General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSamuel Alito Is Exactly Who You Thought He Was
B&SOn Saturday, The New York Times published a bombshell report suggesting that Alito might be less suited to a black robe than a novelty plush hot dog suit. In it, a prominent former anti-choice activist claims that Dobbs was not the first leak of a Supreme Court case with an Alito-adjacent outcome. In 2014, says the Rev. Rob Schenck, a fellow anti-choice activist named Gayle Wright tipped him off that Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, a pending case about exempting religious corporations from their legal obligations to pay for employees contraceptive care, would come down in Hobby Lobbys favor, and that Alito would write the opinion. Wright allegedly told Schenck this the day after enjoying a private dinner with none other than Alito and his wife, Martha-Ann, and three weeks before the opinion was released.
The Hobby Lobby leak story is only the latest bit of evidence that Alitos purported distinction here is and has always been meaningless, embarrassing horseshitpart of a transparent effort to repackage policymaking by judicial fiat as the product of anodyne legal process. The Courts 6-3 conservative supermajority makes it the most important source of right-wing political power in America today, and the life tenure its members enjoy protects them from ever facing consequences for cheerfully abusing it. Alito is and has always been what he has long insisted he is not: a loyal Republican foot soldier who happens to work across the street from the Capitol, instead of inside it.
Link to tweet
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,842 posts)Alito is a partisan hack. Alito hates being called a partisan hack and I do not pass up the opportunity to call this partisan hack by his correct description. Alito is ignoring stare decis to advance a partisan right wing nutjob agenda
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/alito-s-abortion-decision-showed-total-lack-integrity-n1300368?cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma
Alito similarly tried to minimize a memo he wrote in 1985 as a member of the Justice Department in which he voiced his opposition to Roe. Alito, according to the book, told Kennedy there was nothing to worry about the memo was simply a way to try to impress his boss and get a promotion.
Kennedy wasnt buying what Alito was selling and voted against his confirmation. That was wise. After almost two decades on the court, Alito had finally obtained enough conservative colleagues to join his crusade to overturn Roe to allow him to author this Junes Dobbs decision. In doing so, he wrote that Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. That doesnt sound like someone who believes in precedent or that Roe was settled law.
Just a day after the details of Kennedy and Alitos meeting became public knowledge as details from the book were published, Alito spoke at the conservative Heritage Foundation where he touched on a number of topics, including the public backlash during the courts most recent term. In response to a question about his draft opinion of the Dobbs decision leaking in early May, Alito said the breach of secrecy made him and his conservative colleagues targets for assassination......
But Alito and his colleagues seem to make decisions without regard to these consequences. Alito instead cherry-picked history and precedent to conclude that that women should no longer have a constitutionally protected right to abortion. In the process, Alito apparently broke his assurances to Kennedy, yet now clutches his pearls and plays the victim.
Alito misses the point if he thinks the crisis of legitimacy the Supreme Court faces is simply about people disagreeing with his rulings. The issue is his hypocrisy and willful ignorance of the harm his rulings produce
yankee87
(2,824 posts)We all know Alito has no morals and will take the country back to 1850 when only white men could vote and slavery was state right. Also after all three of the latest lied about Roe, committed perjury and are still there.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,842 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)He's done much damage and needs to be off the court.
SharonAnn
(14,172 posts)Opus Dei goes after judgeships in every country. They know thats where the ultimate power lies.
They want total control.
Bayard
(29,680 posts)Would also have to impeach Thomas, Kavenaugh, and Barrett. They're all rethuglican "christian," hacks.
SharonAnn
(14,172 posts)randr
(12,648 posts)A bad idea in any society.
Initech
(108,777 posts)SWBTATTReg
(26,257 posts)And these thugs (not all of them) beseech others to uphold the spirit of the law, to respect the law, the courts when decisions are made, etc. but it's damn hard to respect the law and those that ruled on laws (overturning, or whatever) being that they are grossly partisan in their decision making.
The spirit of the supreme court has been ruined by partisan hacks. No more, no less.
Pls. notice that I no longer will honor this court by capitalizing 'supreme court'.
Since they refuse to honor the true spirit of the wide and vast collection of laws that make the U.S. tick, and then willfully take a knife to long established laws (such as Roe vs. Wade and others) and slash through them/overturn them using false and ignorant reasoning? And then lying too, in the course of their duties by passing along word of what they've done to others (and actually trying to blame an unknown person who had leaked the overturning of Roe, when it was Alito).
I used to have massive confidence in this court. No longer. I guess the only hope that we have left is the vast body, the vast majority of judges that are currently out there on the bench, upholding the law. I don't have any confidence in the supreme court upholding any laws anymore, that their partisan hacks don't like.
Tommymac
(7,334 posts)And time to admit an ugly truth: Dems were partly complicit in that. We did not back Anita Hill as far as we could have.
And to be fair, those Senators did not realize at the time they were approving a package deal.
But it is also time to move on from that long ago mistake and try and put as much Truthful yet negative public pressure on Ginny The Terrorist and her puppet Clarence The Misogynist as we can.
Wild blueberry
(8,295 posts)Scalded Nun
(1,691 posts)bronxiteforever
(11,212 posts)as a legal scholar. I hope historians of the Court crap all over his legacy for centuries to come.
Baitball Blogger
(52,344 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)But he sure as hell doesnt belong on the high court of a country that since its founding has pledged to keep a wall of separation between church and state.
When he whines about religious liberty, that is the furthest thing from his mind. For him and his ilk, theres only one religion and the liberty is to worship at its altars and no others.
He took an actual oath to protect the US Constitution. He is foresworn of that oath. However, it is possible that oaths to Opus Dei are considered by them to override all others. Wrong he needs to be impeached.
czarjak
(13,639 posts)Bushie.
harumph
(3,278 posts)Nice to see others catching on.
msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)his confirmation. We engaged in intense campaigns against him being seated on the bench.
Petitions, telepone calls to our Senators, emailing, protesting on the streets across the country. Begging our D Senators to use every tool available to them to block his confirmation. I remember it well.
So many of us were not ever fooled by him.
The one thing I don't remember is that he worked in the Justice Department, until now. Either that bit missed my radar at the time, or I didn't consider it important in the scheme of things..
The war in Iraq was raging then, we had so many issues on our plate to fight against including the NRA, perhaps we should have combined that fight with the fight against the Federalists Society.
Exhausted thinking about it all, which may be the point. cuz that's how evil wins.
ck4829
(37,761 posts)That's Samuel Alito for you.