General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Bitecofer sounded somewhat optimistic.
Fingers crossed.
Quick political chat on Ruhle show, several reasons Dems doing some things right. Sorry didn't write any.
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)Please
secondwind
(16,903 posts)NJCher
(35,709 posts)The segment. I was watching but fell asleep.
Didn't write down, and returned to chocolate and oranges!
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)Just waiting for the doomers to pop in to say we are fucked, screwed and doomed.
elleng
(131,054 posts)(and my own chocolate and oranges.)
Indykatie
(3,697 posts)Check her history for the 2018 mid terms. I bet we hold the House and shock the world.
elleng
(131,054 posts)Many here learned about during the 2018 midterms.
*Bitecofer was recognized for predicting the size of the "Blue Wave" in the 2018 United States midterm elections much earlier than other forecasters.[2] She first predicted that Democrats would pick up 42 seats in the House of Representatives in September 2018,[7] revising her forecast to 45 seats in November,[8] just days before the election even as others were revising their estimates downwards.[2] Democrats ultimately gained 41 seats in the House election, making her prediction one of the most accurate of that cycle.[9] She then used the same theory to anticipate that Democrats would recapture the presidency more than a year out from the election.[10]
Following the work of Alan Abramowitz on a concept called "negative partisanship" Bitecofer's main thesis is that modern elections are not decided merely by the swing vote, but rather, what she calls "coalitional turnout" for each party. Negative partisanship, which argues voters are increasingly motivated by dislike, hate, and fear of the other party prioritizes defeating the other side over any specific policy objective.[2] Under this theory, shifts in voter turnout between cycles are critically important to each party's success. Along with a small swing each cycle among "pure" independents (independents that do not "lean" towards either party, another important and overlooked "swing" is what Bitecofer dubbed the "turnout swing" which comes from whether voters decide to vote at all rather than deciding who to vote for. This view has been criticized by other political analysts like David Wasserman of The Cook Political Report, with others such as Kyle Kondik of The Crystal Ball and Sam Wang offering more support.
Bitecofer argues that instead of ideology, Democratic candidates should "lean in" to being Democrats and abandon the preference of Democrats to nominate unobtrusive, "Blue Dogs" who run against their own party's brand. The fact that progressive favorites like Stacey Abrams and Beto O'Rourke often came much closer to winning their races in red states in 2018 than Blue Dog moderates who tried to ingratiate themselves with Trump has been held as validation for her theory.[2] As has the successful campaigns of Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff in Georgia[11] and Mark Kelly in Arizona.'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Bitecofer