Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEmptywheel: the pluses/minuses of a Special Counsel
Marcy has mixed feelings, but as usual, provides a balanced analysis.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/11/18/merrick-garland-names-war-crimes-prosecutor-jack-smith-to-oversee-trump-investigations/
To my mind, the best part of appointing war crimes and public corruption prosecutor Jack Smith as Special Counsel to oversee the twin investigations into Donald Trump is that it will be a cinch, now, to subpoena Ginni Thomas.
Otherwise I have mixed feelings about the decision. I think the letter of DOJ guidelines requires it. But I dont think it will change how much of a clusterfuck Trump makes of it.
It does have certain other advantages, other than making it easier to subpoena Ginni. It might even make it easy to subpoena Mike Pence.
First, this will make it very easy to refuse Jim Jordans demands for information about the investigation.
It will ensure the continuity of any prosecution after 2025, no matter who is elected (neither hypothetical Trump prosecution the stolen documents or the coup attempt would be done by then, even if it were indicted on December 15, the earliest possible day for either).
I dont think this will create much of a delay. The stolen documents case, which is the first that could be prosecuted (assuming the 11th Circuit overturns Judge Aileen Cannons special master order) is fairly self-contained, so would only take a day to be briefed into. The coup attempt is far, far more complex, but I think there was no way Trump himself would be indicted before February or March anyway, probably longer.
(Snip)
Mostly, I think this is an Eh decision. It doesnt change Garlands role in the process. I dont think it delays things. I think it carries certain ad advantages, two of those named Ginni and Jim.
Otherwise I have mixed feelings about the decision. I think the letter of DOJ guidelines requires it. But I dont think it will change how much of a clusterfuck Trump makes of it.
It does have certain other advantages, other than making it easier to subpoena Ginni. It might even make it easy to subpoena Mike Pence.
First, this will make it very easy to refuse Jim Jordans demands for information about the investigation.
It will ensure the continuity of any prosecution after 2025, no matter who is elected (neither hypothetical Trump prosecution the stolen documents or the coup attempt would be done by then, even if it were indicted on December 15, the earliest possible day for either).
I dont think this will create much of a delay. The stolen documents case, which is the first that could be prosecuted (assuming the 11th Circuit overturns Judge Aileen Cannons special master order) is fairly self-contained, so would only take a day to be briefed into. The coup attempt is far, far more complex, but I think there was no way Trump himself would be indicted before February or March anyway, probably longer.
(Snip)
Mostly, I think this is an Eh decision. It doesnt change Garlands role in the process. I dont think it delays things. I think it carries certain ad advantages, two of those named Ginni and Jim.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 904 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Emptywheel: the pluses/minuses of a Special Counsel (Original Post)
Fiendish Thingy
Nov 2022
OP
GenXer47
(1,204 posts)1. if they bring down Ginni
I will forego the tonic water!
intrepidity
(7,296 posts)2. How? How, exactly, does it make it easier to subpoena them?
Wasn't it already easy enough? Failure to comply is the issue.
Also, doesn't SC still only refer prosecution to DOJ? So it def does matter who is prez in 24.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,607 posts)3. It depends on how the SC orders are drafted
Marcy thinks it protects the prosecution of Trump from meddling, just as Durhams prosecutions were protected (although in the end it was only one defendant for one charge).
From my reading Smiths appointment is more comparable to Durham than to Meuller.
republianmushroom
(13,590 posts)4. I like it
hlthe2b
(102,263 posts)5. I appreciate her analysis. n/t
mcar
(42,323 posts)6. Marcy's analysis is usually spot on
I will take her word on this.
crickets
(25,976 posts)7. My favorite sentence in the entire piece:
First, this will make it very easy to refuse Jim Jordans demands for information about the investigation.
On reading that, I immediately heard a little oompah band start playing a triumphant tune in my head.