Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSteele dossier source acquitted, in loss for special counsel Durham
https://wapo.st/3yOu5K8 - no paywall
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trumps ties to Russia not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information.
The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBIs investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
Trump predicted Durham would uncover the crime of the century inside the U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies that investigated his campaigns links to Russia. But so far, no one charged by the special counsel has gone to prison, and only one government employee has pleaded guilty to a criminal offense. In both trials this year, Durham argued that people deceived FBI agents, not that investigators corruptly targeted Trump.
The jury in Danchenkos case deliberated for about nine hours over two days. Juror Joel Greene said in an interview that there were no holdouts in the deliberations and that jurors were pretty unanimous in how they viewed the case.
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trumps ties to Russia not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information.
The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBIs investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
Trump predicted Durham would uncover the crime of the century inside the U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies that investigated his campaigns links to Russia. But so far, no one charged by the special counsel has gone to prison, and only one government employee has pleaded guilty to a criminal offense. In both trials this year, Durham argued that people deceived FBI agents, not that investigators corruptly targeted Trump.
The jury in Danchenkos case deliberated for about nine hours over two days. Juror Joel Greene said in an interview that there were no holdouts in the deliberations and that jurors were pretty unanimous in how they viewed the case.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 554 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steele dossier source acquitted, in loss for special counsel Durham (Original Post)
spanone
Oct 2022
OP
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)1. Durham is another traitor trying to protect his orange Jesus.
rainin
(3,011 posts)2. Has anything in the dossier actually been debunked? Or is that right-wing propaganda?
My impression is that it hasn't been 100% proven, but, I'm unaware that any of it has been debunked. It seems that the voices on the right prevailed in widely discrediting it. Unfairly, IMO. Anyone know?
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)3. I haven't heard of any debunking. The pee tape thing in the
dossier was described as just a rumor.
Cartoonist
(7,323 posts)4. Technicalities
Like naming the wrong city.
GreenWave
(6,766 posts)5. But Danchenko has been named, pleasing Poo tin and IQ 45.