Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCNN: The inside story of how John Roberts failed to save abortion rights
The article seems to be a long form attempt to put lipstick on a pig but did include some interesting "relationship" tidbits.
The inside story of how John Roberts failed to save abortion rights
By Joan Biskupic, CNN legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer
Updated 7:53 AM ET, Tue July 26, 2022
(CNN)Chief Justice John Roberts privately lobbied fellow conservatives to save the constitutional right to abortion down to the bitter end, but May's unprecedented leak of a draft opinion reversing Roe v. Wade made the effort all but impossible, multiple sources familiar with negotiations told CNN. It appears unlikely that Roberts' best prospect -- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -- was ever close to switching his earlier vote, despite Roberts' attempts that continued through the final weeks of the session.
New details obtained by CNN provide insight into the high-stakes internal abortion-rights drama that intensified in late April when justices first learned the draft opinion would soon be published. Serious conflicts over the fate of the 1973 Roe were then accompanied by tensions over an investigation into the source of the leak that included obtaining cell phone data from law clerks and some permanent court employees.
In the past, Roberts himself has switched his vote, or persuaded others to do so, toward middle-ground, institutionalist outcomes, such as saving the Affordable Care Act. It's a pattern that has generated suspicion among some right-wing justices and conservatives outside the court.Multiple sources told CNN that Roberts' overtures this spring, particularly to Kavanaugh, raised fears among conservatives and hope among liberals that the chief could change the outcome in the most closely watched case in decades.
Once the draft was published by Politico, conservatives pressed their colleagues to try to hasten release of the final decision, lest anything suddenly threaten their majority.Roberts' persuasive efforts, difficult even from the start, were thwarted by the sudden public nature of the state of play. He can usually work in private, seeking and offering concessions, without anyone beyond the court knowing how he or other individual justices have voted or what they may be writing.
(snip)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/26/politics/supreme-court-john-roberts-abortion-dobbs/index.html
By Joan Biskupic, CNN legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer
Updated 7:53 AM ET, Tue July 26, 2022
(CNN)Chief Justice John Roberts privately lobbied fellow conservatives to save the constitutional right to abortion down to the bitter end, but May's unprecedented leak of a draft opinion reversing Roe v. Wade made the effort all but impossible, multiple sources familiar with negotiations told CNN. It appears unlikely that Roberts' best prospect -- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -- was ever close to switching his earlier vote, despite Roberts' attempts that continued through the final weeks of the session.
New details obtained by CNN provide insight into the high-stakes internal abortion-rights drama that intensified in late April when justices first learned the draft opinion would soon be published. Serious conflicts over the fate of the 1973 Roe were then accompanied by tensions over an investigation into the source of the leak that included obtaining cell phone data from law clerks and some permanent court employees.
In the past, Roberts himself has switched his vote, or persuaded others to do so, toward middle-ground, institutionalist outcomes, such as saving the Affordable Care Act. It's a pattern that has generated suspicion among some right-wing justices and conservatives outside the court.Multiple sources told CNN that Roberts' overtures this spring, particularly to Kavanaugh, raised fears among conservatives and hope among liberals that the chief could change the outcome in the most closely watched case in decades.
Once the draft was published by Politico, conservatives pressed their colleagues to try to hasten release of the final decision, lest anything suddenly threaten their majority.Roberts' persuasive efforts, difficult even from the start, were thwarted by the sudden public nature of the state of play. He can usually work in private, seeking and offering concessions, without anyone beyond the court knowing how he or other individual justices have voted or what they may be writing.
(snip)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/26/politics/supreme-court-john-roberts-abortion-dobbs/index.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1041 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN: The inside story of how John Roberts failed to save abortion rights (Original Post)
BumRushDaShow
Jul 2022
OP
Seems like after the leak, the conservative justices were just trying to 'save face' IMHO.
riversedge
Jul 2022
#1
This pretty much confirms that the leak came from a conservative justice.
Bleacher Creature
Jul 2022
#5
riversedge
(70,304 posts)1. Seems like after the leak, the conservative justices were just trying to 'save face' IMHO.
dalton99a
(81,590 posts)2. "A serious jolt to the legal system" since 2000
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,424 posts)3. Shit on the Subverted Court and the Subversive 6.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,563 posts)4. Roberts failed to save the reputation of the SCOTUS
Polybius
(15,481 posts)9. True
I don't put much blame on him though, since no one could have convinced the other 5 to change their votes.
Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)5. This pretty much confirms that the leak came from a conservative justice.
It was, as expected, a move to lock in five votes.
peggysue2
(10,839 posts)6. Yes!
All the accusations of a liberal leak was gross subterfuge.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)7. Thomas or Alito.
One of those two scumbags.
Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)8. Yep, and Kavanaugh was just he target.
He was wavering and the leak made it clear that if he voted "no" everyone would know that he changed his mind.
Nevilledog
(51,198 posts)10. My opinion of this story:
v