General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMessage auto-removed
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)walkingman
(10,502 posts)luv2fly
(2,618 posts)But making fun of his sexuality isn't funny.
Brainfodder
(7,781 posts)I razz the guy for being a turd in general and not having the courage to be a positive on that.
I could careless about you or anyone else as far as sex anything, as long as it aint morally bankrupt you should know better shit.
Senator Lindsey Graham of SC, career politician, KNOWS WAY THE FUCK BETTER.
I rest my case.
Response to luv2fly (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
luv2fly
(2,618 posts)When you make fun of people's sexuality, their virility, how they look, etc, it means you have nothing else.
There's lots to dislike about Lindsey, his policies are atrocious, but yet people go for the easy stuff. It's pathetic.
Response to luv2fly (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)Mister Ed
(6,871 posts)The idea seems to be that a gay man should not be voting on legislation regarding women's reproductive health and reproductive rights?
I would venture to guess that many or most gay men are supportive of women's rights. Suppose, for example, that Pete Buttigieg were a legislator rather than Secretary of Transportation. Would he really be unqualified to vote on bills concerning abortion?
Contrariwise, the world is filled with misogynists who may have plenty of sexual experience with women, but should not be allowed to regulate women's lives.
That was just a half-assed, foolish cheap shot on the part of that panelist.
magicarpet
(18,464 posts)One is a glaring opportunist who has the propensity to embrace Fascism if it enhances his immediate political agendas.
The other is very knowledgeable, very intelligent, very thoughtful, and possesses the gifts of communication in his quest to help build a better society. This one is also bravely cutting a path through the political mind fields while exposing his sexual preferences for the word to see and possibly better understand.
The former is human garbage, while the later a human treasure. Little to no comparison between the two. Well except I guess,.. they both have penises. But that is where any similarities and/or comparisons end.
It seems odd anyone would bring the two up as a valid reason for legitimate comparison.
MuseRider
(35,165 posts)#2 What does seeing a naked lady or her parts have to do with anything? Our parts are our parts not meant to be used by anyone to make a point.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)But, I try to be a bit more tolerant of others...
MuseRider
(35,165 posts)Jesus is a choice.
Lunabell
(7,309 posts)Try finding any written records of his trial and execution. Romans kept scrupulous records of such matters. And they don't exist.
magicarpet
(18,464 posts)... pontificate about his or anyone else's private areas and plumbing systems.
The only time he handles his - is likely to go pee or if the mood strikes to self pleasure (you get it, masturbate). That right there is a bit pathetic, and a down right waste of Viagra - one would think and agree without much arguement.
It might be best if Lindsey just buttoned his lip and practiced MYOB. Get your own house in shape before you go criticize an other's lack of immaculate orderliness.
Response to Name removed (Original post)
The Unmitigated Gall This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lunabell
(7,309 posts)Making fun of someone's alledged sexuality because you don't like their political stance is NOT funny.
Response to Lunabell (Reply #14)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.
