General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsdoc03
(35,361 posts)find a jury that would convict him, even if he shot someone on 5th Avenue?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)vlyons
(10,252 posts)I don't just think that he is guilty, I KNOW that he is guilty. Then again I would have lost the opportunity to sit on his jury. And which of us could pass that up?
LisaL
(44,974 posts)NT
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Better Days Ahoy
(698 posts)Just to be one of those who would convict regardless of the evidence. Yeah, not the idea, but I doubt any jury is 100% open-minded.
I once served on a Monmouth County jury in Freehold, NJ. Good percentage of yahoos who wanted to "teach that young kid a lesson" by convicting despite the showboating ADA's poor job of presenting the case. Yahoos started making up alternate scenarios to use as conviction rationales. Attacked me as not understanding the issue because I didn't have kids.
I told them that they absolutely weren't a jury of my peers and then I hung the jury with one other juror. Not a popular person but didn't give a shit.
Bottom line: I'll go against my own jury member values to convict the Orange Anus.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)and reach a decision in his case purely on the evidence presented.
I believe in the principal of fair trials and would act accordingly.
Tetrachloride
(7,865 posts)simple