Just because he claims something doesn't make it valid.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney–client_privilege
Crime–fraud exception
The crime–fraud exception can render the privilege moot when communications between an attorney and client are themselves used to further a crime, tort, or fraud. In Clark v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that "A client who consults an attorney for advice that will serve him in the commission of a fraud will have no help from the law. He must let the truth be told."[8] The crime–fraud exception also does require that the crime or fraud discussed between client and attorney be carried out to be triggered.[9] U.S. courts have not yet conclusively ruled how little knowledge an attorney can have of the underlying crime or fraud before the privilege detaches and the attorney's communications or requisite testimony become admissible.[10]
He's an idiot, a liar, and an asshole. If he's talking, he's spewing nonsense. Axiomatically. He makes
zero honest, good faith arguments, legal or otherwise.
For example, during one of the many legal actions against their criminal clan, one of his dumb sons tried to claim that a conversation between himself and his father was protected by attorney-client privilege because Michael Cohen was in the room and Michael Cohen was a lawyer.
= new reply since forum marked as read
