"I can think of no-one better suited than Jack Smith"

[brooklynite]

Link to tweet

[LetMyPeopleVote]

1. A war crime prosecutor is a good choice

[Pantagruel]

2. Larry likes it !

I predict the "Garland gripers" won't be satisfied.

[WA-03 Democrat]

6. It's not Garland

It the pain of the very last veil of that we are a nation of laws has been proven false. Equal justice never existed in this country and will not because Trump and his minions are above the law.

Power is the law
We better use while we have it or it will be gone.

President Biden this is a death match. Go Joe!

[AZSkiffyGeek]

7. When did they decide not to indict Trump?

I must have missed that news in all this talk about appointing a special prosecutor.

[soldierant]

21. Boy, you got that right.

It's a step toward prosecution, not away from prosecution
.
The announcement came just after the emblodened GOP House began crowing about their plans to "investigate" (translation: harass and impede, maybe even impeach) everyone in the Biden administration who has accomplished anything positive. Garland was specifically named, ampng others. They won't find that so easy to do to a Special Counsel.

And then there's the three Grand Juries which have been convened.

But no, if one has made up one's mind that Garland is total loss, nothing that happens will change that, indeed anything that happens will be taken to support that.

[Joinfortmill]

26. I have complete faith Garland will get his man.

[paleotn]

23. They won't be satisfied ever.

[exboyfil]

3. I thought Doug Jones

Don't know as much about Smith, but his background looks solid.

[WA-03 Democrat]

4. I think he's

just a fucking SUIT.

[agingdem]

9. seriously??

Jack Smith has the bonafides..prosecuting international war crimes isn't like arguing a drunk driving charge in night court....Garland was wise to keep the Trump investigations far away from li'l Napoleon Jim Jordan..Jordan can haul Garland before his committee of buffoons and screech insults every day of the week but the weasel can't touch Jack Smith and the investigation...Smith answers only to Garland..

[Justice matters.]

10. He didn't prosecute W & Dick Cheney...

All I need to know.

[Evolve Dammit]

29. Same guy?

[soldierant]

22. Thank you.

You're the first person I have found (besides myself) pointing this out.

[WA-03 Democrat]

27. Yep

the entire cast and crew are back on the case again!

Merry Fucking Fitzmas Season 24 Episode 423

[TwilightZone]

11. Then you know nothing about him.

A common theme, today.

[paleotn]

24. We'll remember that comment.

Bookmarked.

[SledDriver]

5. No-one better suited than Jack Smith. Vast experience... blah-blah-blah

And in a few months, when Jack Smith decides NOT to indict, it'll be Fitzmas all over again!

[orangecrush]

12. We aren't there yet.

[ancianita]

8. There you go. I'm with Tribe.

[Kid Berwyn]

13. The guy is TOPS!

Quit a job prosecuting war criminals at The Hague to take this gig.

Dimdonnie won’t know what hit him.

[Joinfortmill]

14. It's done. It's a good indication of indictment

[Native]

15. And this is why I'm still on Twitter.

[Cha]

17. Yes. One of the

Many tweets for me too.

[Cha]

16. Excellent news!! nt

[gab13by13]

18. Happy to see Laurence Tribe being quoted.

[mcar]

19. The fact that he resigned from his job

as a war crimes prosecutor at The Hague to take this role fills me with confidence - and a sense of joy bc of the coming TrumpCo implosion.

[iluvtennis]

20. Yes!!! n/t

[TeamProg]

25. Thanks for posting. n/t

[oswaldactedalone]

28. Merry Fitzmas!!

Bottom line, Teflon Don skates again. Garland sucks.