecessary. They have attacked our institutions. They have weakened the nuclear family and undermined masculinity and even femininity."...
https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boebert-samesex-marriage-bill-undermine-masculinity-turning-point-1727556
Link to tweet
Oh, Bobo.
milestogo
(23,193 posts)Going to Canada
(169 posts)She needs to take the log out of her own eye!
FoxNewsSucks
(11,913 posts)like having a husband who shows his dick to underage girls.
dchill
(42,660 posts)area51
(12,752 posts)Ohio Joe
(21,898 posts)I wonder why they impact her
Aristus
(72,514 posts)in existence.
The biggest is between that hamhock's ears.
What a staggeringly, jaw-droppingly stupid simulacrum of a female human being...
GoCubsGo
(34,996 posts)is sitting right next to her. It's Dumber and Dumbest.
Wingus Dingus
(9,173 posts)tblue37
(68,448 posts)Haggard Celine
(17,911 posts)I think she's just an ugly piece of trash.
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,978 posts)She cannot do that because it does NOT affect mine in the way she thinks. She has no case.
eShirl
(20,421 posts)viva la
(4,636 posts)"My marriage between my husband and me is really between me and the teen girls he exposes himself to in bowling alleys. Oh, and God."
Between her and "Christian nationalist" Greene and "Feminists are ugly" Gaetz, I feel like we're back in the middle ages, where life was "nasty, brutal, and short," which does describe Boebert and Greene, for sure.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)To find a new find a new dead horse to whip. This idea of rolling back freedoms has yet to prove its worth as a campaign tool. Im betting its a long term loser.
Ilsa
(64,563 posts)get through reversing our societal gains over the last 100 years, they'll start attacking diets, cultural preferences, etc. "That Ethiopian restaurant is offensive to American Christian values!"
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Is too chilling and I expect to hearing it come out of some candidates mouth in this election cycle.
sanatanadharma
(4,090 posts)So take away all her government special-class citizen tax perks, etcetera.
Caliman73
(11,767 posts)That would be what follows from "the government should not be involved in marriage". If they want to take the legality out of marriage and let it be simply a religious thing then we would lose the tax benefits and other protections offered to married people and not to single people.
The 14th Amendment is about equal protection under the law. An argument that conservatives have been using recently is "There is no right to (name your cause) in the Constitution." Recently Ben Shapiro said, "There is no right for a man and man or woman and woman to get married" Well Ben, there is no right for a man and woman to get married in the Constitution either. So, at this point, if a man and woman can get legally married, and there are special protections under law for that legal marriage, then guess what, the 14th provides for consenting same sex couples to be married and receive those same protections.
Emile
(43,235 posts)Seriously, you would have to be one big dumb ass to listen to her advice.
brush
(61,033 posts)to stop making public pronouncements as they only remind people of how stupid they are.
No one cares about her marriage or pervert husband.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)things like last wills, custody of children, incarceration of mentally impaired, record birth certificates etc. You do want your estate to be enforced per your will, don't you? And you do want your children to prove citizenship with a birth certificate, don't you.
sop
(19,274 posts)CousinIT
(12,742 posts)
nuxvomica
(14,195 posts)Does that ever enter their minds? Does anything?
relayerbob
(7,449 posts)We already know the answer to the last one
Botany
(77,842 posts)... the right and right wing social media platforms and it is a totally made up meme from cobbled together factoids.
"They" used to say white manhood is under attack but that was a little too racist so now it is just manhood. I
have lost some good friends to this nonsense. As near as can tell my friends were getting their information from
entities like Hillsdale College, The Daily Caller, something call the Hetrodox Academy, facebook, hate talk radio,
and God knows where else.
Boebert is just repeating a right wing talking point that is being pushed because reality is toxic to the right.
moose65
(3,463 posts)As a gay man, I can assure her that there are millions of masculine gay men.
Meadowoak
(6,606 posts)And I also know plenty of effeminate men that are perceived as gay that are straight married men with children.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)At least they didnt attack a weaker opponent this time.
Theyre so dumb.
live love laugh
(16,479 posts)relayerbob
(7,449 posts)would be those men who are really unsure of their "masculinity" in the first place. Maybe they should a -come out of the closet, or b - learn how to be normal so they are no longer incels (depending on what their actual orientation is behind all the masks and false bravado).
RAB910
(4,030 posts)to celebrate some sort of perceived advantage by robbing Americans of their basic civil rights
Norbert
(7,851 posts)Shut up, oh dim one.
Blue Owl
(59,610 posts)He sounds like a real catch -- I bet he tells her exactly what to do...
Duncan Grant
(8,938 posts)Where did they ever learn to communicate like this? Hmm
GoCubsGo
(34,996 posts)The most stupid member of Congress meets the dumbest podcaster in the Universe. Not going to waste my time listening to these two idiots.
FSogol
(47,664 posts)masculinity.
Ms. Toad
(38,814 posts)You can have a ceremonial marriage in the church of your choice - and then it truly would have been between you and God.
Once you take that ceremonial marriage and register it with the state, it ALSO becomes essentially a 3-party contract with the state, from which you (and any other married couple) benefit.
It is just fine if your church doesn't want to marry same-gender couples. But it isn't fine when you exclude same gender couples from the legal benefits that registering with the state provides.