General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDon’t Let The GOP Blame Sandy - Salon
Sunday Best: Dont let the GOP blame SandyTop strategists are eager to blame Hurricane Sandy if Romney loses -- why it would be terrible if the media agrees
BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD - Salon
SUNDAY, NOV 4, 2012 10:20 AM PST
<snip>
With just two days to go before the election, it seems one side may already be making preparations for a defeat. While many of the pundits on todays Sunday morning political chat shows insisted the race was too close to call, others agreed that President Obama has the edge. Thats certainly what the math and the tea leaves lead us to believe. And it seems some Republicans are already preparing for defeat by trying to control the story of what went wrong. Essentially: Blame Sandy.
The hurricane is what broke Romneys momentum I dont think theres any question about it, former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, told CNNs State of the Union. Barbour, a former RNC chairman, is one of his partys savviest strategists and a key behind-the-scenes player.
Meanwhile, Karl Rove told the Washington Post that the storm turned out to be the real October surprise. If you hadnt had the storm, there would have been more of a chance for the Romney campaign to talk about the deficit, the debt, the economy. There was a stutter in the campaign. When you have attention drawn away to somewhere else, to something else, it is not to his [Romneys] advantage, Rove explained. Rove, with his deep-pocketed American Crossroads groups, is one of his partys savviest strategists and a key behind-the-scenes player (see a pattern here?).
Then theres Ed Gillespie, another savvy behind-the-scenes GOP strategist, who now work for the Romney campaign. Today, he actually praised the Obama administrations response to the storm on ABCs This Week, saying, Weve heard from the governors theres a good working relationship between the state and the federal government. He also hinted that Obama may have gained politically from the storm. This is from a campaign that has never praised anything Obama has ever done, and it would not be hard to poke the administration over fuel shortages or other lingering problems in the wake of Sandy. Gillespie could be uneasy about going too negative in the wake of a tragedy, but that certainly didnt stop the Romney campaign after the attacks in Libya. Or it could be an attempt to build up the storm and the administrations response.
And we knew this was coming. On Thursday, Politicos Mike Allen, who, say what you will about him, has stellar access to senior operatives, reported that Republicans are already laying the groundwork for scapegoating the storm. Youre already hearing Republicans hint that if Mitt Romney loses, that hell blame the storm. The people around him will cite that as a cause, that they had momentum, but it stopped cold, he said on MSNBC.
This effort to define the post-mortem narrative is far more than, as TPMs Josh Marshall wrote, CYA, cover your ass for pundits who predicted a big Romney win and are now preparing to eat crow. Rather, theres something of greater significance than pundits reputations on the line here. If Romney loses, the debate will immediately shift to defining why, and whatever narrative takes hold could set the tone for Obamas second term, should he win one.
Republicans are trying to make this the thumbnail story of the campaign: Romney was winning heading into the closing stretch until a freak super storm (not at all connected to global warming, of course) the week before the election turned things around for Obama. Basically, Obama got lucky....
<snip>
More: http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/sunday_best_dont_let_the_gop_blame_sandy/
rightsideout
(978 posts)Sandy affected mostly Blue States. NY and NJ were hurt the most.
The only states that this could affect are VA and PA. But they didn't get hit as bad as the solid Blue states.
So the Sandy claim is a real stretch.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Well, schmuck, maybe you and Romney and Rove and your sick ilk shouldn't have ridiculed global warming.
That's what happens when you piss in the wind, especially a BIG WIND... :>
))
Tutonic
(2,522 posts)Blame Sandy.
GoCubsGo
(34,936 posts)Damn Sandy. You had to come around and force Willard to show what an incompetent, callous fuck he is. Had you stayed away, he never would have had to expose himself, instead of keeping it all hidden in the closet, along with his tax returns, foreign bank accounts, and corrupt business dealings.
Raven
(14,275 posts)calm President doing his job. It showed a prominent Republican Governor acknowledging that fact. It showed the simp, Mitt Romney looking just plain stupid.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Blaming the weather!
If they had a REAL campaign, with a REAL candidate, they wouldn't be blaming the weather.
Maybe they should consult their god, as to whether or not he purposely started the storm that won it for Obama!
Then maybe they were consulting their talking snake instead.
spanone
(141,717 posts)...and Obama showed amazing bipartisanship and leadership....what america really wants.
Courtesy Flush
(4,558 posts)They've been making excuses from the beginning. How many times have we heard that Obama is buying our votes with government handouts?
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)1. Stark contrast between Obama and Bush in the way they handle a natural disaster.
2. Romney wants to do away with FEMA this is a great time to talk about that. Probably soon would have been better, but I will take now.
3. Romney illustrated what private volunteer citizen relief would look like.
4. Sandy shows that Obama is not the divider that the GOP says he is.
5. Romney wanted a photo OP with Christie. Christie turned him down flat. He could have asked "what can I do to help" but clearly trying to use the storm to his advantage instead.