Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

skip fox

(19,359 posts)
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 05:52 PM Sep 2022

Could Trump's markings on the secret documents indicate his criminal use of them?

If such markings exist (and James Trusty, Trump's attorney claimed they do), could they point to what he gave to foreign governments? For instance, could they mark passages he wanted to send to Russia or Saudi Arabia?

Such markings would make Trusty correct when he argued in from of Judge Deare that such information could be used in a criminal trial.

Such markings would be a "smoking gun."

Is this why Trump was meeting with attorneys at his W. Virginia golf course (without clubs) last week?

Is this why Trump is stirring up his Q-Anon followers and implying riots would happen if he is indicted?

Is this why he returned to Mar-a-Lago the other night?

Would this legally complicate DOJ's investigation through the use of these documents?

Something seems to be happening and Trump's unwillingness to have DOJ look at these documents might well be at the center.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could Trump's markings on the secret documents indicate his criminal use of them? (Original Post) skip fox Sep 2022 OP
I don't believe the Pig does anything unless it brings him attention or money. Thomas Hurt Sep 2022 #1
The government would have to prove VMA131Marine Sep 2022 #2
They'd at least prove he looked at them. Ocelot II Sep 2022 #3
Just as good as fingerprints... Plus... targetpractice Sep 2022 #14
It is more likely a demonstration of laziness. Possibly he did personal business on them Johonny Sep 2022 #4
His concern the entire time has been the contents ScratchCat Sep 2022 #5
Good points. kentuck Sep 2022 #6
TFFG doesn't remember what he wrote. He's fishing. Tetrachloride Sep 2022 #7
Doodling... ultralite001 Sep 2022 #8
It would kind of depend on when he marked them... Chainfire Sep 2022 #9
But even if he marked them as President, they could indicate criminality. skip fox Sep 2022 #12
Hah... Sorry... targetpractice Sep 2022 #15
I haven't seen a description of the marks. Am I missing something? Chainfire Sep 2022 #16
It was in an earlier DOJ filing... targetpractice Sep 2022 #17
That would certainly show that he handled the documents, but not necessarily when. Chainfire Sep 2022 #23
You're probably right, but if the marking indicate he "sold" the documents skip fox Sep 2022 #24
His cult would find a way to justify his actions if he sold nuclear secrets to the Iranians. Chainfire Sep 2022 #25
It is all stolen government property. magicarpet Sep 2022 #10
His attorney's claim of markings might just be a delaying tactic. That what I thought at first, but skip fox Sep 2022 #13
Of course... The attorneys have no clue what he wrote, nor Trump... targetpractice Sep 2022 #20
Could he have written the bids from other countries Beachnutt Sep 2022 #11
It's a habit of his... targetpractice Sep 2022 #18
Telling and revealing DJT doodles in red Sharpies,... magicarpet Sep 2022 #21
What's criminal about price tags? Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #19
The implication! skip fox Sep 2022 #22
DJT kept the top secret docs to monetize them. magicarpet Sep 2022 #29
It's a CRIME EndlessWire Sep 2022 #26
He certainly wants to keep them hidden for some reason? kentuck Sep 2022 #27
That's what I'm thinking. skip fox Sep 2022 #28

VMA131Marine

(4,149 posts)
2. The government would have to prove
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 05:56 PM
Sep 2022

that Trump made them after he was out of office, I think.
But I’m not sure that would be necessary; just possessing the documents is a serious crime.

Ocelot II

(115,836 posts)
3. They'd at least prove he looked at them.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 05:57 PM
Sep 2022

We don't know yet what he wrote but obviously that could be important evidence.

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
14. Just as good as fingerprints... Plus...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:34 PM
Sep 2022

Notes like: "TALK TO PUTIN ABOUT THIS", "SHARE WITH ISRAEL" would certainly help the DOJ prosecute.

Johonny

(20,888 posts)
4. It is more likely a demonstration of laziness. Possibly he did personal business on them
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:00 PM
Sep 2022

in the belief such documents could not be shared with legal teams. But that would be high level thinking. More likely its really dumb stuff because he was lazy and had no respect for the office.

ScratchCat

(2,002 posts)
5. His concern the entire time has been the contents
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:08 PM
Sep 2022

Rather than the fact that mere possession is a felony. That should tell you a lot. So what could both be classified and be evidence he committed crimes? The possibilities. .

The Ukraine phone call. A criminal referral was made and doj rejected it as "filed improperly".

Transcript of meetings with Putin

Things he ordered from intelligence agencies, like nuclear assessments

Russia investigation files

If we invoke "projection", maybe he spied on people domestically and classified it to keep it hidden?

He thinks it all belongs to him, so it's a fair guess that it all has something to do with him in one way or another.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
6. Good points.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:10 PM
Sep 2022

His notes most likely are for his own memory and benefit, of why he wants to keep the document or what purpose might it benefit him?

Tetrachloride

(7,865 posts)
7. TFFG doesn't remember what he wrote. He's fishing.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:13 PM
Sep 2022

— my guess above and possibilities below

1. He doesn’t remember what he wrote
2. He doesn’t remember all of the people in the room when he did.
3. Everybody in the room took off their shoes except him and the FBI.
4. Some writings had instructions such as “investigate Biden” or “sell this to Saudis”.

ultralite001

(894 posts)
8. Doodling...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:17 PM
Sep 2022

You've seen RTump's artwork...

Sharpie is RTump's way of "marking" territory... even if it's not his...


That is all...

Chainfire

(17,636 posts)
9. It would kind of depend on when he marked them...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:17 PM
Sep 2022

If he made notes or doodled on them while he was President, then there is probably no foul. That point can be argued until the cows come home and present a fine cause for further delay.

Trump doesn't have to win in court, he believes that if he can keep the ball in the air, and the indictment from the door, until the elections, and the Republicans take the house, he is home free. He may wrong, or he may be right, it may really mean that justice delayed will be justice denied.

Our best hope may be an act of dog to end his reign.

skip fox

(19,359 posts)
12. But even if he marked them as President, they could indicate criminality.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:30 PM
Sep 2022

Marking passages and noting something to indicate "send this to Putin" (probably in personal code) would still indicate a crime occurred.

Otherwise any president could sell any secrets to whoever he or she wanted with impunity. I'm sure there are multiple laws against this.

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
15. Hah... Sorry...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:37 PM
Sep 2022

I posted "SEND TO PUTIN" before I read your post. Great minds, think alike or something...

My theory has been that Trump didn't scrub the boxes of crimes.. He's too lazy to go through boxes himself, and nobody wanted to help him. He's worried about what the DOJ might find in all that shit. And, his lawyers certainly have no clue what's in there.

Today was a delicious day for schadenfreude.

Chainfire

(17,636 posts)
16. I haven't seen a description of the marks. Am I missing something?
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:38 PM
Sep 2022

I think that doodling on the documents would be a hard crime to convict. Perhaps the Justice Department will want to open a new investigation on the issue...

There is so much other evidence I am not really sure that it matters much in the grand scheme of things. If he had the documents illegally, as we all believe, then that may be an inconsequential detail. It may be like the defense arguing that, "No my client did not stab the dead victim 45 times, it was only 43!" But, I am a plumber, not a lawyer.

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
17. It was in an earlier DOJ filing...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:40 PM
Sep 2022

... They attested that some classified documents had notes written on them in Trump's handwriting.

Chainfire

(17,636 posts)
23. That would certainly show that he handled the documents, but not necessarily when.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:55 PM
Sep 2022

I think that it is perfectly clear, that if the documents were in his desk drawer, he had unauthorized possession of them. So the question becomes, how much do the markings matter? Give the asshole a pass on the markings and convict him for stealing the documents.... He may have also torn the tags off of his mattress, but convict him of supporting an insurrection!

Freddy the Great told us that, "He who defends all defends nothing." I think that the same principle can apply to the prosecution of a criminal.

If it was up to me, I would apply the same amount of respect for the law that Trump has demonstrated, and I would jail him now and try him at my convenience.

skip fox

(19,359 posts)
24. You're probably right, but if the marking indicate he "sold" the documents
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 07:00 PM
Sep 2022

all but the most craven and insane of his followers might wake up!

He would become America's greatest traitor. Benedict Arnold, step aside!

Chainfire

(17,636 posts)
25. His cult would find a way to justify his actions if he sold nuclear secrets to the Iranians.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 07:03 PM
Sep 2022

They are too committed to turn back now. However, it may impress enough fence setters to make a difference.

magicarpet

(14,167 posts)
10. It is all stolen government property.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:25 PM
Sep 2022

Those documents do not belong to DJT.

The pilfered top secret one's are particularly pernicious because of the harm and damage to national security.

The paperwork, documents, and government files belong at the US National Archive Office. To then be sorted and cataloged then eventually made available so the public, researchers, and historians for controlled public access and viewing. America owns the documents created from each administration's four year terms. It is part of the historical record of our country. We pay all operational costs, by way of collected tax payments, to provide the funds that keeps this government up and running.

DJT is not a King or Monarch. These are not royal files, documents, or records. They are not for any King to decree what is stored and decree what is disposed of.

DjT is only seeking to deflect attention away from the fact that he pilfered and plundered these government owned records. Once proven he should be prosecuted and made to suffer severe repercussions and sanctions.

skip fox

(19,359 posts)
13. His attorney's claim of markings might just be a delaying tactic. That what I thought at first, but
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:34 PM
Sep 2022

Trump's recent frantic activities might be explained by his worry that DOJ will see these marking.

Just speculation, of course, but not much is beyond this man.

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
20. Of course... The attorneys have no clue what he wrote, nor Trump...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:45 PM
Sep 2022

... And, they have no clue what they need to mount a defense against. Too bad. So sad.

Trump brain farts with his Sharpies... Like a kind of Tourette's involuntary thing for him.

My theories for the irrational behavior of wanting stuff back is because neither Trump nor his lawyers have any idea of what other crimes are contained within those dozens of seized boxes. And, Trump was too lazy to scrub himself, and nobody else wanted to get involved or help him.

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
18. It's a habit of his...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:41 PM
Sep 2022

... He writes notes on news clippings, magazine articles, etc... All in that glorious black Sharpie.

magicarpet

(14,167 posts)
21. Telling and revealing DJT doodles in red Sharpies,...
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 06:48 PM
Sep 2022

Written in the margins of DJT held top secret docs.




- MBS
-$700K

- PUTIE
-$900K

- FRANCE
- MACRON BLACKMAIL
- $3 M

- ISRAEL
- MORE NUKE SECRETS
- $57M

Etc. Etc. Etc.

magicarpet

(14,167 posts)
29. DJT kept the top secret docs to monetize them.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 07:51 PM
Sep 2022

Shop around for the highest bidder then sell top secret docs to adversaries. DJT pockets the money.

That is the worst case scenario.

That is why there are stiff laws against espionage of sensitive and top secret docs. Info that is very damaging or dangerous in the wrong hands.

EndlessWire

(6,565 posts)
26. It's a CRIME
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 07:14 PM
Sep 2022

to deface the docs. It would be a defacement to write upon them. He is simply running out of excuses for what he did. He keeps digging a hole deeper, hoping to get out of it.

Give up, Donald, and flee.

skip fox

(19,359 posts)
28. That's what I'm thinking.
Tue Sep 20, 2022, 07:38 PM
Sep 2022

He wants to hang onto these and keep them hidden more even than his tax returns.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could Trump's markings on...