General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCNN: The inside story of how John Roberts failed to save abortion rights
The article seems to be a long form attempt to put lipstick on a pig but did include some interesting "relationship" tidbits.
By Joan Biskupic, CNN legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer
Updated 7:53 AM ET, Tue July 26, 2022
(CNN)Chief Justice John Roberts privately lobbied fellow conservatives to save the constitutional right to abortion down to the bitter end, but May's unprecedented leak of a draft opinion reversing Roe v. Wade made the effort all but impossible, multiple sources familiar with negotiations told CNN. It appears unlikely that Roberts' best prospect -- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -- was ever close to switching his earlier vote, despite Roberts' attempts that continued through the final weeks of the session.
New details obtained by CNN provide insight into the high-stakes internal abortion-rights drama that intensified in late April when justices first learned the draft opinion would soon be published. Serious conflicts over the fate of the 1973 Roe were then accompanied by tensions over an investigation into the source of the leak that included obtaining cell phone data from law clerks and some permanent court employees.
In the past, Roberts himself has switched his vote, or persuaded others to do so, toward middle-ground, institutionalist outcomes, such as saving the Affordable Care Act. It's a pattern that has generated suspicion among some right-wing justices and conservatives outside the court.Multiple sources told CNN that Roberts' overtures this spring, particularly to Kavanaugh, raised fears among conservatives and hope among liberals that the chief could change the outcome in the most closely watched case in decades.
Once the draft was published by Politico, conservatives pressed their colleagues to try to hasten release of the final decision, lest anything suddenly threaten their majority.Roberts' persuasive efforts, difficult even from the start, were thwarted by the sudden public nature of the state of play. He can usually work in private, seeking and offering concessions, without anyone beyond the court knowing how he or other individual justices have voted or what they may be writing.
(snip)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/26/politics/supreme-court-john-roberts-abortion-dobbs/index.html
riversedge
(81,549 posts)dalton99a
(95,317 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(182,091 posts)Polybius
(22,120 posts)I don't put much blame on him though, since no one could have convinced the other 5 to change their votes.
Bleacher Creature
(11,504 posts)It was, as expected, a move to lock in five votes.
peggysue2
(12,597 posts)All the accusations of a liberal leak was gross subterfuge.
roamer65
(37,974 posts)One of those two scumbags.
Bleacher Creature
(11,504 posts)He was wavering and the leak made it clear that if he voted "no" everyone would know that he changed his mind.
Nevilledog
(55,137 posts)
v
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.