General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump apparently "leaked" the warrant to Breitbart with agents' names deliberately unredacted
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
FelineOverlord
(3,851 posts)superpatriotman
(6,819 posts)And that includes bin Laden and Tojo.
PatSeg
(52,560 posts)and we may never know how much damage he has done. I'm sure we'll be hearing details for years to come.
FelineOverlord
(3,851 posts)Tickle
(4,131 posts)Midnight Writer
(25,206 posts)He will leak for convenience, he will leak for profit, he will leak for revenge, he will leak just to get people talking about him.
Raven123
(7,651 posts)Then when he did they criticize him. Did anyone really expect him to redact it? I think not. I doubt that he even thought about it. He is vindictive, but even more he is careless. Im afraid this falls under the be careful what you wish for category. The only way around this potential outcome would have been to give his lawyers a redacted copy, which I doubt is legal.
ok_cpu
(2,238 posts)he definitely doesn't get enough benefit of the doubt while struggling to get his side of things out in the world.
Raven123
(7,651 posts)Just confused that people who exhorted him to release the warrant didnt have the foresight to see what might happen. Didnt read it here. Didnt see/hear it anywhere else.
pandr32
(13,935 posts)Such a waste of flesh and bone he is. NOTHING good has come of his life.
Walleye
(44,055 posts)The Espionage Act. I think thats the news out of this, never mind the names of the FBI agents. You can expect that shit
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Irish_Dem
(80,416 posts)Sociopaths or narcissists who are cornered can become more dangerous than usual.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)If the names were not redacted when Trump's lawyer received it, then DOJ doesn't think its an issue, or its legally part of the Warrant, and would be included in the version DOJ will prospectively release.
