Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalifornia's New Internet Law Is a Fucking Disaster
In the name of protecting children, legislators have introduced a trove of requirements that are anti-privacy and almost impossible to comply with.https://www.thedailybeast.com/californias-new-internet-law-is-a-fcking-disaster
For decades now, it has been a challenge for parents and others to make sure that children can experience the benefits of the internet without being exposed to its more harmful aspects. However, that concern for children can often be taken to such extreme levels that it does more harm than good.
In the 1990s, an exaggerated news story based on a quickly debunked report about online porn resulted in Democratic Sen. James Exon pushing through the Communications Decency Act. Exon, somewhat famously, printed out numerous pornographic images he found online, and put them into his little blue book to show other senators to urge them to vote for his law. Exons law was later struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional, saying it would place an unacceptably heavy burden on protected speech that threaten[ed] to torch a large segment of the Internet community.
Moral crusading about the risks of the internet to kids never goes out of fashion, however. The latest version of this is driven by a British baroness, Beeban Kidron, a Hollywood film director who launched a nonprofit organization to push for laws to, ostensibly, protect children online. When people have pointed out the challenges of regulating the internet, she has pointed to China as a positive example.
Link to tweet
Kidrons group, the 5Rights Foundation, takes credit for the U.K.s Age Appropriate Design Code (AADC)which is not actually a law, but rather guidance for regulators on how to interpret the U.K.s Data Protection Act. While 5Rights has submitted hundreds of complaints to U.K. regulators about websites under the AADC, the regulators have not taken action on any of them. That has not stopped 5Rights from taking credit for dozens of changes to various internet services.
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1140 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California's New Internet Law Is a Fucking Disaster (Original Post)
Celerity
Sep 2022
OP
CurtEastPoint
(18,664 posts)1. who/what is 'Beebs?'
Celerity
(43,532 posts)2. a British baroness, Beeban Kidron
CurtEastPoint
(18,664 posts)3. sorry again to be out of it. And what does she have to do with this?
Celerity
(43,532 posts)4. Did you not read the article? It is all there.
CurtEastPoint
(18,664 posts)6. Thank you and no, I did not. Sorry. Thanks for this.
Jack the Greater
(601 posts)5. You have Google to satisfy all your curiousities. n/t