Too Big To Indict?
Will Trump ever be indicted?
Very few would expect the former president to be indicted before the next election. They believe it could adversely affect the election results. That seems to be the general consensus.
Are his crimes too serious to simply ignore? Could they be neglected to the point where there could be a possible backlash from voters? A "toothless tiger"?
For the sake of justice and democracy, it is a necessary requirement.
However, the question is, "When?"
Will it be after the J6 Committee finish their work? Or does it not matter?
The problem is that if they go too long without an indictment, there is the pitfall of a possible backlash by voters.
The people desire justice and their patience is in limited supply.
= new reply since forum marked as read
... then we're giving up and Chump won, just like that.
We can't roll over and let him win. We have to call him on every single lie, and every single bluff.
It's going to take time but Chump will be indicted, he will stand trial. There won't be a "civil war" because the Repukes already know the mofo is guilty as hell.
AND, there is undeniable proof of human trafficking, including children.
As a footnote, here's another insight into their strategy (TrumPutin).
https://caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/how-to-defeat-putin
How To Defeat Putin
"The Kremlin and Russian state media are aggressively pushing a baseless conspiracy theory blaming the United States for damage to natural gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea in what analysts said Friday is another effort to split the U.S. and its European allies," AP tells us. "The Russian position is also reverberating on social media forums popular with American conservatives and far-right groups."
OKAY, as ALWAYS, Every Accusation is a Confession.
The Author concludes:
Well, this is going to blow your mind because of how wildly counter-intuitive it is, but here's the answer: Russia.
This is according to such ever-impartial and totally trustworthy experts as former CIA director John Brennan, who says that "Russia certainly is the most likely suspect," and NATO think tanker Alexander Vershbow, who says Putin blew up his own pipelines instead of simply closing a valve because he wanted to show the world that he is a "madman".
"The sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines further reinforces the image of Putin as madman, which might persuade some allies to push for a ceasefire and negotiations that would inevitably mean Ukraine giving up significant amounts of territory," Vershbow told The Atlantic's Susan B Glaser.
NOW! WHO ELSE IS GOING COMPLETELY BONKERS?
A certain mister TFG, and
Michael Flynn: GOP Governors Will Declare War
Now, I'm not going to endorse the "madman" theory, but just note that in dealing with the MAGATS here, one is dealing with a cell of the Putin Organization, and plenty of links can be made.
This is all a Russian plan. Started years ago.
https://pastebin.com/raw/evbnN5y7
Whether this is holding things up, or anything else imaginable or unimaginable, I don't know.
But delay in attacking an evil never seems right to me.
Unless it's to lure the enemy into a trap, which is risky, and while it may exist, I don't see it, especially when there are obvious and (IMO) easily provable crimes front and center, which are among the largest and vilest in U.S. History.
Sometimes, discretion is the better part of failure.
like every other accused guaranteed a speedy trial? It is time to act against his delay tactics and get him into court!
THEY NEED TO INDICT THAT FUCKER FOR AT LEAST ONE OF HIS THOUSANDS OF CRIMES 
