Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellowcanine

(36,826 posts)
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 04:48 PM Aug 2022

Texas "Right to Life" Pedo caught in sting.

https://www.rawstory.com/texas-right-to-life-luke-bowen/


The former political director for the anti-abortion advocacy group Texas Right to Life has been charged with soliciting a minor online, The Courier reports.

Luke Bowen was caught in a sting carried out by Montgomery County Internet Crime Against Children. He faces a second-degree felony, which carried a two- to 20-year sentence and a fine of up to $10,000. He was released on $50,000 bond.

“This investigation revolves around a fictitious alleged minor created by law enforcement and posted on the Internet. There is not a real victim in the case," said Bowen's attorney E. Tay Bond.

Bowen has reportedly pleaded not guilty in the case.

Texas Right to Life told The Courier that Bowen was terminated from his position on Aug. 3, the same day he was charged, although details surrounding his termination were not provided.


13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas "Right to Life" Pedo caught in sting. (Original Post) yellowcanine Aug 2022 OP
Of course. blue neen Aug 2022 #1
The story is withholding details of age and gender... Silent3 Aug 2022 #2
Personally hate obvious entrapment, I don't care if it's 'them' or 'us', I think it's bullshit (nt) Hugh_Lebowski Aug 2022 #3
The charge is online solicitation of a minor ... TexasBushwhacker Aug 2022 #7
But ... there's no actual minor ... which means this is thought-crime, at its heart Hugh_Lebowski Aug 2022 #8
His lawyer says that. yellowcanine Aug 2022 #11
Again, fair point ... Hugh_Lebowski Aug 2022 #12
Entrapment is not obvious. yellowcanine Aug 2022 #9
Fair point, I should wait to see on that account, you're right (nt) Hugh_Lebowski Aug 2022 #10
Oh won't somebody please think of the children??? Initech Aug 2022 #4
Yep. dalton99a Aug 2022 #5
And another one's gone, another one's gone, another one bites the dust Blue Owl Aug 2022 #6
Wow, I lived there (in The Woodlands) and yes, they are everywhere. flying_wahini Aug 2022 #13
 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
2. The story is withholding details of age and gender...
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 04:51 PM
Aug 2022

...but I'll bet if this asshole got a teenage girl pregnant, there would have been no question about telling her to get an abortion.

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
3. Personally hate obvious entrapment, I don't care if it's 'them' or 'us', I think it's bullshit (nt)
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 05:16 PM
Aug 2022

TexasBushwhacker

(21,281 posts)
7. The charge is online solicitation of a minor ...
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 05:24 PM
Aug 2022

not actually having sex with a minor. Online solicitarion of sex with a minor is against the law. Sting operations catch people soliciting. That's the way it works.

Just look at the guy. He bought his face at "Incels R Us"!

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
8. But ... there's no actual minor ... which means this is thought-crime, at its heart
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 05:28 PM
Aug 2022

I don't support the use of this mechanism.

I think it's bullshit.

We can agree to disagree tho

yellowcanine

(36,826 posts)
11. His lawyer says that.
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 05:38 PM
Aug 2022

Suspects do lie to their lawyers. Stings do not occur in a vacuum. There may have been a real victim behind the decision to use a sting.

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
12. Again, fair point ...
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 05:46 PM
Aug 2022

But I really wouldn't expect a lawyer to trust the client in something like this, and then make a statement like that, professionally.

Much as I hate this prick, I suspect his lawyer would've confirmed the minor was fake before saying something like that publicly.

yellowcanine

(36,826 posts)
9. Entrapment is not obvious.
Thu Aug 25, 2022, 05:31 PM
Aug 2022
The perp may have been trolling for victims and the police responded. "Sting" does not always equals entrapment. Maybe wait for more details before saying it was entrapment?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas "Right to Life" Ped...