Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI live in Indiana and on the local news they interviewed a Right to Life person.
This is what I posted on my Facebook page. I included her response and after is my response. My guess the person based on info online about her is she is about 30 years old.
Abigail Lorenzen made the following statement on WANE 15 tonite. She is the Operations & Media Director at Right to Life of Northeast Indiana.
"We want legislators to see, look, in America we're innovative people. We find solutions for things. We don't look at a crisis and say Well, I guess the only solution is to kill one of the people in it. That's not who America is. Look at all the things we've invented. We can find a solution for this too."
My rebuttal to the above "genius".
My rebuttal to the above "genius".
She states America has innovative people, yet in its history, it has not found a solution. It has not found a solution in America since the time the Pilgrims set foot in America in 1620. And the Pilgrims were okay with abortions.
By the way, herbs and other means have been used to do an abortion since the beginning of time as described in the Old Testament.
The Catholic Church has been around since 590, over 1,400 years ago, and they have not come up with a so-called solution. I would suggest that she should blame her god for failing to provide her a solution.
It is an important issue to her and she has not found a solution nor has her group initiated any research effort to make it happen. Has she or anyone in her organization funded research for this? Most likely not.
What exactly does she think the solution would be? There are only two basic options. Have the abortion or force the girl/woman to complete the pregnancy.
With her statement criticizing the "solution" is to kill one of the people in it. Yet, she is okay with killing the pregnant woman.
This girl. And she should be considered a girl considering her immaturity about the information she is trying to justify her belief.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1412 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I live in Indiana and on the local news they interviewed a Right to Life person. (Original Post)
LiberalFighter
Jul 2022
OP
Walleye
(31,056 posts)1. Yes Abigail, we are innovative. That's why we will find clever ways around these stupid laws
Sky Jewels
(7,139 posts)2. And hopefully destroy the GOP and the current SCOTUS in the process.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)3. She would have also been ok with killing Native Americans.
Shes a GD hypocrite. Killing them would have been her solution.
Marcus IM
(2,228 posts)4. Ummm. The SCOTUS just took away one of those innovations!