Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 04:51 PM Aug 2022

Frank Figliuzzi on MSNBC: Finally someone backs up what I have been saying.

He said the DOJ/FBI failed to secure those top secret documents in a timely manner. He also said they were slow in getting the warrant.

That's why I have so angry in my recent posts. Even after they learned Trump was lying to them it took weeks before they got a warrant. I instantly recognized this was not handled well. You don't take your time when some of the most top secret documents in our country are at risk. You act immediately.

They learned there were secret documents in January and you spend months negotiating with someone you know you can't trust. Please give us back the secret documents that are sitting there insecure. How many times did they ask Trump for those documents? It was more than once.

92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frank Figliuzzi on MSNBC: Finally someone backs up what I have been saying. (Original Post) fightforfreedom Aug 2022 OP
Also Figluizzi: Classified for Capital aeromanKC Aug 2022 #1
Commonsense says, Hell yes. fightforfreedom Aug 2022 #4
Finally! He and A.B. Stoddard stopped walking on eggshells and went there. oregonjen Aug 2022 #7
+1000 aeromanKC Aug 2022 #8
And a big who cares. Going after a former president is not the same thing as going after the Demsrule86 Aug 2022 #59
On January 20, 2021, at 12:00, he returned to ordinary citizen status. Justice matters. Aug 2022 #81
It should be exactly the same. No person is above the law. I will comfortable in your ignore pile. Handler Aug 2022 #88
Remarkable quote from former FBI guy. Kid Berwyn Aug 2022 #24
He wants to use them to make money. calimary Aug 2022 #28
+1. Excellent comments. Where have they been indeed. yonder Aug 2022 #31
One thing DENVERPOPS Aug 2022 #85
They weren't shy about "clouds and shadows" over Hillary Clinton Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2022 #32
Or as negotiable get out of jail free cards. I'm tired of the theatre. A Dem would have been in jail Evolve Dammit Aug 2022 #34
Here he is, in 2017, revealing secrets to the Russians in the Oval. CrispyQ Aug 2022 #79
Right you are. I think he will also use them to leverage power. Which would equal money I suppose. Handler Aug 2022 #89
Can we stop being patient now? FoxNewsSucks Aug 2022 #2
Let's wait and see. Ask again later. dchill Aug 2022 #15
...and remember They_Live Aug 2022 #16
Dryer than a popcorn fart! dchill Aug 2022 #40
Eh, nobody gets to tell us whether to be patient or not. ShazzieB Aug 2022 #30
Well put, Shazzie RussBLib Aug 2022 #39
Reality Winner. One fucking document. Four years. nt Autumn Aug 2022 #57
What was the classification of that one document? DBoon Aug 2022 #61
And, the most they could do was suggest a better padlock? Frustratedlady Aug 2022 #3
Exactly, Can you please put on a better padlock. fightforfreedom Aug 2022 #5
That was Kash Patel's job assignment,... magicarpet Aug 2022 #12
precisely tishaLA Aug 2022 #38
That was Kash Patel's job assignment,... magicarpet Aug 2022 #13
+1, uponit7771 Aug 2022 #82
I wish Frank had been asked if he thought other Trump properties should be searched. If Vinca Aug 2022 #6
I think Rebl2 Aug 2022 #11
Did Figliuzzi criticize DOJ for waiting 15 mos to indict Joshua Schulte for espionage? Nt Fiendish Thingy Aug 2022 #9
We'd all be dancing in the streets if they took action 15 months after the theft of the documents. Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #46
That is a good point. Hi how are you? Demsrule86 Aug 2022 #58
The timeline: onenote Aug 2022 #10
Excellent timeline Alice Kramden Aug 2022 #18
Thank you! Thoughtfully laid out important information. . . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2022 #19
I have no doubt the DOJ was investigating the stolen documents. fightforfreedom Aug 2022 #23
And what would have happened if they searched his residence and came up empty? tinrobot Aug 2022 #27
Totally agree. Saboburns Aug 2022 #41
Once again: WHY did NARA not know the documents were missing for a year? HOW did Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #48
How would NARA know? onenote Aug 2022 #50
You're missing a major point. It is important. Saboburns Aug 2022 #64
Those most secure documents are supposed to be moved only under rigorous security conditions and Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #71
You're still not getting it. Saboburns Aug 2022 #76
So you're thinking it was a sting and for some reason Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #80
You're right. The DOJ/FBI was too lenient with the crooked... brush Aug 2022 #14
Dig Her Up!! FB47243 Aug 2022 #17
+1000 Goodheart Aug 2022 #20
Might Trump have been the subject of a wire tap or other surveillance during the lag period? Mr. Ected Aug 2022 #21
I've been thinking the same thing. wnylib Aug 2022 #43
Me too! Saboburns Aug 2022 #63
It's the only scenario in which the presence of those documents in a hotel basement for 18 months is Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #45
At least that's the way it's being reported Mr. Ected Aug 2022 #47
We have to disagree. The very presence of these documents at Log O' Merde says he was not Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #49
Like I said, a boy can dream Mr. Ected Aug 2022 #52
Me too. Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #54
His Whole Administration RobinA Aug 2022 #70
Exactly this. And I didn't want to have my eyes opened to that! Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #86
Again, I'll point out Saboburns Aug 2022 #68
And again, I'll point out: Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #72
Ask Wray, A Trump Appointee DallasNE Aug 2022 #22
DOJ/FBI don't want to move on Trump. Starfury Aug 2022 #25
So they have a grand jury just to pass the time of day? wnylib Aug 2022 #44
Obviously not Starfury Aug 2022 #90
Is he being given opportunities, or wnylib Aug 2022 #91
If You Give Someone Enough Rope Aviation91 Aug 2022 #26
Here's the video for those who missed it: Rhiannon12866 Aug 2022 #29
Welcome Aboard fff, gab13by13 Aug 2022 #33
There we go again. It's DOJ that failed. Wasn't it the National Archive that was Beastly Boy Aug 2022 #35
I think this whole thread is hogwash William769 Aug 2022 #36
So, will DOJ go silent now that we are within 90 days of the election? gab13by13 Aug 2022 #37
I share your frustration, but there is a process that must be followed totodeinhere Aug 2022 #42
I heard that segment. He said that was his criticism of the FBI. Not that they did the warrant but.. CousinIT Aug 2022 #51
Seen this post? BSdetect Aug 2022 #53
She was arrested days after the CREATION of the document she leaked. I don't know Scrivener7 Aug 2022 #55
big difference: she did not have power to classify treestar Aug 2022 #75
We must remember that there quite a few Trumpian embed within the DOJ, still. Samrob Aug 2022 #56
I just called my Senators randr Aug 2022 #60
This: calimary Aug 2022 #62
Top Secret Docs at the highest level..... mudstump Aug 2022 #65
The Trump White House was a free for all. fightforfreedom Aug 2022 #66
This Is Trump's Superpower RobinA Aug 2022 #73
Trump has proven... mudstump Aug 2022 #84
SOP is tippy-toeing around TFG. He's such a crook, but they're all scared of him Cozmo Aug 2022 #67
I totally agree! WestCoastDem42 Aug 2022 #69
What deadline exists? treestar Aug 2022 #74
It would be good to recover the documents before foreign agents take pictures of them. JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2022 #77
Not only slow, but too narrowly focused. JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2022 #78
+1, uponit7771 Aug 2022 #83
And sheepishly asked him to put a lock on the door. louis-t Aug 2022 #87
The DOJ/FBI were slow to crack down on TFG LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2022 #92

aeromanKC

(3,890 posts)
1. Also Figluizzi: Classified for Capital
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 04:55 PM
Aug 2022

Trump was squirreling away those documents to be used as a later date for personal gain.

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)
59. And a big who cares. Going after a former president is not the same thing as going after the
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 11:02 AM
Aug 2022

average citizen. If these folks don't get that, well I will put them in the never pleased category and ignore them.

Justice matters.

(9,786 posts)
81. On January 20, 2021, at 12:00, he returned to ordinary citizen status.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 02:50 PM
Aug 2022

USPOTUS is not a king. He's got no royalty status for life. He is subject to the rule of law exactly like every single US citizen.

What a reality check, eh?

Handler

(339 posts)
88. It should be exactly the same. No person is above the law. I will comfortable in your ignore pile.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 04:40 PM
Aug 2022

Kid Berwyn

(24,374 posts)
24. Remarkable quote from former FBI guy.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 06:37 PM
Aug 2022

“…he’s not just a collector, but rather he was intending to use it to his own benefit. He saw ‘Classified’ as capital and he was waiting for the moment to use it.”

calimary

(90,010 posts)
28. He wants to use them to make money.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:01 PM
Aug 2022

Last edited Wed Aug 24, 2022, 03:07 PM - Edit history (3)

That's ALL he EVER wants to do.

You've heard of the kid with the most toys. Well, HE'S the kid who wants to be the one with the most MONEY.

He gave the store away when he said "it's not theirs. It's MINE." That's WHERE he is and WHAT he's about and HOW he thinks.

What really annoys me is how naive the media's been, most of the commentators have been, most of the reporters and so-called specialists have been. Having done this for a living, I learned that there's an effort in the media to BEND OVER BACKWARDS AND INTO PRETZELDOM to be, or at least sound, objective. You've GOT TO seem like you're treating everything equally, and you strive to be absolutely immaculately unbiased.

But if you're working so painfully hard to be unbiased, then you're not really doing the job. Your reporting has no direction and no guts. Your approach is cowardly in that you move heaven and earth NOT to point the finger at anybody. Especially when there's such ridiculously glaring proof that one side is pretty much evenhanded and the other is so crooked we're actually talking possible charges that - well - might, could, maybe, come along one of these centuries.

The news media consistently shies away from calling a spade a space, even when reality regularly hits them in the collective face with a big messy cream pie. WAY too cautious when we've long ago established there's reason not to be. TOO MUCH SO, for my taste.

How long did we stay calcified like this? The earliest glaring offense, at least that comes to mind for me, is when all those Russians were invited into the Oval Office, and not a single American journalist or news network/publication/channel/blog was included in the coverage. Not ONE. We had to take what the single invited Russian news outlet made available.

This is one crook who hasn't deserved the benefit of the doubt FOR DECADES by now. He squandered that LONG ago. Why too many people still insist he deserves that privilege. I am NOT one of them. I'd daresay nobody else on this board is, either.

And where was the uproar? Nothing but a shrug - "...Meh, guess that's how we do business these days..."

DENVERPOPS

(13,003 posts)
85. One thing
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 03:58 PM
Aug 2022

is they wanted an iron clad case, and they got Trump to say several times, IN FRONT OF THE MEDIA, that there were no more documents prior to this last raid.......

Self incriminating, on the record, several times......

Who knows how many Top Secret items he and his "spawn" had sold in the previous four years? There were signs that he had sold many before he ever left the white house. The feds were probably waiting for proof that he actually sold them by showing proof of who received them. Look no farther/further? than Jared with the Saudis.........

(I can never remember, is it further or farther ?????......)

Hermit-The-Prog

(36,631 posts)
32. They weren't shy about "clouds and shadows" over Hillary Clinton
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:34 PM
Aug 2022

Also, who's to say that trumPutin wasn't transporting documents with every golf trip he made while in office?

Evolve Dammit

(21,774 posts)
34. Or as negotiable get out of jail free cards. I'm tired of the theatre. A Dem would have been in jail
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:38 PM
Aug 2022

Handler

(339 posts)
89. Right you are. I think he will also use them to leverage power. Which would equal money I suppose.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 04:46 PM
Aug 2022

dchill

(42,660 posts)
15. Let's wait and see. Ask again later.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:22 PM
Aug 2022

I would say more, but I hate to use "upset" and "applecart" in the same sentence. Or in the same week.

ShazzieB

(22,582 posts)
30. Eh, nobody gets to tell us whether to be patient or not.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:12 PM
Aug 2022

The way I see it, whatever's going to happen (or not) is going to happen (or not) whenever it gets ready to happen (or not), based on many factors over which we have no control.

Furthermore, those who have the authority to decide what's going to happen and when are going to make their decisions based on factors we have little knowledge of, and they are not required to take our opinions into account. No matter how we may feel about that, I believe that's how it is.

I don't blame anyone for being impatient, believe me. If that's how you feel, that's how you feel. Personally, I am greatly enjoying the steady unfolding of revelations regarding TFG's criminal misbehavior, together with the drama surrounding the Georgia grand jury and the anticipation of September's hearings, and that is keeping me going for now.

It seems like we are learning something new every day, and things are looking worse for TFG all the time. Ths pleases me greatly. If we were hearing no news at all, THAT would bother me a lot, but that is decidedly not the case. So I can live with this for now...but that's just me, and I recognize that some feel feel very differently, and no one has the right to tell anyone else how to feel.

RussBLib

(10,635 posts)
39. Well put, Shazzie
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:53 PM
Aug 2022

I very much related to that. It has been fascinating to watch the steady unraveling (finally) of DJT.

And, by the way, I do wonder what exactly happens when one stops being patient?

DBoon

(24,982 posts)
61. What was the classification of that one document?
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 11:52 AM
Aug 2022

I recall it was "Secret". If so, that is a huge difference from the TS-SCI documents Trump mishandled.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
3. And, the most they could do was suggest a better padlock?
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 04:57 PM
Aug 2022

I have to agree. It is amazing our country is still intact.

P.S. Do you suppose Trump knew how to operate a Xerox machine?

magicarpet

(18,508 posts)
12. That was Kash Patel's job assignment,...
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:19 PM
Aug 2022

..... convert the top secret papers to Xerox and digital format for easier storage, handling, and eventual marketability the highest bidders that could be located.

tishaLA

(14,775 posts)
38. precisely
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:42 PM
Aug 2022

Even if whatshisname doesn't go down for this, Patel will. And whatshisname will happily repay Patel's misplaced loyalty with disloyalty.

magicarpet

(18,508 posts)
13. That was Kash Patel's job assignment,...
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:20 PM
Aug 2022

..... convert the top secret papers to Xerox and digital format for easier storage, handling, and eventual marketability to the highest bidders that could be located.

Vinca

(53,986 posts)
6. I wish Frank had been asked if he thought other Trump properties should be searched. If
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:06 PM
Aug 2022

he's got stuff at Mar-a-Grifto, he's probably also got it at his favorite golf course and that skyscraper that looks like a bordello in NYC.

Rebl2

(17,738 posts)
11. I think
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:19 PM
Aug 2022

he does too. I think every property he owns should be searched. Maybe Don jr. too.

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
46. We'd all be dancing in the streets if they took action 15 months after the theft of the documents.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:02 AM
Aug 2022

onenote

(46,139 posts)
10. The timeline:
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:17 PM
Aug 2022

NARA first discovers Trump has held onto classified, highly sensitive documents when they are found in the 15 boxes of documents delivered to NARA in mid-January 2022. It wasn't looking for classified material at that time -- indeed its focus appears to have been on more mundane seeming documents that it knew about but hadn't found in the material turned over to NARA at the end of Trump's term. It appears that, having discovered that the boxes contained sensitive material, NARA promptly informed the DOJ which began following the detailed steps laid out in the law to get access to those documents from NARA, which is required by statute not to disclose them to anyone (even the FBI) except under certain circumstances and following certain procedures.

In addition, in early February, DOJ commenced an investigation (including a grand jury proceeding), which over the next couple of months produces credible information (in the form of witness statements) that there are more classified documents at Mar a Lago. DOJ then obtains and serves in May a grand subpoena to recover those documents. The documents are retrieved in early June and Trump's attorney attests that there are no other classified documents. Nonetheless, DOJ continues its investigation, conducting additional witness interviews and obtaining via a new subpoena access to surveillance video from Mar a Lago and learns from other witnesses that there Trump may still have additional classified documents. At this point, DOJ begins preparing a detailed affidavit for presentation to a judge magistrate to obtain a search warrant, which it executes shortly thereafter, collecting additional documents which are currently being reviewed but which are reported to include yet more classified, highly sensitive material.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
23. I have no doubt the DOJ was investigating the stolen documents.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 06:24 PM
Aug 2022

It simply appears they could have moved with more urgency with what was at stake. Maybe one day we will learn more about why it took so long to get a warrant. Maybe there are legit reasons. but right now it looks bad.

The most important thing right now is, when will Garland indict Trump. It is pretty clear Trump committed multiple felonies.

tinrobot

(12,061 posts)
27. And what would have happened if they searched his residence and came up empty?
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 06:47 PM
Aug 2022

You don't just bust into a former president's home without loads of evidence and probable cause.

That's why it took longer than your imagined timeline. They had to know exactly what documents were there, as well as where those documents were located. These things were not trivial, it took time to get all the information they needed to execute the search.

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
41. Totally agree.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 09:04 PM
Aug 2022

Here's an insight. Secret Compartmentalized Information (SCI) documents were found in Mar-a-Loco raid. SCI DOCUMENTS CAN NOT BE DECLASSIED BY A POTUS. also, SCI DOCUMENTS MAY NEVER BE REMOVED BY ANYBODY, INCLUDING POTUS, EVER.

When those level of documents were stolen it was known who had purloined them within 10 minutes. And, assuredly, these documents are tracked real time.

I think all these timelines are hogwash, they're based on the dates of news articles were published, which has no correlation, and does not purport to reveal what the DOJ knows and when they knowed it.

The DOJ knows more than you and I, more than what's been in the media, and for once is being as silent as a post, NO LEAKS.


I think the FBI knows everything and has all the proof.

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
48. Once again: WHY did NARA not know the documents were missing for a year? HOW did
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:11 AM
Aug 2022

the absolutely ironclad security procedures that are supposed to be used for these most top secret documents get bypassed?

Once they knew there were documents missing, WHY was an inventory not done to know what other documents were gone? The correct handling of those documents produces a trail. WHY would anyone believe there were no more documents when, surely, their own inventory showed that there were more.

onenote

(46,139 posts)
50. How would NARA know?
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:15 AM
Aug 2022

The reason they started asking was that well publicized documents like the sharpie weather map and the North Korea love letter didn’t appear when the catalogued the documents they had. How would they know about secret documents?

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
64. You're missing a major point. It is important.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 12:14 PM
Aug 2022

NARA is an archive.

They do not provide security for the millions of secret documents in our government. That NARA was not aware docs were missing isn't even a little bit important.

WE DON'T KNOW WHEN THOSE TASKED WITH THE SECURITY OF SECRET DOCUMENTS WERE AWARE THEY WERE MISSING AND POSSIBLY WHO TOOK THEM!

Things like that aren't printed in newspapers. OR ANYWHERE ELSE!

When you finally figure this point out, well then...

Go ahead, give it some thought...





Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
71. Those most secure documents are supposed to be moved only under rigorous security conditions and
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 01:01 PM
Aug 2022

with a clear chain of custody among specially designated security personnel. Under those restrictive conditions they are only supposed to go from one SCIF to another.

We're talking about nuclear secrets, by some reports. Spy identities by other reports.

How did those tasked with their security lose track of them? And if they were not returned to the places NARA designated for them, why did NARA not know this?

Go ahead, give it some thought.

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
76. You're still not getting it.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 01:46 PM
Aug 2022

Forget Nara for a moment.

Those most secure documents are supposed to be moved only under rigorous security conditions and
View profile
with a clear chain of custody among specially designated security personnel. Under those restrictive conditions they are only supposed to go from one SCIF to another.

We're talking about nuclear secrets, by some reports. Spy identities by other reports.


EXACTLY! YES! All these things make me think those tasked with document security knew the minute those docs were stolen. Who stole them. And tracked them. The minute they disappeared.

Government Services Administration, GSA, is responsible for the security, and custodians of, US Government secret Documents.

Let me try it this way...

We do not know when these documents were known to be missing. THAT INFORMATION IS NOT YET IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE. The GSA would be the first agency to know, who then goes to the DOJ/FBI and tells them what is missing. The DOJ/FBI investigates this problem. They haven't released any details yet concerning when documents were known to be missing. It could be the minute they were stolen.

All we know is that the NARA didn't know about missing documents. That's all that is in the public sphere, as of now. And it's not all that important!

Get it?

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
80. So you're thinking it was a sting and for some reason
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 02:47 PM
Aug 2022

don't want to say that outright?

I have said often that a sting is the only scenario which doesn't represent a total fuckup by our entire security apparatus.

Unfortunately, that's also the least likely scenario.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
14. You're right. The DOJ/FBI was too lenient with the crooked...
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:22 PM
Aug 2022

trump cabal, probably out of respect for him being a former president. It took three visits to MRL to finally get the docs, and now they still don't think they got them all.

Just having them away from the National Archives is criminal and IMO after the subpoena wasn't complied to, the warrant and search should've been forthcoming. I would've skip the last two courtesy attempts to get the docs back.

Mr. Ected

(9,714 posts)
21. Might Trump have been the subject of a wire tap or other surveillance during the lag period?
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 06:10 PM
Aug 2022

With information this sensitive and national security on the line, it seems preposterous that he wasn't being monitored the whole time to see if he was attempting to sell, move or otherwise leverage the materials he had illegally attained.

I wonder if there is a sting operation that none of us is aware of.

A boy can dream.

wnylib

(26,008 posts)
43. I've been thinking the same thing.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 09:54 PM
Aug 2022

I believe that there is a much larger criminal picture here and the search of MAL is just one step in the process. I suspect that there is an indication of more criminal activity with the documents and DOJ is gathering evidence to support that indication.

When it is all out in the open, it will be mind blowing.

Meantime, I am glad to see that, unlike Nixon, Trump is being thoroughly investigated after leaving office.

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
45. It's the only scenario in which the presence of those documents in a hotel basement for 18 months is
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 08:52 AM
Aug 2022

not a complete failure of our security apparatus.

HOWEVER, I don't think that's the case. I don't think the DOJ was particularly concerning themselves with doing much more than "negotiating" about the return of the documents. The reason I think this is that there was a report that the only reason the warrant was served was because someone saw something concerning on security tapes.

Granted, a warrant was served as a result, but that "concerning thing" happened. It was not prevented. This points to this being just a guy saying, "Whoa shit!" rather than a well run DOJ sting operation.

Mr. Ected

(9,714 posts)
47. At least that's the way it's being reported
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:04 AM
Aug 2022

Remember, the media isn't concerning itself with possible covert surveillance. Why would they? But it seems to me that behind closed doors, during Trump's presidency, his powers were on a short leash and our national security and defense departments were ready to pull the plug on any executive order that was out of the ordinary. I wonder if he ever really escaped their radar, particularly post-J6.

Regardless of what WE were told subsequent to the Mueller Report, THEY knew he was a Russian asset and a threat to our democracy. I don't think the powers that be are as deferential to him as the national news media, at least I hope to God they're not.

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
49. We have to disagree. The very presence of these documents at Log O' Merde says he was not
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:13 AM
Aug 2022

on a short leash at all.

That's if it was not a sting. In my deepest heart, I really hope it was. It just doesn't look like it, though.

Mr. Ected

(9,714 posts)
52. Like I said, a boy can dream
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:26 AM
Aug 2022

I don't necessarily believe it either, but it's within the realm of plausibility and I'd like to think that our national security is bigger than one man or his cult army of the disinformed.

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
54. Me too.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:35 AM
Aug 2022

This whole thing, in addition to infuriating me, makes me so sad. He just wrecked everything. I think I thought that at the deepest level, there were security people who took their jobs seriously. Live and learn.

RobinA

(10,478 posts)
70. His Whole Administration
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 01:01 PM
Aug 2022

and beyond has been one big episode of "I thought there were people AT ALL LEVELS who took their jobs seriously." I have always thought that Trump is a narcissistic moron, never bought the notion that he would straighten up and fly right when he got the nomination/got elected/got into office. But I did think that he would be at least somewhat leashed by people on both sides who had some sense. I actually had some notion that there was a bit of a deep state that would make sure nothing went completely off the rails. Although some checks and balances did function, I find it scary and sad that some narcissistic nonmoron could come along and drive us completely off a cliff.

The lack of grown-ups in the room has been the real eye-opener to me in this episode.

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
68. Again, I'll point out
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 12:39 PM
Aug 2022

NARA is an archive.

They do not provide security for the millions of secret documents in our government. That NARA was not aware docs were missing isn't even a little bit important.

WE DON'T KNOW WHEN THOSE TASKED WITH THE SECURITY OF SECRET DOCUMENTS WERE AWARE THEY WERE MISSING AND POSSIBLY WHO TOOK THEM!

Things like that aren't printed in newspapers. OR ANYWHERE ELSE!

When you finally figure this point out, well then...

Go ahead, give it some thought...

And you might want to slow your roll and stop bitching about how the FBI are clueless stumble bums who didn't even know this stuff was missing for 18 months.

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
72. And again, I'll point out:
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 01:04 PM
Aug 2022

Those most secure documents are supposed to be moved only under rigorous security conditions and with a clear chain of custody among specially designated security personnel. Under those restrictive conditions they are only supposed to go from one SCIF to another.

We're talking about nuclear secrets, by some reports. Spy identities by other reports.

How did those tasked with their security lose track of them? And if they were not returned to the places NARA designated for them, why did NARA not know this?

Go ahead, give it some thought.

DallasNE

(8,007 posts)
22. Ask Wray, A Trump Appointee
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 06:13 PM
Aug 2022

First, he needed to recuse himself. Plenty of grounds to fire Wray. - wrong person for the job in the first place.

Starfury

(860 posts)
25. DOJ/FBI don't want to move on Trump.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 06:43 PM
Aug 2022

Just my opinion, but I think they'd much rather it all just quietly went away.

Starfury

(860 posts)
90. Obviously not
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 08:38 PM
Aug 2022

But no one seems to be in a rush, either. Just on these classified documents alone, charges could have been brought months ago, but so far nothing. That seems to be the pattern in all of these investigations.

I'd love to be proven wrong. But Trump is being handled with kid gloves and given every opportunity, far more than anyone else would receive in similar circumstances.

wnylib

(26,008 posts)
91. Is he being given opportunities, or
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 08:57 PM
Aug 2022

is DOJ lining everything up to have an air tight case that can't lose? It's one thing to see what Trump is doing, but another thing to collect all the witnesses, tapes, and evidence that will hold up so solidly in court that no spin by Trump or his lawyers can get around it.

I think that there is something much bigger going on than we can see, and that DOJ is pulling it all together. That might mean letting some things play out in order to nail them.

Aviation91

(122 posts)
26. If You Give Someone Enough Rope
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 06:45 PM
Aug 2022

they end up hanging themselves! I don't think that was the DOJ's intention but it has ended up working in their favor!

Rhiannon12866

(255,525 posts)
29. Here's the video for those who missed it:
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:07 PM
Aug 2022
Reports That Trump Reviewed Documents Shows His 'Willful Intent' Says Figliuzzi - Deadline - MSNBC
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017761065

Former FBI Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Frank Figliuzzi and New York Times Washington correspondent Michael Schmidt weigh in on new reporting that Trump had over 300 classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, and reviewed many of them. - Aired on 08/23/2022.

gab13by13

(32,314 posts)
33. Welcome Aboard fff,
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:37 PM
Aug 2022

I watched 3 other former prosecutors say the same thing this afternoon, "they are treating Trump with kid gloves."

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
35. There we go again. It's DOJ that failed. Wasn't it the National Archive that was
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:40 PM
Aug 2022

supposed to secure the documents in question, not DOJ? So who failed to secure the said document? Why, DOJ, of course!

And wasn't it NARA that asked the FBI to investigate the whereabouts of those missing documents on Feb 9, with the FBI promptly conducting a search of Mar a Lago on Feb 22?

And wasn't NARA supposed to secure the found documents and request action from the FBI regarding any additional documents that they eventually determined were still missing?

And do we know exactly what transpired between NARA and DOJ in the course of the following six months? Hmmm, no. Nothing at all. And didn't DOJ continue its investigation of the missing documents independent of NARA during this time, ultimately conducting the second search? This can can only mean one thing: it was DOJ that was slow in getting the warrant for the second search. It was DOJ that didn't act immediately. It was DOJ that didn't handle it well.

At the risk of unduly abusing the old tired phrase that embarrassed so many DUers in the past, what took them so long???

Let the blame game continue! Because when there is no basis for all the accusations flying around, it's much more fun to get them flying anyway than waiting for facts to become known.

gab13by13

(32,314 posts)
37. So, will DOJ go silent now that we are within 90 days of the election?
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 07:41 PM
Aug 2022

My opinion is that Trump isn't on the ballot.

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
42. I share your frustration, but there is a process that must be followed
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 09:08 PM
Aug 2022

and it takes time if it is going to be done right. As we all know the wheels of legal justice grind very slowly.

CousinIT

(12,533 posts)
51. I heard that segment. He said that was his criticism of the FBI. Not that they did the warrant but..
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:22 AM
Aug 2022

...that it took them FAR TOO LONG as they fiddled with Fat Lord Fauntleroy trying to get him to give them back willingly.

BSdetect

(9,048 posts)
53. Seen this post?
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:29 AM
Aug 2022

Jeff Tiedrich
@itsJeffTiedrich
·
Follow
your reminder that Reality Winner swiped one document and was quickly arrested and did four years in prison. no polite requests. no gently-worded letters. no pretty-pleases. no second chances. no months-long negotiations. one document. four years
7:10 AM · Aug 23, 2022

Scrivener7

(59,516 posts)
55. She was arrested days after the CREATION of the document she leaked. I don't know
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:42 AM
Aug 2022

how long after the leak itself she was arrested, but it was days. Not weeks.

Samrob

(4,298 posts)
56. We must remember that there quite a few Trumpian embed within the DOJ, still.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 10:34 AM
Aug 2022

How else do you imagine that Trump and his minions have been able to get away with virtually no consequences to them or their fortunes?

randr

(12,648 posts)
60. I just called my Senators
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 11:46 AM
Aug 2022

I informed them that we are in a slow burn and want accountability from tfg. We can not wait for the Repugs to step up, we need to grab the high road and brand tfg for what he is, a traitor and criminal. There has been a vacuum of response from all Washington and it is time for it to end,

calimary

(90,010 posts)
62. This:
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 12:00 PM
Aug 2022

“… They learned there were secret documents in January and you spend months negotiating with someone you know you can't trust. Please give us back the secret documents that are sitting there insecure. How many times did they ask Trump for those documents? It was more than once.“

WHY are these folks STILL giving him the benefit of the doubt????????

Shit - we’ve LONG seen how he operates and his EXTENSIVE track record for lying and deceit. It’s not like he’s some new face or nobody who just came outta nowhere!

mudstump

(353 posts)
65. Top Secret Docs at the highest level.....
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 12:21 PM
Aug 2022

should have a chaperone or at least a chain of custody. Why are these docs so easily taken by anyone? If a doc has to be viewed in a secure location why was it taken out of that room? How did Trump get his hands on these? If docs are that sensitive and important to national security and lives are at risk shouldn't the document have someone who is with it at all times?

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
66. The Trump White House was a free for all.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 12:27 PM
Aug 2022

People would tell Trump you can't do that. He would then do it and people remained silent. Nothing we can do. A lot of cowards worked for Trump.

RobinA

(10,478 posts)
73. This Is Trump's Superpower
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 01:09 PM
Aug 2022

He does whatever he wants whenever he wants. He gets away with it because everybody, for a variety of reasons, fears to stop him.

mudstump

(353 posts)
84. Trump has proven...
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 03:44 PM
Aug 2022

just how vulnerable our government is to a wannabe dictator like him. It sure seems like the system needs tightening. There should be stricter rules around security clearances and classified materials should be kept track of all the time. Top secret docs should have an agent assigned to them when they are out of safe keeping and more people should be able to over rule the president on these and other important matters.

WestCoastDem42

(69 posts)
69. I totally agree!
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 12:48 PM
Aug 2022

Additionally, the FBI should immediately surround MAL and turn it inside out. If there's more documents then they need to be reclaimed. IMMEDIATELY!

JustABozoOnThisBus

(24,681 posts)
77. It would be good to recover the documents before foreign agents take pictures of them.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 02:31 PM
Aug 2022

Security services may or may not know if that has happened.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(24,681 posts)
78. Not only slow, but too narrowly focused.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 02:32 PM
Aug 2022

They should have hit all Trump's residences and workplaces simultaneously. He's probably got documents spread all over.

louis-t

(24,618 posts)
87. And sheepishly asked him to put a lock on the door.
Wed Aug 24, 2022, 04:25 PM
Aug 2022

Which apparently was breached according to the security tapes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frank Figliuzzi on MSNBC:...