Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewHendoLib

(60,026 posts)
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 05:17 PM Nov 2022

DU temp check on the Garland - Special Counsel news


41 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
This is a good thing - will lead to TFG paying for his crimes
18 (44%)
This is not a good thing - will be another example where TFG gets away with it
8 (20%)
This is a good thing, but TFG still may skate
2 (5%)
Too soon to tell
12 (29%)
Other
1 (2%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DU temp check on the Garland - Special Counsel news (Original Post) NewHendoLib Nov 2022 OP
Ocelot says it's good. SheltieLover Nov 2022 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author maxsolomon Nov 2022 #2
thank you! NewHendoLib Nov 2022 #4
A very good thing. H2O Man Nov 2022 #3
I voted not a good thing, but I don't like the reasoning why. W_HAMILTON Nov 2022 #5
It's the Cyrus Vance gambit. Unexpected, but does the job Scrivener7 Nov 2022 #6
I'd go for a "fabulous" thing, but had to settle for "good." Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #7
My hope? "Too soon to tell". My gut reaction? "This is not a good thing." n/t Silent3 Nov 2022 #8
Doesn't really change much with me BannonsLiver Nov 2022 #9
It's not a good thing iemanja Nov 2022 #10

Response to NewHendoLib (Original post)

W_HAMILTON

(7,876 posts)
5. I voted not a good thing, but I don't like the reasoning why.
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 05:45 PM
Nov 2022

I think he will still ultimately get nailed, but I think this is just another example of "the good guys" bending over backwards to appease the obvious criminal when they would not treat anyone else with these sorts of kid gloves. Even if he gets ultimately indicted and convicted, he has received a benefit of the doubt that no one else would have ever gotten and certainly one that he himself did not deserve.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
7. I'd go for a "fabulous" thing, but had to settle for "good."
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 05:53 PM
Nov 2022

This step is required by DOJ policy if indictments and prosecution are deemed warranted in such circumstances under DOJ policies.

This is marvelous news.

BannonsLiver

(16,506 posts)
9. Doesn't really change much with me
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 05:55 PM
Nov 2022

I had zero expectations Trump would ever be held accountable for his many alleged crimes and I still have no expectations that he will be held accountable. That’s less of a commentary on Garland, who I’m sure is entirely competent, and more of a commentary on how we do things here.
However, I do see some value in the SC approach. I just don’t think it changes the ending to the story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DU temp check on the Garl...