Who is the king?
= new reply since forum marked as read
But not very hard 
Since then he'll go be EII that will save a lot of money, as they won't have to change all the post boxes and other things with Elizabeth's initials. And anyway it's high time the Hanovers or whatever they're calling themselves these days apologized for their ancestors' treatment of the Anglo Saxons. 
As an American with no ties to Britain (other than having visited several times), I don't really care one way or the other. I'm just sitting on the sidelines watching the media circus.
and since that's one of his names, I'm betting he picks it.
I don't think he'll do that, though.
Well,played!
Full name, Charles Philip Arthur George Mountbatten-Windsor, which is quite a mouthful for anyone. He gets to choose by what name he will reign, and most people think he will stick with Charles and become King Charles III, but he could go by any of his other names. Likely not Philip, as that would be a reminder of Philip of Spain, who was the husband of Queen Mary I ("Bloody Mary"
and not very well liked to say the least. Arthur would be an interesting possibility, harkening back to legend and a Prince of Wales who was never king (Henry VIII's oldest son, who died young). George VII is another strong possibility; his grandfather, who he loved dearly as a young boy, was George VI. We'll have to wait and see.
There has never been a Queen Camilla. I suppose I could have got used to her if he'd been allowed to marry her in the first place, but I still can't stand her, even if she does make him happy. At least he had the sense to marry a pretty woman who produced handsome sons. I can't imagine what his and Camilla's kids would have looked like. 
And I wish some decent hair stylist would get her hair out of her face! That hairstyle does less than nothing for her.
Glad he married a “pretty woman”. 
Can’t believe I’m reading this here. 
