Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,094 posts)
Wed Oct 19, 2022, 12:58 PM Oct 2022

John Durham fails bigtime but confirms Donald Trump lied about Russiagate




https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/10/john-durham-fails-bigtime-but-confirms-donald-trump-lied-about-russiagate/

John Durham, the federal prosecutor handpicked by then-Attorney General Bill Barr in 2019 to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, flamed out this week, when he soundly lost another case in court, establishing an embarrassing 0-2 record in cases tried before juries. This verdict further discredited Durham’s crusade—much cheered on by Donald Trump and his cult following—to confirm Trump’s outlandish claim that the entire Russia scandal was a “hoax” mounted by the Deep State to sabotage him. After years of digging, Durham has failed to prove this baseless conspiracy theory advanced by Trump and his defenders to smother the narrative of Trump’s own treachery. Even worse for Trump, during this trial, Durham— intentionally or not—produced a bombshell confirming that Trump is a liar and that the proponents of the Russia hoax theory are hoaxers themselves. Few noticed.

Durham, who Barr secretly named as a special prosecutor weeks before the 2020 election, had been prosecuting Igor Danchenko—a US-based researcher who in 2016 supplied information to Christopher Steele that ended up in the so-called Steele dossier that assembled unconfirmed allegations related to Trump’s ties to Russia—for allegedly lying to FBI agents who had been investigating the dossier. It took the jury a little over a day of deliberation to find Danchenko not guilty on four counts on Tuesday. (The judge had previously tossed out one of the original five counts.)

This was a crushing defeat for Barr’s hitman—and for Trump. Yet after the first day of the trial last week, Trump defenders were enthused. Durham that day had called to the stand a senior FBI analyst named Brian Auten, who testified that the bureau had offered Steele “up to $1 million” to prove the charges in the collection of memos he had written for a research firm that was being paid by a lawyer working for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party.

Ah-ha! screamed the right-wing media (Fox News, the National Review, the Washington Examiner, and others) at this revelation. But Auten noted that no such sum was ever paid because Steele, as we already knew, did not corroborate the material in his memos. And as was already known (as Michael Isikoff and I reported in Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on American and the Election of Donald Trump), the FBI did offer Steele a $50,000 contract in October 2016—after he had shared his memos with the bureau—if he would work with the bureau. But this contract, like the “up to $1 million” payment, never happened. (Auten testified that the giant reward would only have been paid out if Steele had been able to substantiate the information and if it had led to a successful prosecution.)

*snip*
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Durham fails bigtime but confirms Donald Trump lied about Russiagate (Original Post) Nevilledog Oct 2022 OP
Say, wouldn't now be a good time to de-classify the full Mueller Report? gratuitous Oct 2022 #1
One would think! (nt) Hugh_Lebowski Oct 2022 #3
A very astute moniss Oct 2022 #4
Durham's job was to muddy the waters so as to give the right wing talking points that the Steele ... Botany Oct 2022 #2
the porcupine that lives on his face GenXer47 Oct 2022 #5
K&R UTUSN Oct 2022 #6

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. Say, wouldn't now be a good time to de-classify the full Mueller Report?
Wed Oct 19, 2022, 01:03 PM
Oct 2022

And not just the portions cherry-picked by the former guy's corrupt administration?

moniss

(4,231 posts)
4. A very astute
Wed Oct 19, 2022, 01:16 PM
Oct 2022

observation. The media at large have completely abandoned the call for the full report. Even reading the available version it is clear that many people knowingly and purposely obstructed justice by destroying e-mails etc. and evading accountability by using back-channels, encrypted apps and burner phones etc. Every single one of them should have had their name prominently exposed and be prosecuted.

Botany

(70,501 posts)
2. Durham's job was to muddy the waters so as to give the right wing talking points that the Steele ...
Wed Oct 19, 2022, 01:08 PM
Oct 2022

... Dossier wasn't true and to deflect from the proven story that Putin's Alfa Bank's server had >2,000
contacts with one of the Trump Campaign's server in Lititz, PA from April to Oct 2016.

And in both cases he was very successful.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/15/was-there-a-connection-between-a-russian-bank-and-the-trump-campaign

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Durham fails bigtime...