General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere are those who are bashing Fetterman?
Well, let see how GOBers had missteps in their past?
The top ten in reverse order?
#10- Bush #2, he could put a sentence together at all?
#9- Rick Perry, debate stubble of the agencies he wanted to cut!
#8- Dan Quayle, couldnt spell potatoes!
#7- Marco Rubio, sweating and trying to drink water was an issues!
#6- Sarah Palin, well there is so many!
#5- Again Marco Rubio, stood like a statue when Val Demmings shredded his dignity!
#4- Trump, studering his way thru an interview!
#3- Trump, staring down Hilary in their debate!
#2- Hershel Walker, being used by Trump and the GOBers and pulling out a prop at their debate!
#1- all the GOBers, because they clam up when asked about fixing the issues they caused!
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)TheProle
(2,202 posts)but don't gaslight those who saw what they saw: a recent stroke victim mid-recovery who struggled mightily with articulating his thoughts.
I have more respect for those who point out his improving condition and the amount of remaining recovery time he would have before assuming office than those who say, "He did great, and you're a liar (or worse) if you don't agree."
See my sig.
gab13by13
(21,418 posts)This is what Magats want us talking about.
brooklynite
(94,757 posts)It may make his existing supporters feel better, but undecided voters in Pennsylvania won't be thinking of any of those others.
Zambero
(8,974 posts)Refusing to answer a simple question fron Crist as to whether or not he would serve a full term as governor if re-elected.
imanamerican63
(13,820 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,631 posts)John Fetterman could have skipped this debate due to his medical condition but showed up and got some good lines in. Many senators have had strokes and it is wrong to attack John Fetterman for his medical condition
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/pennsylvania-oz-fetterman-senate-race-n1299344?cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma
If having a stammer or a hearing impairment disqualifies someone from running or holding office, are we living up to the promise of democracy and government by the people? President Joe Bidens stutter has been the subject of ridicule and has been used to discredit him, but dont we want children with speech challenges to grow up knowing they can aim for any job, even the presidency?
Disabled Americans have the right to be represented, and most importantly, to work, and that includes working for the U.S. government. An employer wouldnt be allowed to refuse to hire a person because they have a hearing or speech difference, so why is it acceptable when it comes to holding office?
People with disabilities are one of the most underrepresented populations in local and federal government. You dont have to look far to understand why, when demeaning and discriminating them based on their disability is the accepted status quo. News outlets shouldnt be endorsing the idea that someone who has a speech or hearing impairment is less fit to serve. They should be questioning that logic. Replace disability with any other identity and the prejudice is clear.......
There are many reasons besides Oz's blatant ableism that make this tight race even tighter, with both campaigns ratcheting up the attack ads as Election Day approaches. But we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that disabled Americans shouldnt be scorned from running for office, they should be encouraged to. Strong candidates dont need to rely on ableism to win. If Oz wants a fair fight, he can stick to attacking his opponents policies rather than his disabilities.