General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolitico: Dems lose a chunk of their drug bill...
Senate Parliamentarian ruled that 60 votes would be needed to pass the provision that provided penalties to drugmakers who raised prescription prices higher than inflation. Affects 'scrips from private insurors and Medicare.
(Who said Senate majority leaders makes the rules?)
(2 hours ago)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dems-lose-key-piece-of-health-agenda-in-spending-bill/ar-AA10nwSG?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=421681d31c134753bc9d798815582212
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Phoenix61
(18,827 posts)Call is pay back for the bs the repukes pulled putting Barrett on the USSC weeks before the election.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Interesting political philosophy there.
Phoenix61
(18,827 posts)them from passing legislation? Im not saying fire her which is what the repubs did. In 2001, Trent Lott fired Robert Dove, the Senate parliamentarian, after Dove refused to allow Republican spending measures under the Byrd Rule. https://www.governing.com/context/the-history-of-congressional-parliamentarians-and-why-they-matter
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)And I think its hypocrisy to criticize Republicans for doing it if we do it when convenient.
Phoenix61
(18,827 posts)any interest in governing. The are obstructionists. They dont want to participate in the process fine. Well do it without them. The parliamentarian is an advisory position. I think a polite, thank you for you opinion, then pass what we want. What we have been doing is rewarding them for bad behavior. Its like giving a two year old a cookie every time they tantrum then whining that they are always throwing tantrums.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Who ignore rules and do what you want. Got it.
Phoenix61
(18,827 posts)can do about that.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Was Lott right to fire the Parliamentarian to force his bill through? If not, why should Dems do it.
Phoenix61
(18,827 posts)nothing I can say that will help you to.
Deminpenn
(17,501 posts)Well said, especially the point about the parlimentarian being an advisory position. The only drawback might be if one of more Dem senators felt ignoring the parlimentarian would be against the "traditions" of the Senate.
AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)It is rare but it is in the rules.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Excellent role model there.
AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)Who campaigned on picking a VP to overrule the parliamentarian to give you an idea of who my political role models are.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)As a campaign point?
kcr
(15,522 posts)I mean, if you insist, but this isn't a two wrongs don't make a right situation. This is a fight or roll over and die situation. If that's okay with you, you can speak for yourself and be comforted in the fact that at least you stuck to your principles while the world burns. But know that eventually you will be moved out of the way.
triron
(22,240 posts)dalton99a
(94,101 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)She was appointed by Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Irish_Dem
(81,197 posts)Had to go.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Fixed it for you.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,602 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)To start screaming for Dems to do the same.
duckworth969
(1,348 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)based on the population.
budkin
(6,849 posts)Fuck the parliamentarian.