General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe big polling shift the final few weeks wasn't real
Link to tweet
Unrolled thread here
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1592610318475141120.html
Really important thread: We now know that the big polling shift the final few weeks wasnt real. The polls were roughly correct before that final shift. Yet that fake shift set off a chain of events that may have directly cost the Democrats the House majority and 52 Senate seats.
First, when every major news outlet (including major left-leaning news outlets) is yelling red wave down the stretch, it suppresses the vote. The average person is less inclined to go vote for their side if theyre being told theyre going to get blown out anyway.
Democrats lost the Wisconsin Senate race by just one point. If the media hadnt been suppressing the vote by yelling red wave theres a strong argument to be made that the Democrats would have won that seat. That, plus the Georgia runoff, would be 52 Senate seats.
Its also an easy argument to make that the Democrats could have won 218 House seats, instead of 215-217 seats (or whatever the final total ends up being), simply due to the media suppressing Democratic votes by yelling red wave.
But theres more.
It turns out the Democrats won the Senate races in Pennsylvania and Arizona by five points each. And the polls told us that with a few weeks to go. But then the polls suddenly and falsely claimed those races were TIED, so we had to dump huge last-minute resources into them.
If we hadnt been forced to play defense in Pennsylvania and Arizona, we could have put more last-minute resources into other Senate races.
And if wed known we were down just one point in Wisconsin, and not 3.5 points, wed probably have put much of those resources there.
The House math is always more complex because there are 435 races and at least 60 tend to be competitive. But the media yelling red wave and suppressing the vote surely cost us at least a couple of the tightest House races. And thats the House majority.
Heres the crucial part. We know Republicans commissioned bunches of polls in the final weeks showing them hugely overperforming. Only some of the media hyped these fake polls.
But around that same time, the real polls also went insane and the media unanimously hyped those.
And now the election results prove that the legitimate polls were more or less correct *until* they suddenly went sharply red in the final weeks. That shift was imaginary. Voters werent changing their minds in those final weeks. Legitimate pollsters just started blowing it.
The question is why. A few weeks before the election, legitimate pollsters panicked and began changing their polling sampling or methodology in a way that was much more favorable to Republican candidates, and made their work far LESS accurate than it had been. Again, why?
There is *no* reason to suggest that legitimate pollsters, many of whom have reputations to protect or work for major universities, would ever tank their polls on purpose. I would never buy that. But what would spook them into mistakenly tanking their own polls down the stretch?
Something presumably caused the best pollsters out there to say with a few weeks to go wait a minute, what if weve had this wrong all along, what if a red wave is coming, and adjust their methodology accordingly.
Did legitimate pollsters see all the Republican-commissioned polls showing huge (imaginary) last minute Republican gains, and panic about their own polls perhaps being wrong?
Did legitimate pollsters just hear red wave on TV too much like the rest of us, and fell for it?
Or is it something more innocuous, where pollsters didnt actually change the questions they were asking, but the Democratic-leaning voters being polled were just depressed and were telling pollsters they were less likely to vote because they were hearing red wave on TV?
We also keep hearing about how Hochul supposedly dragged down the entire New York Democratic ticket. But the House results in California are just as unexpectedly bad for the Democrats as they are in New York. Cant blame Hochul for *California* elections.
If I had to *guess* right now Id say that Democratic voters in New York and California got depressed when they heard liberal media outlets yelling res wave and stayed home because being in a very blue state makes people instinctively feel safer from Republican extremism.
Then theres how the Republicans specifically focused on commissioning fake polls showing Hochul and Zeldin TIED. Hochul won by seven. That race was never competitive. She was never in trouble. But that false narrative presumably drove right wingers to the polls
under the false belief that they could finally get a Republican Governor of New York. That surge didnt elect Zeldin. But it was enough to flip three tight House races in upstate New York. And you have to wonder if THAT was the goal of the pro-Zeldin polls.
At the time, I wondered if the fake polls were coming from incompetent Republican campaign strategists who wanted to make it look like their losing candidate was winning, to muddy the waters so when they lost the blame would go anywhere but the incompetent strategist.
But now I wonder if it wasnt something more. The Republican-commissioned fake polls appear to have directly prevented the Democrats from winning the House majority and 52 Senate seats. Are we supposed to chalk that up to just dumb luck on their part? Maybe. Maybe not.
The answer is always in the numbers, and the ability to crunch them correctly.
Theres a LOT of research to be done here, in order to figure out who changed what, when, and why and Im not that kind of number cruncher. I would urge number crunchers to dig in and figure it out.
Its not about this election its over, and in the big picture we won anyway. Its about 2024. The Republicans succeeded in weakening our 2022 wins just by releasing a bunch of polls falsely claiming they were winning. Whether it was strategy or luck, theyll now try it again.
At some point in 2024 maybe three weeks out, maybe in the primaries just for kicks Republicans will flood the market with fake polls showing insane results. When it happens well need the media not to take the bait, and well need legitimate pollsters to stay the course.
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)Damn shame as we would probably had a real "blue wave".
W_HAMILTON
(10,332 posts)You absolutely were NOT helping Democrats by doing that -- you were amplifying Republican efforts to depress Democratic turnout.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)posting...discourage the voter and they don't turn out. I am still pissed about this...Criticizing Katie Hobbs and John Fetterman became an artform really. And all the posts that Cherie in NC and Barnes in WI were going to lose became a self-fulfilling prophecy if you ask me. And the GOP polls were sacrosanct, but of course, they were a pack of lies. I was attacked multiple times for posting positive news and pushing back on the polls.
Meadowoak
(6,606 posts)karynnj
(60,959 posts)Showing the same thing as the non partisan polls. He is a very connected person who worked D elections going back to Bill Clinton.
The fake polls did drive a media narrative, but likely not a DCCC or DNC strategy .
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Wounded Bear
(64,307 posts)Sympthsical
(10,960 posts)Which is to say poor, with a minimum of data, lots of speculation, peppered with a little conspiracy theory, and a lack of understanding of basic election and polling infrastructure of the Democratic Party.
So, well done there . . .
progressoid
(53,168 posts)Celerity
(54,373 posts)The Palmer Report is an American liberal fake news website, founded in 2016 by Bill Palmer. It is known for making unsubstantiated or false claims, producing hyperpartisan content, and publishing conspiracy theories, especially on matters relating to Donald Trump and Russia. Fact-checkers have debunked numerous Palmer Report stories, and organizations including the Columbia Journalism Review and the German Marshall Fund have listed the site among biased websites or false content producers.
Evaluation by academia
Political scientist Alan Wolfe wrote in 2019 that Trump's connection with Russia "has created a wide-open field for leftist conspiracy theorists to make one wild claim after another; nearly all of them...can be conveniently found on a website called the Palmer Report. In a 2019 report from the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, the Palmer Report was described as a "left-leaning dubious-content site" where many of the articles "range from the unsubstantiated...to the sophomoric."
David G. McAfee's The Curious Person's Guide to Fighting Fake News described the Palmer Report as a website that "provides skewed content featuring sensational headlines and stories with unverified conspiracy theories". In Yochai Benkler's 2018 book, Network Propaganda, found that the Palmer Report (along with Occupy Democrats) were the "clearest examples" of left-wing sites that adopted the "hyperpartisan strategy" of successful right-wing sites in 2017. David Greenberg, a professor of history and journalism, identified the Palmer Report as a "junk-news" site and a source not to be trusted. Brendan Nyhan believes with sites like the Palmer Report, the left risks "poisoning" the Democratic Party.
Abolishinist
(2,953 posts)The Palmer Report is an American liberal fake news website, founded in 2016 by Bill Palmer. It is known for making unsubstantiated or false claims, producing hyperpartisan content, and publishing conspiracy theories, especially on matters relating to Donald Trump and Russia.
Fact-checkers have debunked numerous Palmer Report stories, and organizations including the Columbia Journalism Review and the German Marshall Fund have listed the site among biased websites or false content producers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Report
progressoid
(53,168 posts)Nevilledog
(55,075 posts)Abolishinist
(2,953 posts)Then theres how the Republicans specifically focused on commissioning fake polls showing Hochul and Zeldin TIED. Hochul won by seven. That race was never competitive. She was never in trouble. But that false narrative presumably drove right wingers to the polls.
Presumably? Based on what? How many are there of those who presumably were driven to the polls, i.e. they would NOT have voted otherwise. After all, she still won by seven. Perhaps a survey is needed to see if this was a factor.
As far as "fake" polls are concerned, the Trafalgar Group, for example, was one of the few to accurately call the 2016 presidential race, yet in 2022 they sucked big time across the board. It could be entirely attributed to their methodology, which appears to be quite different than most, working then but completely out of date six years later.
And on a personal level I dont get the my candidate is behind in the polls so Im not going to vote thing. I see voting as my civic duty, so I always vote. Beyond that, and partly because Im in California, besides voting for Governor and Senator and Representative this time around there were 27 other items on the ballot, not including another 16 that were rather frivolous. So there's always a reason to show up.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)So yeah I think that the Palmer report would have been more useful than these bozo's on the right who had fake polls that when you looked at their internals were worthless...and of course, Trafalgar doesn't share information...if 538 includes these polls and RCP going forward, I will never look at those websites again.
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Salas and Gray. The onslaught was insufferable. 5 or 6 ads every break. Where were the dem are? Especially since they knew this district might have been competitive. Salas is at 47% but the count hasnt moved in days.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)send money to individual candidates but give the DNC and DCCC nothing...maybe it wasn't a wise decision.
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)In 40 years at least. The district was re-drawn so we will see how it shakes out. Valadeo was one of the reps who voted to impeach the bloated tick, so the psychos wont vote for him.
I dont know where the tallied vote is from geographically or Id have a better idea of where the race could be headed. I assume no one does since the race hasnt been called.
BigmanPigman
(55,117 posts)That is why I kept posting on DU, "IGNORE THE POLLS"! It was obvious, even to a moron like me, what the fuck was going on with all the supposedly unbiased polls and the BS all over the news. $$$$$$$ is what drives them, not democracy. The greedy M$M will print any BS as long as it keeps people angry or in fear. Playing on voters' emotions is why they do what they do...all for ratings $$$$$$$. There is no "Liberal media", it is all "Greedy Media" which has no political affiliation with anyone or anything unless it means more and more and more $$$$$ for their owners. Michael Moore's words kept me sane when everyone around him (including the "liberal media"
said there would be a Red Wave.
GoodRaisin
(10,899 posts)Cheezoholic
(3,718 posts)I watch polls for trends but inside 30-45 days the trends are usually 95% set. It takes some kind of truly ground-shaking national or international political nuke, or as in this case, P.T. Barnum inspired nuclear bullshit, to change the direction of the river of trends that have been establishing that flow for 6 to 8 months.
When you treat political polling like some ass clowns twitter feed this is what you get
Farmer-Rick
(12,643 posts)It truely amazes me how we Americans who are subjected to probably more advertising then any other people on this planet are so easily manipulated by it.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)EarnestPutz
(2,843 posts).....coming out of the midterm elections. The right started with gerrymandering to their advantage years ago, turned it into a high art form, now goes after mail-in ballots, ballot drop boxes, voting hours, voter registration, the post office, Secretaries of State, election officials, poll workers, voting machines, dropping off someone else's ballot and anything else they can think of to limit the number of ballots and votes the majority party can have. Now they go after the polls, trying to pervert the national discussion prior to the election, again in an attempt to limit how many people show up at the polls. They know that they don't have the numbers to compete fairly. All they got is cheating and low information voters.
bedazzled
(1,885 posts)I turned them both off and won't watch either again.
Still love lawrence though
moondust
(21,285 posts)Old Cynic suspects corporate media lusting for tax cuts using manipulated polls to create a narrative to energize a certain base and demoralize the other base into apathy.
I haven't trusted polls since the end of universal landlines when incoming calls were free.
peppertree
(23,326 posts)We should go to at-large House seats - like a number of states had back in the 19th century.
But as long as Repugs find gerrymandering so advantageous, it's unlikely to heppen.
Marthe48
(23,167 posts)I also donated and volunteered time, because no matter how the elections turn out, I know I did everything I was able to do to support my candidates, and our rights.
Something to keep in mind is that the candidates who are elected by the people in their states don't just represent that state. They end up representing all of us. If the majority elected get there by hook or by crook, then their representation is tainted, and they will not listen to the voice of the people.
My new plan is to continue to hammer home the r plan to get rid of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and marriage equality. I have to years to keep pressing those points, and I sure will!
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)we will lose.
PXR-5
(578 posts)since I was polled for anything, not just politics, but TV shows, automobile quality etc.
Interesting, because my Republican "friends" say the same thing.
Aussie105
(7,907 posts)Hell no!
Do polls try to manipulate reality?
Hell yes!
No such thing as an unbiased poll result or a neutrally worded poll question.
Better to ignore polls and ads on TV and have your own reasons for voting the way you want to.
Polls suck, political reporting in the media sucks, only what you decide on is of any value.
Some countries have bans on exit polls and any TV or other media ads, discussions, editorials for political purposes for a number of days before voting starts.
And don't get me started on negative TV ads, you know the ones . . . I have no policies myself except negative ones, but my opponent really sucks!
RainCaster
(13,692 posts)The Main Stream Media is no more trustworthy than any other media.
Don't trust social media, it's a lie.
Don't trust MAGA media, it's a lie.
Don't trust far left media either, it's a lie.
Don't trust MSM, it's a lie.
Farmer-Rick
(12,643 posts)I'm asking seriously. None of the corporate media ever goes far enough to the left for me. So, maybe your far left media does.
AdamGG
(1,881 posts)It wasn't just Trafalgar & Rasmussen that reported the shift away from Democrats in the final few weeks, it was also NY Times/Siena, Emerson College and other not right leaning pollsters.
Maybe there was a shift toward Republicans that was starting to happen (as is common for the non-Presidential party in midterm years), but then when Trump started making highly publicized appearances in the last two weeks, it caused another final shift away from them at the end that the polls didn't capture.
It was pretty disconcerting to see Trump suddenly plastered over media at campaign rallies again, crowing how beautiful things were going to be after Tuesday and that he was about to announce his own 2024 candidacy on the heels of the tremendous Republican wave that was about to happen.
That could have knocked down the Republican numbers from what they would have been if Trump hadn't jumped in.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)They showed Kelly losing as well in Arizona...they said we would lose a senate seat in Colorado...none of that happened. And normal/non-partisan polls never projected any of this. These polls that showed the GOP had 'closed' were partisan polls that were created to lower the Democratic vote and the media swallowed it in a big way...even some of our folks believed it. And none of it was ever true. There never was a red wave.
Joinfortmill
(21,127 posts)Phoenix61
(18,827 posts)I get gerrymandering, closing polling stations, limiting early voting, preventing mail in voting are all done to suppress the vote. But if all it takes is some talking head saying the other side is going to win weve already lost. How many sports teams show up when the odds are stacked against them and play their hearts out?
bucolic_frolic
(55,094 posts)AdamGG
(1,881 posts)and North Carolina and Ohio had polled closely up until the last month.
leighbythesea2
(1,291 posts)Flood the zone with sh*t. That.
FakeNoose
(41,582 posts)Those of us who voted by mail (the vast majority are Dems) are impervious to all the last-minute game-playing that these media outlets are trying to pull. We've already voted by the time they start playing their stupid games.
If we haven't voted - well, at least we know who's getting our vote, so it still doesn't matter.
I can't believe the news media - including MSNBC - that think we're that stupid and that naive. My TV stayed off for most of the time because I got sick of all the "red wave" talk, all the "Joe Biden has terrible ratings" talk.
Here's what I know - political polls are meaningless because Repukes always lie in them. That's their big joke, lying to pollsters and pretending to be Dems. Meanwhile Dems are (mostly) too smart to answer the phone and tell strangers who they plan to vote for.
It's impossible for polls to be correct because they aren't getting any real answers from anybody.
I'm so happy this season is OVER!
BornADemocrat
(8,178 posts)The polls getting close seemed an aberration to me and motivated me to vote even more than I already was.
Turns out the tied polling for NH Senate on election day was a massive aberration, Hassan won by 9 points!