General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHe has committed TRE45ON
Proof will certainly be revealed. Our justice system must hold him accountable. The bribe money and death threats will only keep him afloat for so long. This AG cannot be bought imo...
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)without congress first declaring war (assuming you are referring to the 'aid and comfort' clause).
mzmolly
(52,559 posts)
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)If not, then no, this is not treason as defined by US law.
mzmolly
(52,559 posts)would be guilty of war crimes.
If I can show you collusion with the proud boys and others, to attack the capital - that should suffice.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)waging war upon the US.
mzmolly
(52,559 posts)does.
BidenRocks
(2,629 posts)The last declared war was WWII.
What will America look like under a dictatorship?
They want it now, but.......
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,784 posts)But Trump has not committed, nor will he be charged with, the crime of Treason.
Enemies is a narrowly defined term, referring only to countries the US has declared war on.
The Rosenbergs, who gave nuclear secrets to Russia, werent charged with treason, they were charged with espionage.
Espionage and seditious conspiracy are the two most serious charges Trump is possibly at risk of being charged with.
Iwasthere
(3,461 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,784 posts)As the charge would be dismissed.
Justice doesnt work that way; DOJ charges crimes they can convict.
mzmolly
(52,559 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 21, 2022, 08:54 PM - Edit history (1)
enemies. Anyone trying to overthrow democracy, should fit the definition.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)mzmolly
(52,559 posts)kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)Mariana
(15,610 posts)Therefore, nothing in that applies to him. Espionage, on the other hand...
Iwasthere
(3,461 posts)kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)Mariana
(15,610 posts)we can think about charging people with treason for helping them.
Kid Berwyn
(22,553 posts)Seeing how they have declared war on the United States of America, they are traitors.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)in that? I would LOVE to find such evidence .....
dpibel
(3,746 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 21, 2022, 07:51 PM - Edit history (1)
I think you're overlooking it.
"Levies war against or..."
I don't think anyone will get far arguing that Jan 6 was levying war.
But your belief that treason as defined requires a declaration of war by the United States does not square with the plain language of the statute.
Just by way of example: The Confederates who fired on Fort Sumter committed treason the instant they did so. There was, at that time, no declaration of war on the part of the United States.
triron
(22,240 posts)But it clearly doesn't require a declared war. See Glenn kirschners video below. 9
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)I was simply asking for a link to that declaration .....
dpibel
(3,746 posts)But the statute does not require a declaration, does it?
The statute requires levying war, not declaring it.
Else it would be a cool loophole for traitors, no? "Sure, I massed an army and attacked US positions. But we never declared war!"
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)levying war and even more debatable if President Trump was directly involved in it (for sure he was not an active participant).
Response to kelly1mm (Reply #25)
dpibel This message was self-deleted by its author.
dpibel
(3,746 posts)Me, post 16:
"I don't think anyone will get far arguing that Jan 6 was levying war."
My point is that you, and many others, seem to focus in on the enemy portion of the statute and ignore the levying war.
Carry on with whatever it is you're trying to teach the lesser mortals.
Joinfortmill
(19,761 posts)moonshinegnomie
(3,791 posts)RobertDevereaux
(2,019 posts)scipan
(2,964 posts)1. Assembled an armed mob
2. To overthrow the government
And/or
3. (Paraphrased) to stop laws from being executed
= Treason
Delarage
(2,510 posts)GuppyGal
(1,748 posts)indeed