Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsForbes: DOJ Prosecutors Have Evidence To Charge Trump With Obstruction In Mar-A-Lago Case
Justice Department prosecutors believe theres enough evidence to charge former President Donald Trump with obstruction in the agencys investigation into documents he brought back to Mar-A-Lago, Bloomberg reportsbut investigators are reportedly still conflicted on whether its wise to charge the ex-president, and any indictment is unlikely to come soon.
A group of DOJ prosecutors believe that Trump could be charged with obstruction based on the evidence, Bloomberg reports, citing anonymous sources familiar with the investigation, but they have not yet made any formal recommendation on whether he should be charged to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who would make the final call.
If the DOJ does bring charges against Trump, it likely wouldnt be until after Christmas, according to Bloomberg, and would certainly be after the midterm elections on November 8.
The DOJ has alleged in court filings it believes efforts were likely taken to obstruct its investigation into Trump taking White House documents back to Mar-A-Lago with him, as the ex-president did not turn over all classified records when subpoenaed by the government to do so and allegedly concealed and removed documents from a secure storage room where investigators had asked him to keep all remaining White House documents.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2022/10/19/doj-prosecutors-have-evidence-to-charge-trump-with-obstruction-in-mar-a-lago-case-but-still-unclear-if-they-will-report-says/?sh=4db8dbe02d3f
A group of DOJ prosecutors believe that Trump could be charged with obstruction based on the evidence, Bloomberg reports, citing anonymous sources familiar with the investigation, but they have not yet made any formal recommendation on whether he should be charged to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who would make the final call.
If the DOJ does bring charges against Trump, it likely wouldnt be until after Christmas, according to Bloomberg, and would certainly be after the midterm elections on November 8.
The DOJ has alleged in court filings it believes efforts were likely taken to obstruct its investigation into Trump taking White House documents back to Mar-A-Lago with him, as the ex-president did not turn over all classified records when subpoenaed by the government to do so and allegedly concealed and removed documents from a secure storage room where investigators had asked him to keep all remaining White House documents.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2022/10/19/doj-prosecutors-have-evidence-to-charge-trump-with-obstruction-in-mar-a-lago-case-but-still-unclear-if-they-will-report-says/?sh=4db8dbe02d3f
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 645 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forbes: DOJ Prosecutors Have Evidence To Charge Trump With Obstruction In Mar-A-Lago Case (Original Post)
brooklynite
Oct 2022
OP
Goodheart
(5,345 posts)1. Oh for chrissakes
Fullduplexxx
(7,872 posts)2. Blahblablah
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,062 posts)3. "...citing anonymous sources familiar with the investigation..."
brooklynite
(94,757 posts)5. Are you saying they're making the story up?
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,062 posts)6. No, but I need more to go on than "anonymous sources"!
brooklynite
(94,757 posts)7. How many "anonymous sources" did you hear about President Trump from?
ProfessorGAC
(65,227 posts)9. Deep Throat Was An Anonymous Source
That seemed to be plenty to go on.
usonian
(9,909 posts)4. 8 little words from an MSNBC article: they are evidence of criminal conduct by Trump
kacekwl
(7,022 posts)8. If this is true
Oh never mind.