General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWalker has had an unwavering 2-point lead 49-47* for MONTHS
Last edited Sat Oct 29, 2022, 07:13 PM - Edit history (1)
Based on whose poll? What questions were asked?
Data is not stagnant.
I no longer believe the poll at all.
From what I have seen people are appalled at Walker they are voting BECAUSE hes literally an insult to their intelligence.
As a result, Im convinced not only is Walkers poll bogus but many of the other stagnant polls are as well.
*Typo I initially wrote 42
no_hypocrisy
(46,060 posts)IOW, chose the winner before the election and discourage voters for the challenger as a fait accompli. And the poll makes its "prediction" into a predetermined reality.
ProfessorGAC
(64,951 posts)How is 49-42 a 2 point lead?
And, 49-42 doesn't come close to other polls cited here recently.
Something is amiss.
femmedem
(8,199 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)Gavin Newsom Has Reason To Worry.
JUL. 29, 2021, AT 6:00 AM
Recent polls show the race is tightening and Republican voters are more energized.
By Nathaniel Rakich and Geoffrey Skelley.
Filed under California Governor Recall.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/gavin-newsom-has-reason-to-worry/
Then when the results came in, and it was apparent to them (Not to me), that Newsom was blowing out Uncle Larry, on their podcast they made it seem like the only reason he beat Uncle Larry like a drum was because he wasn't tRump? Really? No governor is perfect, but they acted like all Newsom does is sit around and not do anything for California, who has one of the biggest economies (top 5) in the world.
I can't speak for how they viewed other races then to now, but as a life long Californian, 538 can kiss my grits
live love laugh
(13,091 posts)ProfessorGAC
(64,951 posts)Rebl2
(13,481 posts)two weeks ago on DU I read that Warnock had a 12 point lead. I must have misread.
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)WVGal1963
(145 posts)So I am a real skeptic when it comes to polls. Skeptic is probably too soft as a term.
Pollsters rely on many points of contact with the American citizenry, but they still have NOT determined a way to contact them with the avalanche of cell phones - - land lines were, for DECADES, the preferred point of contact. This is not to say that polling is obsolete. This is not to say that they are inaccurate all the time. This is just to remind everyone that they had to really start scrambling recently (
.like for the last 10-15 years
..) to determine new ways to get reliable information.
Combine technology with algorithms and social media nightmares/skewed biases/misinformation, etc. and points of contact with likely voters have become, in my mind, less and less reliable.
Polls seem to be much more fluid, and ever-changing now.
And, of course, all polls are paid for by some entity. Follow the money trail. That alone often explains the results or projections or predictions.
I feel like were in for a really wild ride this mid-term. Ill be up all night - - reading, listening, analyzing, and HOPEFULLY not wringing my hands - -
And may we all join hands and HOPE that ALL of our institutions hold this time.
Cheers, friends! Weve got this!!!
live love laugh
(13,091 posts)The poll I refer to is actually from the incessant fund raising emails I get. I actually didnt drill down to identify the specifics I was just triggered I guess getting yet ANOTHER email that the polls are unchanged at 49-47.
So maybe the fault lies with the solicitors too.
Hmmm 🤔
Wavelight
(391 posts)Georgia could go to a runoff. If that runoff determines Senate control, Walker wins. If Rs do not need it to control Senate, Warnock wins.