General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTown employee quietly lowered fluoride in water for years
https://apnews.com/article/health-vermont-fluoridation-climate-and-environment-375fe7224a329bafb7a6dfa7480b5750Town employee quietly lowered fluoride in water for years
By LISA RATHKE
RICHMOND, Vt. (AP) Residents of a small community in Vermont were blindsided last month by news that one official in their water department quietly lowered fluoride levels nearly four years ago, giving rise to worries about their childrens dental health and transparent government and highlighting the enduring misinformation around water fluoridation.
Katie Mather, who lives in Richmond, a town of about 4,100 in northwestern Vermont, said at a water commission meeting this week that her dentist recently found her two kids first cavities. She acknowledged they eat a lot of sugar, but noted that her dentist recommended against supplemental fluoride because the towns water should be doing the trick.
Her dentist was operating and making professional recommendations based on state standards we all assumed were being met, which they were not, Mather said. Its the fact that we didnt have the opportunity to give our informed consent that gets to me.
The addition of fluoride to public drinking water systems has been routine in communities across the United States since the 1940s and 1950s but still doesnt sit well with some people, and many countries dont fluoridate water for various reasons, including feasibility.
Kendall Chamberlin, Richmonds water and wastewater superintendent, told the Water and Sewer Commission in September that he reduced the fluoride level because of his concerns about changes to its sourcing and the recommended levels.
He said he worries about quality control in the fluoride used in U.S. drinking systems because it comes from China an assertion that echoes unfounded reports about Chinese fluoride that have circulated online in recent years.

Kendall Chamberlin
Farmer-Rick
(12,786 posts)The organization has always objected to floride. Not sure why except that it does promote the general welfare which is something Federalist Society members are against.
CurtEastPoint
(20,096 posts)pandr32
(14,307 posts)Use fluoride toothpaste. Brush teeth after eating.
Simple precautions and good habits.
Fluoride in water can be problematic.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/magazine/magazine_article/fluoridated-drinking-water/
that in the letters from other scientists responding, only one letter agreed with the article. All the rest disagreed because it is woo nonsense.
Last edited Sun Oct 9, 2022, 04:06 PM - Edit history (1)
I am a dentist who works in both Philadelphia and Delaware County Pennsylvania. The dental health of Philadelphia children whose water is fluoridated is excellent even if they only sporadically brush their teeth. The dental health of children in Delaware county whose water is NOT fluoridated is frightening bordering on dento-apocalyptic. The number of children I have seen with rampant caries down there is massive child abuse as far as Im concerned.
I have never in all the years Ive been in Philadelphia seen a child or a teenager, not once, who had that kind of decay leading to infection and tooth loss.
Im sick of this shit.
pandr32
(14,307 posts)I, however, have serious enamel fluorosis. I have had to have most of my teeth crowned or veneered. I was subject to water fluoridation and my children were not.
PCIntern
(28,582 posts)1 part per million. This happens in certain areas with high endemic fluoride in the water or if a parent over-administered fluoride drops.
If that is not the case, then you have a different issue which is not fluorosis.
pandr32
(14,307 posts)I never had fluoride drops from a parent.
My wish is that proper dental care be available to all (as well as health care) and that healthy food be prioritized in all neighborhoods over unhealthy. Underprivileged neighborhoods tend to eat the most refined, unhealthy foods. More than teeth are at stake.
Children do better with a healthy diet along with good health and dental care. Also vaccines.
yardwork
(69,643 posts)It's heartbreaking.
Mad_Machine76
(25,005 posts)is the lack of transparency/consent. If you oppose something, you present your arguments and rally to get the outcome that you want. But it should not be left to one person (or a small group of people) to unilaterally determine policy JMHO.
QED
(3,365 posts)GILBERT DISCOVERS FLUORIDE WITHHELD FROM WATER, PUTS 2 OFFICIALS ON LEAVE
Source: The Republic | August 23rd, 2012 | By Parker Leavitt
Gilbert has put two top administrators on leave and launched an internal investigation after officials discovered fluoride has been withheld from part of the towns water supply for at least 13 months.
Gilbert voters approved fluoridation 12 years ago after a heated debate on the controversial issue, and the task of adding the cavity-fighting chemical fell to Public Works Director Lonnie Frost, whose wife Shelley had led the opposition against fluoride.
Frost, along with Water Manager Chris Ochs, are now on paid leave while the town investigates how and why fluoride was not being added at Gilberts North Water Treatment Plant. Town Manager Patrick Banger could not immediately say whether it was done intentionally or by mistake.
Reports from 2009 and 2010 indicate the amount of fluoride in Gilberts water varied between 0.42 and 1.1 parts per million, well below the maximum allowable level of 4 parts per million. The 2011 report, however, indicates fluoride levels had dropped, ranging from not detected to 0.92 parts per million.
https://fluoridealert.org/news/gilbert-discovers-fluoride-withheld-from-water-puts-2-officials-on-leave/
Scrivener7
(60,071 posts)MissB
(16,344 posts)It seems to be a thing every few years in our state. The state has water systems do sit samples each quarter; the system measures the amount of fluoride in one sample and the state lab measures the amount in the other sample and someone somewhere compares the two values and lets the system know if their measurement is off.
The CDC did lower the recommended level a few years ago, which seemed to spur some cities to re-evaluate whether they wanted fluoride.
Also, its easy to determine where the fluoride comes from- the manufacturer has to disclose that info so you know if the chemical youre buying comes from a domestic source or not.
thucythucy
(9,153 posts)edbermac
(16,487 posts)One of the greatest movies ever made.
delisen
(7,422 posts)I thought Dr. Strangelove was a great movie but I consider it entertainment not science.
yardwork
(69,643 posts)That's why it was satirized in a movie in the early 1960s. Anti-fluoride hysteria was part of the anti-communist, white supremacist movement.
delisen
(7,422 posts)Yet I think that there are many reasons to re-evaluate the use of fluoride in drinking water today. One reason is that since the 1950s the number of products containing fluoride and number of topical applications of fluoride being administered by dentists has increased phenomenally. It is I believe valid to ask whether people are getting too much fluoride. I think the fairly recent decision to reduce the recommended amount of fluoride to be added to tap water may have been influenced by the widespread problem of fluorosis, the mottling of teeth in children and teenager.
Your statement succinctly summarizes that history.
We have not had much research on fluoride and the human body, other than teeth. We dont have much research on long term effects such as on bone health.
Aside from the issue of fluoride and reducing caries in children, there are ethical concerns about administering a medicine not beneficial to everyone through public water systems. The ethical issue has been raised more in Europe than in the US. In some counties they do not allow fluoride in tap water but fluoridated products are available.
Another ethical concern is the pressure to use water fluoridation as a substitute for dental care, particularly for poor children. In my city dental practices are located in more affluent areas and many poorer children rarely see a dentist. Yet despite fluoridation these kids have cavities.
These are just some of the reasons I have been investigating the water fluoridation issue. I am looking for research on bone health related to fluoridation, on dental health of poor children and fluoridation, and the issue of medical ethics.
Demsrule86
(71,555 posts)the dentist...yearly visits. After moving to an area where Fluoride was in use, I had no cavities period. I used fluoride toothpaste nowadays as well. I have excellent teeth...and as for poor kids, with or without fluoride, the dental care will be abysmal so let's at least keep their teeth cavity-free. Dental in this country is terrible for everyone really. This fear of reasonable amounts of fluoride in water to protect teeth is similar to the Anti-vax people. The guy in the story is likely a Rightie...and how dare he not inform the public...get rid of him. As for folks here, don't torture your kids with unnecessary cavities due to mediocre slanted research about fluoride.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)The people have rejected added fluoride many times over the years.
https://www.opb.org/news/article/portland-oregon-water-fluoridation-history-explained/
yardwork
(69,643 posts)Demsrule86
(71,555 posts)The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls the steep reduction in dental cavities due to adding fluoride to public water supplies as one of the top 10 public health achievements of the 20th century. It's an achievement not shared in Portland, or in most Oregon communities. Corvallis, Coos Bay, Beaverton and a few dozen other Oregon towns have fluoridated water. But everywhere else, community leaders have bowed to the scare tactics and unsubstantiated claims of people who oppose fluoridation.
https://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/2009/04/oregon_the_goto_place_for_toot.html
former9thward
(33,424 posts)I grew up in Portland and I have lived a number of different places. Some conservative, some liberal, some in the middle. Whether there is fluoride in the water has nothing to do with politics.
Demsrule86
(71,555 posts)It is mostly bullshit. You know bad teeth for poor kids is what Portland got with this policy.
Celerity
(54,878 posts)it long ago.
Currently about 372 million people (around 5.7% of the world population) receive artificially-fluoridated water in about 24 countries, including Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Republic of Ireland, Malaysia, the U.S., and Vietnam.
57.4 million people receive naturally occurring fluoridated water at or above optimal levels in countries such as Sweden, China, Sri Lanka, Finland, Zimbabwe and Gabon. Community water fluoridation is rare in Continental Europe, with 9798% choosing not to fluoridate drinking water.
It (adding it artificially) has been banned here in Sweden since 1971, after being legal for a brief time (and then only 4 cities chose to do so).
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,046 posts)wackadoo wabbit
(1,309 posts)Last edited Sun Oct 9, 2022, 11:26 PM - Edit history (2)
the latest research.
Here're a couple of references:
Potential Role of Fluoride in the Etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease
Here's the abstract:
Link to full paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320968/
Fluoride exposure and children's intelligence: Gene-environment interaction based on SNP-set, gene and pathway analysis, using a case-control design based on a cross-sectional study
Abstract:
Background: Excessive fluoride exposure has been associated with intelligence loss, but little is known about gene-fluoride interactions on intelligence at SNP-set, gene and pathway level.
Objectives: Here we conducted a population-based study in Chinese school-aged children to estimate the associations of fluoride from internal and external exposures with intelligence as well as to explore the gene-fluoride interactions on intelligence at SNP-set, gene and neurodevelopmental pathway level.
Methods: A total of 952 resident children aged 7 to 13 were included in the current study. The fluoride contents in drinking water, urine, hair and nail were measured using the ion-selective electrode method. LASSO Binomial regression was conducted to screen the intelligence-related SNP-set. The gene-fluoride interactions at gene and pathway levels were detected by the Adaptive Rank Truncated Product method.
Results: The probability of high intelligence was inversely correlated with fluoride contents in water, urine, hair and nail (all P < 0.001). The SNP-set based on rs3788319, rs1879417, rs57377675, rs11556505 and rs7187776 was related to high intelligence (P = 0.001) alone and by interaction with water, urinary and hair fluoride (P = 0.030, 0.040, 0.010), separately. In gene level, CLU and TOMM40 interacted with hair fluoride (both P = 0.017) on intelligence. In pathway level, Alzheimer disease pathway, metabolic pathway, signal transduction pathway, sphingolipid signaling pathway and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway interacted with fluoride on intelligence in men.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that fluoride is inversely associated with intelligence. Moreover, the interactions of fluoride with mitochondrial function-related SNP-set, genes and pathways may also be involved in high intelligence loss.
Link to this abstract on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34098334/
The full paper is behind a paywall, but it is available through SciHub. I'm not sure if posting links to SciHub is allowed, so I'm not doing it. However, if you'd like to read the full paper, please DM me for the SciHub link to the paper.
Personally, I'd rather my children have a couple of cavities than lower intelligence. But I guess that's just me. Your mileage, obviously, may vary.
ETA: I included a link to the second abstract on PubMed and explained that the full paper is behind a paywall but is available on SciHub.
Edit 2: typo
delisen
(7,422 posts)yardwork
(69,643 posts)delisen
(7,422 posts)On what basis do you dismiss this research?
yardwork
(69,643 posts)delisen
(7,422 posts)Are you rejecting research because the medical school is in Poland? Do you think they are not competent researchers?
Do you think the NIH should not be posting their research online?
Much of the research being done on fluoride is done in Europe and other countries outside the US
If you can, please take a moment to explain your laughter.
Demsrule86
(71,555 posts)First of all, it is a medical school that one can apply to online or have a change of career. It is not a research hospital from what I can tell.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,309 posts)Your sarcasm is only showing your ignorance.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,309 posts)That's why I said to DM me if you wanted to read the full paper.
I just edited my post to include the PubMed link to the abstract and to more fully explain why I didn't provide a link to the paper.
You were right to call me out on this. Science needs to be cited.
As for there being "no facts," I included the abstracts, not the full papers! Are you at all familiar with what an abstract is? There are plenty of facts in the papers, which you might want to avail yourself of. Let me know if you want the SciHub link for the second paper.
yardwork
(69,643 posts)JanMichael
(25,725 posts)Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Obviously this man is a psychotic
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)far fewer people are drinking tap water in America. We mostly drink our water from bottles. Wouldn't it be a good idea to put Fluoride in some brands of bottled water and let the people make their own decision? In my county of 60,000 people there are over 100 water providers, some serving as few as ten homes. None of them use Fluoride. I've lived here for over 30 years, and my teeth are deteriorating more quickly than they used to. Of course some of that is due to my age, but I have to wonder how my teeth would be if I had been drinking bottled water with Fluoride all those years.
meadowlander
(5,156 posts)A centralised reticulated water supply is a more efficient way to distribute water that everyone going though 8 disposible plastic bottles a day. If you fluoridate bottled water too you're asking the average Joe to work out how to dose themselves with the combination of tap and bottled water which will end badly.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)put the same amount of Flouride in the bottled water as in the tap water?
And I agree about the plastic bottles, but they do put water in biodegradeable cartons, too.
bedazzled
(1,891 posts)Estrogenic compounds are very damaging
moondust
(21,352 posts)Prevident 5000 Plus or generic SF 5000 Plus (available at Walmart and other pharmacies). Maybe others???
https://www.drugs.com/compare/prevident-5000-plus-vs-sf-5000-plus
I've used SF for years and believe it works.
delisen
(7,422 posts)Referencing pararagraph 6 in op:
China has areas where an excess of naturally occurring fluoride has led to bone deformities in children and other issues. China has banned the fluoridation of drinking water in all of China.
China does allow the processing of a form of fluoride to be exported to the US.
mahina
(20,713 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.