General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConscience question: Would you vote for Walker to hold the Senate?
What if Walker was the Dem and Warnock was the Republican? What if the R's had 50 seats and the D's had 49? Would you vote for Walker in order to hold onto control of the Senate?
That question really isn't as hard as it seems. It really comes down to: "Would you vote for a total imbecile in order to save democracy?"
My guess is that I'm pretty sure I'd hold my nose and vote for Walker. How about you? Could you actually walk into a voting booth and cast a vote for someone who doesn't know the meaning of democracy, in order to save democracy,
(Fortunately, Dems would never nominate someone like Walker, so we'd never have to face that problem. But it tells us a lot about what the insanity of the Republican Party.)
BlueGreenLady
(2,887 posts)I am a "yellow dog Democrat".
ColinC
(11,098 posts)GOPs question is flipped: it comes down to whether they would vote for a total imbecile to destroy democracy.
Prairie_Seagull
(4,688 posts)It would depend on what the horizon looked like. A decade or 2 or 3 ago I don't think so. Now all bets are off.
patricia92243
(12,975 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)in the Democratic Party.
In would think Dems vetted candidates better than the GOP.
GoCubsGo
(34,911 posts)The theory is doubly flawed. He's a real Christian, rather than the Elmer Gantry types that infest the GOP. Not to mention that he supports civil rights for all minorities, whether racial or those related to sexual orientation. He wants to give the poor a hand up, rather than punishing them for being poor. He would never make it as a Republican.
Ms. Toad
(38,635 posts)I made the mistake of holding my nose and voting for one on the state legislature. One is the few votes I regret.
brush
(61,033 posts)The party has gone nuts like republican party has.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)I would have. And this is exactly why so many Republicans will go vote for Walker.
ShazamIam
(3,129 posts)It was mere crimming, said to involve women and gambling versus being an embodiment of evil.
edit: add link, https://www.nola.com/300/article_e0a91c9b-122a-5150-8b78-81ffd66487bc.html
chriscan64
(1,789 posts)Edwin Edwards was a skim off the top kind of crook, not a destroy democracy to stay in power crook. His strategy to stay governor was to govern and give the people what they wanted. The trains ran on time. He lasted so long we had an expression, "Same ole guvana, same ole Saints."
The original hypothetical question is moot because Democrats don't put forth candidates with only name recognition and no governing experience or ability. The closest they came to that was Matthew McConaughey considering injecting himself into the race for Texas governor, the party was not down with that. The republicans have no qualms about this behavior, hence ex-running back with 2 years of college running for Senate. I seem to remember when you had to at least have a term in the House to even consider a run for Senate.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Pre Gingrich, when the Republican Party was sane, Id vote for Warnock. If that would give the current Republican Party the majority, Id vote for Walker.
brush
(61,033 posts)Do you mean that the way it's written?
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)From the current Republican Party. Weve seen what McConnel has done to the Supreme Court.
If we had a pre Gingrich, normal Republican Party, Id vote for Warnock, the Republican.
brush
(61,033 posts)And voting for either one is voting for who they are and what they stand for.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)If you don't want to read what I've said, I'll leave this here.
edhopper
(37,368 posts)of a Dem candidate like Walker.
rurallib
(64,688 posts)I would think our system would take care of such a problem.
50 Shades Of Blue
(11,389 posts)Cyrano
(15,388 posts)And it also defines today's Republican Party that has no conscience. They have no problem with putting up Walker, an incredibly ignorant man, and then gleefully voting for him. The fact that Warnock didn't win by 50 or 60 percent, and that we're now in a runoff, doesn't speak well for America.
50 Shades Of Blue
(11,389 posts)ETA: Just saw where Kemp is campaigning with Walker. UGH!
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)DFW
(60,182 posts)The major exception being that the balance of the Senate wasn't in play. It was for mayor of Philadelphia, where I was living and going to college.
The city Democratic machine nominated the sadistic, oafish and thoroughly corrupt Police commissioner, Frank Rizzo. The Republicans nominated a sacrificial lamb, Thatcher Longstreth. He was a soft-spoken Republican administrator. A bureaucrat who agreed to be their hopeless cause: a Republican running for mayor of Philly.
I voted for Longstreth anyway. I was not going to hold my nose and vote for Rizzo just because he was a Democrat. He soon switched to the Republicans, anyway, which is where he belonged in the first place.
If the race had been for Senator from Pennsylvania, and the Democrats had nominated Rizzo, I don't think I would have voted for him, regardless. He was such an odious figure, he belonged in the Republican Party anyway, and, once elected, nothing would have prevented him switching parties any more as a scruple-less Senator than as a scruple-less mayor.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)The OP posed such a straw man.
Cyrano
(15,388 posts)I didn't pretend it was anything else. The first two words of the first paragraph are "what if." Is there some kind of DU rule that I don't know about that you can't post a "what if" scenario?
Genki Hikari
(1,766 posts)Back when there were still some Dixiecrats hanging on to their party affiliation back in the day, was to write in someone. Anyone. One time I wrote in Bill the Cat. He was running for office. Just not that one, but close enough.
There was no way I could vote for an r. My grandmother would have taken a switch to me if I'd even thought about it. I got enough of that dang switch when I was 8 years old. No way I'd risk seeing it again at 18 or 22 or whatever.
DFW
(60,182 posts)Rizzo was huffing and puffing like a prototype of Trump without the speech eloquence (!!!). The guy was a complete thug. Longstreth was a pleasant, well-spoken bureaucrat. He might as well have been the friendly neighborhood librarian, or the guy at the supermarket checkout counter you hoped to get. During the debate, Rizzo adloibbed a bit, and said that Longstreth in the past had called him an oaf, a guy who loved cruelty, and some polite epithet meaning thug (I forget which). He asked Longstreth why he said those things about him?
Now, I was watching this with my two college roomies, who were friends of mine from our last year of high school. We were anything BUT of similar backgrounds. I was a white guy who grew up in northern Virginia, DC and Spain, they were two black guys, one from Lawrence, Mass, and the other from Norfolk, Virginia. But when Longstreth reacted to Rizzo's question with, "well, if the shoe fits, Commissioner....." we didn't hear the rest because the whole block was drowned out by our unison howling and shouting.
Longstreth was probably a one-of-a-kind Republican, but anyone who can come up with THAT good a riposte on the spur of the moment gets my vote.
LakeArenal
(29,949 posts)William769
(59,147 posts)LakeArenal
(29,949 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)
for political office just to show the other party what they could get away with.
And dont anybody dare point to Fetterman, who is recovering well from a stroke. He was a mayor, and he was Lt Governor.
What the hell was Walker after his football career was over?
mahina
(20,645 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)voters can be fooled into electing bad choices, especially primary.
BUT the real Raphael Warnock could never be the Republican candidate.
Your scenario has to have one of the kind of RW exremist traitors they're running. Would I vote for Walker over a Kari Lake, Doug Mastriano, or Blake Masters "named" Warnock? You bet.
In a heartbeat. Walker's amoral, amenable, influenceable and buyable. And probably only moderately conservative by nature. Send him to the senate for the Democratic caucus and leadership to deal with, including offering the usual deal of reelection support in return for legislative support.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)gulliver
(13,985 posts)And no.
Mr. Ected
(9,714 posts)This road to fascism is a rather new phenomena in the modern age, brought to us by Vladimir Putin and his boytoy, Donnie Trump. We may have run weakish candidates in the past but no one whose inclusion in Congress would tip the balance from a democratic state to a autocratic state, so the question is somewhat moot.
However, do I admire Liz Cheney for abandoning Republican MAGA candidates and campaigning and voting for a Dem in their place?
Now that's a big HELL YEAH.
No love for Cheney otherwise, but in the vein of the question asked, yes, if our democracy weighed in the balance I would cross party lines to protect it.
Cyrano
(15,388 posts)Wish there was a way to make it go viral. It might just give Trump a stroke, and piss off his cult to no end.
Mr. Ected
(9,714 posts)I don't know if I could handle the hero worship. LOL!
Genki Hikari
(1,766 posts)A few r types might have tempted you.
Maybe not often, but here and there, a few of them would.
Or see the example upthread of Rizzo in Philadelphia. Total monster. That would have been a write in entry from me. That's always what I did when I couldn't vote for the D, but I was allergic to voting r. Write in whoever.
Anyone wanting to know who voted for Bruce Springsteen in 1982--that was me, writing in a candidate because I couldn't vote for a racist pig D. Or an r. Similar animals, different smell.
Iggo
(49,927 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(13,291 posts)Hell, if the Repugs can put Thomas on the SCOTUS to sit silently like a rock for years (until one of the women justices dared to challenge a male during his oral argument, whereupon Clarence chastised her from the bench), then putting Herschel in a senate seat on our side of the aisle makes a lot more sense than handing the country over to a party that embraces a fascist agenda. I would rather be happy than right.
After all, we could keep Walker occupied watching reruns of his greatest football plays, and tutor him on the workings of government, like Billie in "Born Yesterday." Isn't that what TFG does with his rallies? Except for the tutoring part, of course. "I know more about governing than anyone else," I imagine he'd boast.
Ms. Toad
(38,635 posts)I figured the idiot could at least be counted on to vote with the Democrats. I was wrong and he introduced/sponsored some putrid bills. The smart, old school republican would have done less damage.
I don't know that I would repeat that on a national level.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)I vote Republican about 10 percent of the time. This would be one of those times
Polybius
(21,900 posts)My last time was Mayor Bloomberg.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)Polybius
(21,900 posts)No matter how much we like to think it's only them, we do it and they do it. Look at the 1994 DC mayoral race. Marion Barry had no business winning.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)bad bad person here.
niyad
(132,440 posts)akbacchus_BC
(5,830 posts)DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)I think, as brush first stated, that the question is flawed in the first place.
even if you reworded the concept, some of the answers could be used to claim it is a both sides issue.
That opens our side to being called hypocritical.
So, I think it is a question best left unasked. Instead, let the record speak for itself.
If forced to answer this type of question, I like brush's response.
Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)I wouldn't vote for someone who held a gun to his ex.
I wouldn't vote for someone who lied with compulsion. A hypocrite about every single things he stands for. I couldn't do it; it goes against my conscience.
The GOP has eternally hurt their credibility with candidates like him and Trump. They'll have long term effects.
akbacchus_BC
(5,830 posts)Norbert
(7,763 posts)Often times I was satisfied with the vote because even if he was right of center he/she was a decent person. This began to change when we had a Republican running for county recorder who lied about several things including her credentials. I dismissed her immediately but many didn't and she won. I've seen enough of this and seen the GOP getting more radical as years go by.
I have been voting straight line blue almost ever since the orange maggot was elected commander 'and' chief (lol). I can't guarantee that I didn't vote for a sub-atandard Democrat but the alternative is voting for a possible Youngkin-lite Republican that would show their true colors shortly after being elected.
I don't know if I could ever vote for Walker or a Walker-like candidate. He is so unqualified that the only way I could is if they were running against a MTG, a Mastriano or a Kari Lake.
By the way, the Republican candidate that was elected county recorder. The combination of the county getting bluer and the fact that she just wasn't very good at her job, she became a one-term County Recorder.