General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (traitorsgalore) on Sun Oct 23, 2022, 08:57 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
intrepidity
(8,582 posts)*unless you're a Dem....
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)And most likely won't happen.
Meanwhile there are multiple Grand Juries at work hearing testimony and examining evidence.
we can do it
(13,024 posts)StormKing
(243 posts)W was never prosecuted and he murdered 100,000 people for Republican PR.
One huge reason trump believes he can get away with sh*t as president is because W did.
And remember "Fitzmas?"
We have a right to be skeptical.
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)A blogger blew Fitzmas up to something bigger than it was based on a bunch of baseless speculation.
I am not aware of any case by the DOJ against W for murdering 100,000 people.
Of course you have a right to be skeptical!
But in the case of Trump your examples don't really apply. As I mentioned multiple grand juries at work on Trump at work.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)That may be the core of the problem. There is absolutely no grass roots pressure being brought on our leaders
IMHO, everyone here, including me, haven't done a thing in this matter.
StormKing
(243 posts)Voting Democrat... There is almost no choice. Very few then and definitely less now bang that drum. Maybe Bernie. There was this person names Tulsi but she's boosting MAGA now 😒
For public officials and unofficial "allies" in the media it's always been about forgive, forget, move on let's be bipartisan friends. That's been chum for attracting corruption since.
Honestly I think one big reason that W walked is because beyond the Obvious bigots in the GOP, there's another whole other chunk of Americans almost or just as big who did not then, and do not now see any Arab or Muslim as a bona fide human being.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)Response to emulatorloo (Reply #2)
traitorsgalore This message was self-deleted by its author.
rso
(2,673 posts)You will not see Donnie being arrested, his attorneys will be informed that hes been indicted and needs to show up for arraignment at a Court. Only if he refuses to show will he be actually physically restrained and taken to Court for arraignment.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)triron
(22,240 posts)DOJ can't see the forest for the trees.
Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #6)
traitorsgalore This message was self-deleted by its author.
Takket
(23,715 posts)it would "break precedent" to indict a presidential candidate
Response to traitorsgalore (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)With the evidence you have on hand, conviction ought to be a slam dunk for you.
Response to Kaleva (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Sewa
(1,608 posts)Will have their excuses ready. 💀🤙