General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBank of America memo hopes workers' conditions worsen
https://theintercept.com/2022/07/29/bank-of-america-worker-conditions-worse/A BANK OF AMERICA executive stated that we hope working Americans will lose leverage in the labor market in a recent private memo obtained by The Intercept. Making predictions for clients about the U.S. economy over the next several years, the memo also noted that changes in the percentage of Americans seeking jobs should help push up the unemployment rate. The memo, a Mid-year review from June 17, was written by Ethan Harris, the head of global economics research for the corporations investment banking arm, Bank of America Securities. Its specific aspiration: By the end of next year, we hope the ratio of job openings to unemployed is down to the more normal highs of the last business cycle.
Snip
What the memo calls the ratio of job openings to unemployed is generally calculated the other way around i.e., the ratio of unemployed people to job openings. The more widely used ratio offers one measurement of the balance of power between workers and employers. The lower this number, the more options unemployed people have when searching for work and the greater opportunities employed people have to switch to jobs with better pay and conditions. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, this ratio stood at 0.5 as of May, meaning that there were then two job openings per unemployed person.
In 2009 at the worst moments of the economic calamity that followed the collapse of the housing bubble during the end of the George W. Bush administration the ratio climbed as high as 6.5, so there were more than six unemployed workers for each open job. It then slowly declined over the next decade, reaching 0.8 in February 2020 before Covid-19 lockdowns began
Snip
The memo is an uncanny demonstration that the economist Adam Smith was right when he described the politics of inflation in his famed 1776 work, The Wealth of Nations.. High profits tend much more to raise the price of work than high wages, Smith argued. Our merchants and master-manufacturers complain much of the bad effects of high wages in raising the price. They say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits. They are silent with regard to the pernicious effects of their own gains. They complain only of those of other people. Thus, exactly as Smith would have predicted, Bank of America complains loudly about the bad effects of high wages in raising prices, but appears to be silent about the pernicious effects of high profits.
Snip
dalton99a
(81,392 posts)Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)The c word.
Gaugamela
(2,495 posts)Big industry constantly requires a reserve army of unemployed workers for times of overproduction. The main purpose of the bourgeois in relation to the worker is, of course, to have the commodity labour as cheaply as possible, which is only possible when the supply of this commodity is as large as possible in relation to the demand for it, i.e., when the overpopulation is the greatest. Overpopulation is therefore in the interest of the bourgeoisie, and it gives the workers good advice which it knows to be impossible to carry out.
Karl Marx
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_army_of_labour
This also explains their rabid opposition to abortion.
live love laugh
(13,079 posts)Ive often wondered why the companies are so greedy that with record profits they barely want to pay minimum wages.
Its suddenly clear that if people make living wages the demand for jobs, and thus the labor pool, will decrease.
(Sometimes it takes a minute but when I get it I get it. )
Gaugamela
(2,495 posts)well off who is going to paint the rich mans yacht? Property begins to deteriorate. Before you know it everyone is equal again. Cant have that.
live love laugh
(13,079 posts)Ziggysmom
(3,394 posts)Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)sakabatou
(42,136 posts)live love laugh
(13,079 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 31, 2022, 02:41 AM - Edit history (1)
Corporations everywhere are in the same boatjuggling stockholder profit expectations with increased labor shortage costs.
multigraincracker
(32,641 posts)that a lack of regulation would lead to monopolies that would upset the "free market" and cause inflation.
Time to break up the large banks like Bank of America if it's not too late already.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,250 posts)House of Roberts
(5,162 posts)Roughly 300,000 reach retirement age each month. Even if all don't retire, enough are ceasing to work, but remaining consumers, to maintain demand for goods and services, with a smaller percentage of workers to fill the gap. This is a demographic shift that was always going to happen, and explains why the oppressor class wants the retirement age raised to keep workers forced to remain in the labor force.
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)... covid or during covid heavy US death years than CDC is reporting
Amishman
(5,554 posts)Modern HR practices are built on the idea that employees are easily replaceable / disposable. This attitude has worked to maximize profits due to the employee / employer balance of power skewed in favor of the latter for more than a generation. The baby boom generation size shifted more of the population into the prime working age ranges.
Baby boomer retirement is peaking, and Gen Z is a far smaller cohort. That labor glut is ending, and corporate leverage is vanishing with it.
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)Amishman
(5,554 posts)Mandatory profit sharing with workers, as well as requiring all stock buybacks and executive bonuses be matched with bonus payments to non executives.
Also a progressive tax on corporate profits, based on company net worth. Part of the problem is big companies have economies of scale that small businesses do not. Make the big guys carry a heavier tax load while giving smaller businesses a break.
Also tougher rules against overuse of contractors and offshoring.