***Per DOJ filing: missing White House call logs found at MAL***

[pnwmom]

Link to tweet

Here is the court filing:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.40.0.pdf

[OAITW r.2.0]

1. Oh boy, here we go.

Direct connection to the Insurrection.

[empedocles]

4. Ah. Correlating the callers/callees, with timelines. Hmmm.

[ShazzieB]

42. You're a poet and don't know it! 😉

"Direct connection
To the Insurrection."

YEAH!

[Harker]

57. I'm hearing Gil Scott Heron.

"The insurrection has been televised..."

[calimary]

65. Good one!

[TigressDem]

69. But even though they are TFG phone records while pRes. THEY STILL BELONG TO THE PEOPLE, yes?

JUST because they PROVE he was talking to people during the insurrection, does not mean he had the right to hide them.

[Ocelot II]

2. This is interesting!

[Effete Snob]

12. You think he made 39 pages of calls on 1/6?

What is the basis for assuming the log has anything to do with 1/6?

[Ocelot II]

13. I'm not *assuming* anything. What I think is interesting, though,

is that he took the logs in the first place. Why?

[Effete Snob]

16. The notes are probably the interesting part

He made so many “perfect calls”.

He was impeached over a phone call to Zelensky. His calls around that time are likely illuminating.

[triron]

22. Of course not 39 pages but I bet some are.

[Pobeka]

30. He a narcissist. He probably ogles over them like family photos, proving how clever he was...

[NullTuples]

40. Exactly! It's so telling, that he didn't destroy evidence that would make him look bad

For a narcissist, destroying them would be admitting he'd maybe done something wrong.

[Evolve Dammit]

58. Yes, why? Could have just flushed them and destroyed possibly incriminating records?

[druidity33]

15. Who says only calls from the 6th are missing?

If Trump didn't want people to know who he called and when he called them... I'm pretty sure he'd just steal the records if he could. So, maybe he did.

[Cosmocat]

55. I would assume the "white house" call logs

Mean more than just him.

And, I imagine a lot of calls were made that day.

[InstantGratification]

56. He didn't make that many calls

But those logs are for every call that went through the White House switchboard, outgoing and incoming and not just TFG's calls but everyone else too.

[Cosmocat]

62. I would assume the "white house" call logs

Mean more than just him.

And, I imagine a lot of calls were made that day.

[renate]

3. I wonder whether the committee will add this to the next hearing or have a whole extra one

I hope we get a whole extra one!

[OAITW r.2.0]

5. Definitely. 2 days after the next one.

Nail this down now, before the elections.

[dweller]

6. Has the next been rescheduled?

Hope there is more than 1


✌🏻

[chowder66]

19. Nothing set in stone yet.

[dweller]

21. Tentative date

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142976957



✌🏻

[wnylib]

53. Is there a time of day for that hearing?

[moosewhisperer]

50. Jan 6 committee doesn't have this

Only FBI has this (for now).

[Wednesdays]

7. K&R.

[sheshe2]

8. Not surprising.

Take him out.

[Tetrachloride]

9. glad there are people willing to be lawyers

there are too many commas, appendices and parentheses for my taste.

[evolves]

10. WHEN DOES THIS MF GET ARRESTED?!?!

[Effete Snob]

11. Utterly nothing in that filing connects that material with 1/6

I doubt he made 39 pages of calls on 1/6 and then annotated the log.

Nothing in that document says Jack Shit about 1/6.

[druidity33]

17. Neither does the OP. She's posting a tweet...

you know, for discussion.

[pnwmom]

18. Thanks. And the person who tweeted is asking some valid questions, IMHO. n/t

[triron]

25. Connect the dots? ⁹

[Kingofalldems]

14. Kick this one.

[COL Mustard]

20. YUGE!!!

Now I have to go back and read the article! 😀

[LiberalFighter]

23. Why would they be privileged?

[pnwmom]

29. Some might be attorney-client privileged, if they were between Trump and a private attorney.

[dchill]

24. Whaaa?!?! You gotta be shitting me!

If it's what you say it is, I LOVE it!

[kimbutgar]

26. Sorry to be junvenile but........Lock him up! Lock Him up!

[MyOwnPeace]

31. Actually, I consider that to be a MATURE response.....

one that WAY TOO MANY are not strong enough to state.......

[niyad]

27. Do I remember correctly that, unlike real presidents, he refused to release call

logs and visitor logs almost the entire time he was squatting in, and soiling, the PEOPLE'S HOUSE??

[pnwmom]

28. That's what I remember, too, at least about visitor logs. nt

[Grins]

32. I might understand a copy...

…of the call records, but the actual records?

Who requested the originals?

How were they deleted from the file?

Who prepared and delivered them into the bloody, tiny hands of the orange ogre?

[Rhiannon12866]

33. Twitter reply:

Link to tweet

[pnwmom]

38. If any of the notes on the logs refer to communications with DT's private lawyers, they could be

attorney-client privileged.

[usonian]

45. IANAL, but an attorney and client who conspire to commit a crime lose A/C privilege.

Even if the attorney goes unpaid.

[pnwmom]

46. That's true -- but it wouldn't happen automatically. It would have to be litigated.

And for all we know there are some attorney/client calls on the log that have nothing to do with Jan 6 and are protected.

[usonian]

47. I plead double IANAL. The metadata of all calls made on duty (the who and when) may be public info.

regardless of content.

[pnwmom]

48. Yes, the metadata. But I specifically mentioned "notes." n/t

[usonian]

49. Sorry, it's late. Thx.

[AllaN01Bear]

34. im getting tired of sputter sputt sputt , delay and so fourth. when are we going

to NAIL this dufuss.

[triron]

35. When DOJ gets ready I guess.

[Cha]

44. TY.. I trust the DOJ & Not

those trying to ruse them.

[Hermit-The-Prog]

36. Thanks for the link to the pdf!

[Ford_Prefect]

37. If it walks like a duck...

[kentuck]

39. Sounds like the DOJ is being super cautious not to break any rules regarding atty/client privilege?

They have seven questionable boxes locked up by the Privilege Review Team that the Case Team has not seen.

Including those calls and messages with "notes" on the side.

The way I read it, they will stay locked up unless the Court rules otherwise?

[KPN]

61. Yeah, that's what I got out of it too -- but reading the filing, there is nothing specific about

call logs that I can see. I'm pretty confused as to what this amounts to, if anything.

[Bayard]

41. Big K&R!

[Cha]

43. Educated Guess that DT did

steal them.

[ancianita]

51. THIS. Clear proof of guilt of seditious conspiracy.

[spanone]

52. K&R

K

[speak easy]

54. How many calls did he make to Putin?

[SKKY]

59. The very fact that he said he didn't want to return these because they would end up...

...with the committee, who would then turn them over to DoJ, is pretty clear obstruction of justice.

[Blue Owl]

60. Um, could someone please ARREST THIS GODDAMNED FUCKING CRIMINAL???

Jesus fucking Christ....

[LymphocyteLover]

67. He will be indicted, there's no question. But unfortunately it will take more time because they

have to get everything perfect.

[moniss]

63. Obvious obstruction

since he and his attorneys knew that these logs were being requested. The attorneys for the attorneys are going to need attorneys before we're much further.

[burrowowl]

64. Very interesting!

[LymphocyteLover]

66. Shit just got even more real

[Smackdown2019]

68. Obstruction of Justice...,.

Wonder if Congress holding cell big enough for trumps ego?