Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

USAFRetired_Liberal

(4,167 posts)
Mon Nov 21, 2022, 11:52 PM Nov 2022

California and New York

The Democrats not being able to gerrymander the hell out these states while Republicans are able to gerrymander Texas and Florida is really a big problem. Democrats would be in the majority with about 225 seats at least . Dumbest thing the people in Cal and NY have done. Yes independent redistricting commissions are a good thing and should be how all states operate, but you can’t unilaterally disarm when the other side doesn’t.

127 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California and New York (Original Post) USAFRetired_Liberal Nov 2022 OP
This is one of the big reasons why the republic won't survive. roamer65 Nov 2022 #1
This is exactly what I have been predicting for a long time. jg10003 Nov 2022 #6
I steadfastly believe NY and New England would quickly become Canadian provinces. roamer65 Nov 2022 #10
the point is that the union will be dissolved. What happens jg10003 Nov 2022 #11
Yup. It's going to happen. roamer65 Nov 2022 #13
I don't think so Cosmocat Nov 2022 #59
The military would split. roamer65 Nov 2022 #62
Leadership is overwhelmingly white Cosmocat Nov 2022 #81
Michigan is the most Canadian state in the US marmar Nov 2022 #39
Very true. roamer65 Nov 2022 #42
If there is an R POTUS and Cali tries to break they will 100% Cosmocat Nov 2022 #57
"A pro-independence referendum will pass and California will declare itself an independent nation." Iggo Nov 2022 #67
So true. We outnumber repubs but always seem to get outflanked by... brush Nov 2022 #2
California may have an independent redistricting commission... BlueCheeseAgain Nov 2022 #3
It worked that way in MI as well. roamer65 Nov 2022 #5
That CA commission is only 1/3 Democrats, and totally screwed Katie Porter. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #7
Rather misleading, as Katrie Porter did not represent CA-47 prior to running for the newly drawn Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #12
WTF is "misleading"? Katie Porter did NOT move, her district boundaries did. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #14
Yes, the district lines moved. But you showed a map for a district that Katie Porter Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #15
The map shows how CA 47 changed. What is so natural about only having rich beach towns...and Irvine? SunSeeker Nov 2022 #16
Again, Porter was not the Representative for CA-47. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #17
There is nothing natural about concentrating the rich white Republican vote. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #18
Wrong. The stated aim is to identify Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #19
Wrong. If that was so, why not keep Seal Beach with Long Beach, like it used to be? SunSeeker Nov 2022 #20
IMS the commision, which is supposed to act in a non-partisan fashion, is Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #22
What fucking "common interest" does Irvine have with Seal Beach?? SunSeeker Nov 2022 #23
I simply disagree. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #24
You refuse to say what that "common interest" or "fit" is. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #25
It wasn't a pro-Republican majority on the commission. That's false. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #27
Only 5 of the 14 members are Dems. That is a fucking pro-Republican majority. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #29
9 of the 14 members are not Republicans. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #31
No, 9 of 14 are not Dems. The "independents" on the Commission are Republican lite. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #32
Do you seriously not know what links Laguna Woods and Seal Beach? Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #34
I asked you why does Seal Beach form a "very natural district" with Irvine, as you claim. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #35
I asked you what Laguna Woods and Seal Beach had in common Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author SunSeeker Nov 2022 #47
OFFS, you're the one dodging questions. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #48
Seal Beach breaks slightly Democratic. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #51
Wrong. Seal Beach voted in Republican Michelle Steel as its House Representative in 2020. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #55
You conflated the voting of the district at large with that of Seal Beach. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #65
As I pointed out to you, with link, Seal Beach R's outnumber D's. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #68
Seal Beach voted for Biden over Trump. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #70
Barely. Trump raised our taxes by gutting the state and local tax deduction. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #72
Biden got a majority in Seal Beach. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #74
"I've never argued that the demographic in this area are not challenging." SunSeeker Nov 2022 #78
What's your problem? Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #79
Yesterday you said "Seal Beach breaks slightly Democratic." SunSeeker Nov 2022 #87
Which is correct. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #90
Nope, you never said why Irvine and Seal Beach have "common interests." SunSeeker Nov 2022 #95
I said Irvine is an integral part of northern coastal Orange County, which is the case. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #96
LOL. Irvine is not considered part of northern coastal OC, let alone an "integral" part. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #99
Seal Beach does have much in common with Long Beach. Not denying it for a moment. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #107
Seal Beach and Irvine do not have "economic integration." SunSeeker Nov 2022 #108
You are not posting in good faith. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #110
Disagreeing with you is not "posting in bad faith." SunSeeker Nov 2022 #111
Suggesting I desire for Katie Porter to have a tougher district is a flat out lie. Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #112
You just spent a week trying to defend the commission doing that to her. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #114
Speaking for my own state In It to Win It Nov 2022 #9
When voters are suppressed, it appears the suppressor is getting more votes. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2022 #26
Couldn't agree more. I've been saying this for a while now. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #4
In CA Zeitghost Nov 2022 #28
Only 23.9% of Californians are registered as Republicans. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #33
Registration is not the same as votes cast Zeitghost Nov 2022 #38
Republicans get more representatives in the House, per Republican voter, than Democratic voters get. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #40
I'm not sure what you're talking about Zeitghost Nov 2022 #41
This is what I'm talking about: SunSeeker Nov 2022 #43
Thats 2016... Zeitghost Nov 2022 #44
California is still counting. Where'd you get your 2022 numbers? SunSeeker Nov 2022 #46
It hasn't gotten worse Zeitghost Nov 2022 #49
So you have no link and you made up the 2022 numbers. Got it. nt SunSeeker Nov 2022 #50
You are more than free to challenge my numbers Zeitghost Nov 2022 #52
The complete numbers for 2022 are not out yet. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #53
It's not made up SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #54
California won't be done counting votes until Dec. 8. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #56
Numbers have been updated SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #60
Nov 16th Zeitghost Nov 2022 #64
Dec 8th SunSeeker Nov 2022 #69
If all remaining CA votes SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #71
We'll see. Projections aren't facts. nt SunSeeker Nov 2022 #73
I'm not talking about orojections SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #75
A handful of votes in CA Zeitghost Nov 2022 #76
It's not a "handful." And you now admit you were stating a projection, not the actual vote total. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #77
That's an awful analogy Zeitghost Nov 2022 #80
We'll see. nt SunSeeker Nov 2022 #82
That's just it Zeitghost Nov 2022 #83
Facts obviously don't matter n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #84
That's your opinion. nt SunSeeker Nov 2022 #85
No Zeitghost Nov 2022 #86
The numbers actually aren't my opiniom SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #88
The Cook's link is not the final total. CA is not the only state with lots of outstanding votes. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #93
Florida is already done SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #98
You're the one who won't accept numerical facts. "80-90% counted" is not fully counted. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #105
Where do you see SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #106
You'll have to do the math. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #109
Unless SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #116
It's 26 House races in NY. And each of those House ballots had the Schumer race on it too. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #119
Well... Zeitghost Dec 2022 #121
If you're that obsessed with this, add it up yourself. SunSeeker Dec 2022 #122
I've counted Zeitghost Dec 2022 #123
Cool story, bro. nt SunSeeker Dec 2022 #124
You've suddenly lost interest? Zeitghost Dec 2022 #125
I can wait for professionals with better access to data, like Brookings, to issue reports. SunSeeker Dec 2022 #126
Lol Zeitghost Dec 2022 #127
California Zeitghost Nov 2022 #63
The GOP can't win fairly. Laffy Kat Nov 2022 #8
The ultimate blame in all of this.... The Grand Illuminist Nov 2022 #21
spot on Cosmocat Nov 2022 #58
Speaking with my upstate NY family, bail reform did it mainer Nov 2022 #30
Bail reform didn't do it. 4 conservative NY judges screwed Democrats in NY. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #36
Just repeating what my independent-voting relatives said mainer Nov 2022 #37
In the NY House Elections: Zeitghost Nov 2022 #89
What link are you getting those numbers from? Reuters still does not have complete NY vote totals. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #91
As I said, I get numbers from various sources to populate my database Zeitghost Nov 2022 #92
LOL So you won't give me your "sources"? SunSeeker Nov 2022 #94
I've already showed you Zeitghost Nov 2022 #97
Truth n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #100
You haven't shown anything. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #104
CNN SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #101
CNN shows only 90% counted in the statewide Schumer race, just like Reuters does. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #115
But we're not talking about SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2022 #117
Schumer's race is a statewide race. It's a shortcut to adding up all the NY House races. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #118
Excellent analysis. Kid Berwyn Nov 2022 #61
Oh yeah, we suck. Iggo Nov 2022 #66
illinois dems did a bit of gerrymandering of their own orleans Nov 2022 #102
I agree 100% and I think in 2024 even with the deck Tribetime Nov 2022 #103
I think you're right. It will be a presidential election year, when there's greater Dem turnout. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #113
I lived in CA Old Crank Nov 2022 #120

roamer65

(36,744 posts)
1. This is one of the big reasons why the republic won't survive.
Mon Nov 21, 2022, 11:54 PM
Nov 2022

Good governance states like CA, IL, MI, NY, MN and the others are simply going to get fed up and leave this rapidly failing union.

States like AL, TX, FL, etc simply should have NO say in our affairs.

For instance, if they manage to pass a federal abortion ban, we should simply ignore it and jail any federals who try to enforce it.

jg10003

(975 posts)
6. This is exactly what I have been predicting for a long time.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 12:54 AM
Nov 2022

Biden will win the popular and electoral vote in 2024. However the GOP will use it’s control of state legislatures and congress to overturn the Electoral College and steal the election, thereby achieving their long-term goal of minority rule.

Shortly thereafter, many people in California will say; “we have over 10 percent of the population and economy bigger than that of France or England. But we're still taking orders from a bunch of old, white rednecks who think the earth is 6,000 years old.” A pro-independence referendum will pass and California will declare itself an independent nation, but there won't be a war. California will simply cease to participate in the federal government. Californians will be told that they do not have to pay federal income tax or obey federal laws, only California laws will be enforced. Federal employees can sit in their office and not be bothered, but any action they take will be simply ignored by the people and California government.

There is precedent for this type of passive non-cooperation. When Colorado legalized the recreational use of marijuana, it did so despite federal law prohibiting it. When the federal government was faced with the choice of either enforcing federal law or simply accepting Colorado’s decision, it chose the latter. The federal government could not prosecute the entire state of Colorado, and it certainly cannot prosecute the 40 million people in California.

Following California’s success New York and New England will join together and declare the northeast to be independent.

The south will happily agree to the succession of California and the northeast since they will now be rid of those godless coastal liberal elites. The south will then be able to establish what they have always wanted; a theocracy where all laws are based on extreme Christian fundamentalism, a Baptist Taliban.

The other states will align themselves according to their interests. The final result will be something like the following map.



roamer65

(36,744 posts)
10. I steadfastly believe NY and New England would quickly become Canadian provinces.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 01:12 AM
Nov 2022

Those two new provinces in Canada would give English Canada a land bridge from Ontario to the Maritime provinces, bypassing Quebec. These two new provinces would negate 99 pct of Quebec’s separation bluster.

Ottawa would also welcome Great Lakes states as it would seal their control of the Great Lakes Aquifer.


https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/is-it-time-for-canada-to-annex-blue-america/

jg10003

(975 posts)
11. the point is that the union will be dissolved. What happens
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 01:25 AM
Nov 2022

to the individual states afterwards is less important. There are many possibilities.

Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
59. I don't think so
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 09:07 AM
Nov 2022

If Rs gain control, no way in hell do the let a democratic state pull out, they will 100% use the military to prevent it and also use is as a rational to implement full authoritarian control. Not that isn't where it is headed anyways, but no way do the let a D state break out.

roamer65

(36,744 posts)
62. The military would split.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 01:45 PM
Nov 2022

It’s much heavier with minorities than it was years ago.

They would not side with right wing racist bullshit.

Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
81. Leadership is overwhelmingly white
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 05:33 PM
Nov 2022

at all levels, and they ain't liberal.

We reach the critical mass where some of them fall in w the cons, pretty much all will.

Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
57. If there is an R POTUS and Cali tries to break they will 100%
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 08:59 AM
Nov 2022

use military force against it.

While they can babble about breaking away at any times, under no circumstances will they allow democratic states to leave, and that would trigger their going full on, unabashed authoritarianism.

Iggo

(47,536 posts)
67. "A pro-independence referendum will pass and California will declare itself an independent nation."
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 02:31 PM
Nov 2022

No it won’t, and no it won’t.

brush

(53,743 posts)
2. So true. We outnumber repubs but always seem to get outflanked by...
Mon Nov 21, 2022, 11:56 PM
Nov 2022

them and their continual dirty deeds. If not for the woeful redistricting debacle NY we'd still have control of the House.

BlueCheeseAgain

(1,654 posts)
3. California may have an independent redistricting commission...
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 12:14 AM
Nov 2022

But its maps tend to favor Democrats.

In 2020, Biden got 63% of the vote, and Dems got 79% of the House seats (42/53).

And in any case, Republicans actually got more votes than Dems did this cycle.

roamer65

(36,744 posts)
5. It worked that way in MI as well.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 12:50 AM
Nov 2022

It was our first election with the independently redrawn districts.

Dems now outnumber Repukes 7-6…and we almost got 8-5.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
7. That CA commission is only 1/3 Democrats, and totally screwed Katie Porter.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 12:54 AM
Nov 2022

She came within a hair of loosing to a right wing loon. Why? Because the commission changed her district from a blue district to a red one. CA 47 was a relatively normal oval shaped district that was +6 Dem, that had relatively balanced coastal and inland areas. But after 2020, they totally changed the district into a weird albatross shape where the wings were the very white, very rich beach areas of Orange County going from Seal Beach to Huntington Beach to San Clemente. And the head of the albatross was the only part that poked inland, and only far enough inland to cover Katie Porter's house in Irvine. It's like McConnell or McCarthy drew the damn thing. It is a miracle Katie Porter eeked out a win. It is a testament to what a fantastic candidate she is, and what a loyal group of supporters she has, like me. I went knocking on doors for her during a heatwave in Republican Huntington Beach and it absolutely sucked. I was so worried she'd lose, considering how many hostile Republicans answered the doors. We need to disband that commission.



 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
12. Rather misleading, as Katrie Porter did not represent CA-47 prior to running for the newly drawn
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 01:26 AM
Nov 2022

district this November, she represented CA-45 (centered around her home in Irvine).

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
14. WTF is "misleading"? Katie Porter did NOT move, her district boundaries did.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 01:42 AM
Nov 2022

CA-47's lines are NEW.

Are you denying the commission took our star representive from a blue district to a red district?

Yes, she represented a blue district that included her house in Irvine. Then that fucked up commission created a new district that had a rather ODD shape--all rich white beach towns except the little head of the albatross that went in to cover her house in Irvine. Why the fuck did they do that?

And why the fuck is the commission only 1/3 Democrats----in California?!

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
15. Yes, the district lines moved. But you showed a map for a district that Katie Porter
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 01:51 AM
Nov 2022

has not represented. The old CA-47. That is misleading.

The old 45 (Porter's outgoing district) was a tough district, and the new CA-47 (her new district) is tougher yet.

I disagree that the new CA-47 is an odd shape. And a district that groups Irvine in with Huntington Beach, Newport, Laguna Hills, and Laguna Beach is a lot more "natural" a district that one that includes Irvine in with Santa Ana and Orange IMO.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
16. The map shows how CA 47 changed. What is so natural about only having rich beach towns...and Irvine?
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 02:56 AM
Nov 2022

That guarantees a Republican majority electorate. And guarantees hurting Irvine's Katie Porter.

Why the fuck would the commission do that?

Why is the commission only 1/3 Democrats?

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
17. Again, Porter was not the Representative for CA-47.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 03:29 AM
Nov 2022

She represented CA-45. Right?

Sometimes districts get substantially re-drawn and this is one of those cases.

If one knows the area--and I certainly do--Irvine has far more in common with what you call "rich beach towns" (despite including Laguna Hills/Laguna Woods) than it does with Santa Ana or Orange. That's pretty obvious.

Not at all strange that a non-partisan commission would have grouped these communities together, as they are a natural fit.

It does make it a somewhat tougher district.





SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
18. There is nothing natural about concentrating the rich white Republican vote.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 03:37 AM
Nov 2022

I live in her district. I know the area. Irvine is a lot of business and industrial parks, so what exactly makes it a "natural" fit with the rich beach towns? Why put all those rich white beach towns together? Why not put Long Beach in with Seal and Huntington Beach? Are we drawing districts by skin color?

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
19. Wrong. The stated aim is to identify
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 11:36 AM
Nov 2022

"which communities share common interests and should share common representation."

The new CA-47 is much more logical in grouping communities that share much in common vs one that would group Irvine with areas cut-out of Orange and Santa Ana.

This works against a partisan gerrymander our our parts--to be sure--but these new maps are the work of a commission that is charged with drawing districts based on communities of common interests.

You know better than this.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
20. Wrong. If that was so, why not keep Seal Beach with Long Beach, like it used to be?
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 02:02 PM
Nov 2022

I used to work in Irvine. Irvine has a lot more in common with Garden Grove, Tustin and Cypress, two other non-beach areas with a lot of industrial & business parks. What exactly is this "common interest" you keep saying Irvine has with the rich white beach cities? The main thing that ties Irvine to the rich white beach cities is its whiteness.

And why do you think it's OK that the commission is only 1/3 Democrats? How is that defensible in blue a state?

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
22. IMS the commision, which is supposed to act in a non-partisan fashion, is
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 02:17 PM
Nov 2022

5/14 Democrat, 5/14 Republican, and 4/14 Independent.

That's by intent. A process controlled by partisan Democrats *could have* gerrymandered more favorable districts for Porter and others, and I'm happy to stipulate that is the case.

But Porter's news district is one that totally makes sense if the mission is to link communities with common interests.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
23. What fucking "common interest" does Irvine have with Seal Beach??
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 03:21 PM
Nov 2022

And those "independents" on the commission might as well be Republicans, because that's how they act. I know the intent was admirable in the creation of a "nonpartisan" commission, but in practice it amounted to a unilateral disarmament to the Republicans.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
24. I simply disagree.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 03:46 PM
Nov 2022

The communities in the new CA-47 fit together well.

Do I yield the point that this district is a tough one for Democrats? You bet!

Could a process dominated by Democratic partisans have created a more favorable by gerrymandering? Absolutely!

But is this some weird district that lacks unity? Not a bit.

Katie Porter managed to take a seat that has a Republican lean, in the heart of once was a deep-red portion of Orange County. Kudos to her for that feat.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
25. You refuse to say what that "common interest" or "fit" is.
Wed Nov 23, 2022, 03:09 AM
Nov 2022

That is because the only "common interest" between Irvine and the rich white beach cities from Seal Beach to San Clemente is that they are all very white. The pro-Republican majority on the commission knew exactly what they were doing.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
27. It wasn't a pro-Republican majority on the commission. That's false.
Wed Nov 23, 2022, 10:50 AM
Nov 2022

The demographic of the district does tend to be affluent and white, and these are in part historic beach towns plus newer master-planned communities to the interior of those beach towns to that began to be built out starting in the 1960s. The district has a cohesiveness that is undeniable to an impartial observer. It is a community.

This area was once deep red Orange County. Now Katie Porter will represent the new CA-47.

Not a easy seat for a Democrat to win--I've never argued otherwise--but it isn't the nefarious sort of creation you seem to be suggesting.



SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
29. Only 5 of the 14 members are Dems. That is a fucking pro-Republican majority.
Wed Nov 23, 2022, 06:26 PM
Nov 2022

Why else would they carve out a rich white strip of beach towns and tack them on to Katie Porter's inland Irvine?

No rational, impartial observer would say Irvine and Seal Beach are "cohesive" or a "community." It is not "undeniable." Please stop with the gaslighting.

The fact that you continue to refuse to state what it is that makes it a "community" or have "common interest" is an admission that there is no common interest between the two towns, other than their whiteness.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
31. 9 of the 14 members are not Republicans.
Wed Nov 23, 2022, 07:37 PM
Nov 2022

Irvine, Laguna, Laguna Hills, Laguna Woods, Newport, Huntington Beach, et al. form a very natural district.

I'm not the one gaslighting here.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
32. No, 9 of 14 are not Dems. The "independents" on the Commission are Republican lite.
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 12:31 AM
Nov 2022

There are 5 Republicans and 4 NPP/independents on the commission. Only 5 are Democrats. California independents in general are much more likely to be moderate (44%) than liberal (29%); 27% of independents are conservative. https://www.ppic.org/publication/california-voter-and-party-profiles/

So why does Seal Beach form a "very natural district" with Irvine? I know you won't answer.

I live in Orange County, I know you are gaslighting.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
34. Do you seriously not know what links Laguna Woods and Seal Beach?
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 03:25 AM
Nov 2022

And you claim to be from Orange County?

And accuse *me* of gaslighting?

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
35. I asked you why does Seal Beach form a "very natural district" with Irvine, as you claim.
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 04:34 AM
Nov 2022

And as I predicted, you did not answer.

You've wasted enough of my time. It's Thanksgiving, I'm sure we both have better things to do with our time.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
45. I asked you what Laguna Woods and Seal Beach had in common
Fri Nov 25, 2022, 12:47 PM
Nov 2022

and instead of answering you dodged the question and responded insultingly.

Talk about wasting someone's time. Good grief!

If you believe that Democrats should gerrymander districts where we have the majority to the maximum extent possible, then why not just take that position openly?

Response to Just A Box Of Rain (Reply #45)

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
48. OFFS, you're the one dodging questions.
Fri Nov 25, 2022, 03:33 PM
Nov 2022

I asked you what Seal Beach and Irvine have in common. Repeatedly. You refused to answer, except to divert with the stupid question of what Seal Beach and Laguna Woods have in common, thinking I don't know the area. I fucking live in Seal Beach. I fucking know the area. You obviously don't. I know how conservative it is here. I was here when the local white Republican Nazi assholes rioted against a BLM march on Main Street in Seal Beach and punched BLM demonstrators.

The point is Irvine has no business being tacked on to rich white beach towns, nor old, white, very Republican retirement communities like Laguna Woods (or Leisure World in Seal Beach).

What I am calling for is doing away with California’s Redistricting Commission, or at least reform it so its membership is representative of how California votes. Right now, it is dominated by conservatives, like the NY Court. And those conservatives screwed Katie Porter by moving her into a more conservative district.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
51. Seal Beach breaks slightly Democratic.
Fri Nov 25, 2022, 03:48 PM
Nov 2022

The vote in the 2020 presidential election was 50.37% D vs 48.12 R.

Are you no aware of that? You claim to live there.

Why not just admit that it your desire to gerrymander the hell out of CA's Congressional Districts?

That's an honest position to have. Porter could have an easier district if her new district was gerrymandered by partisans.

But the claims that CA's districting is controlled by conservatives is hooey.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
55. Wrong. Seal Beach voted in Republican Michelle Steel as its House Representative in 2020.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 08:53 AM
Nov 2022

She beat incumbant Democrat Harley Rouda, turning our district red with 50.95% of the vote, when Seal Beach was in CA-48. https://www.ocregister.com/2020/11/03/early-election-results-show-harley-rouda-with-edge-over-michelle-steel-in-tight-race-for-48th-district/ But Steel is now in an even redder district. For 2022, the CA Redistricting Commission put her in newly drawn CA-45, where she was declared the winner, beating Democrat Jay Chen 52.4 to 47.6 at last count, a much higher margin than she had with Rouda

Seal Beach is 39.4% registered Republicans to only 36.7% registered Democrats.

https://ocvote.gov/datacentral/


Our City Council is very Republican. They have "In God We Trust" emblazoned over their seats in the the City Council chambers. And our police department has a big Blue Lives Matter flag painted on its station wall. And a big chunk of the Seal Beach population consists of the very conservative elderly residents of Leisure World. The city's nickname is "Mayberry by the Sea." The reason BLM & Long Beach based Caravan4Justice came here on August 29, 2020, to protest was because a newly arrived black resident was getting his front door pelted with eggs and nasty notes by the locals, and the police hadn't managed to stop the harrassment.

The CA Redistricting Commission is dominated by members who act like conservatives, whether they call themselves that or not. People have to be judged by their actions. These Commission members redrew OC to put Michelle Steel in a safer district, while screwing Katie Porter.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
65. You conflated the voting of the district at large with that of Seal Beach.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 02:14 PM
Nov 2022

Your own logic fails if you contend that adding Seal Beach to Porters district puts "Michelle Steel in a safer district, while screwing Katie Porter."

But whatever.



SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
68. As I pointed out to you, with link, Seal Beach R's outnumber D's.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 03:35 PM
Nov 2022

And it is your logic that fails. As I said, the commission, for 2022, put Steel in a REDRAWN (i.e. newly formed) district, as it did with Porter. But in Steel's case, the redistricting helped her, whereas it hurt Porter. Believe it or not, there are other red parts of OC besides Seal Beach. And the commission found them for Steel.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
72. Barely. Trump raised our taxes by gutting the state and local tax deduction.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 04:10 PM
Nov 2022

The Ds AND Rs didn't like that. And Trump did not campaign here or run any ads here in 2020. Michelle Steel did and she won. The OC Republican Party concentrated their money on the local races, where it could make a difference.

But we still have more Rs than Ds, and the city still leans R in general. Going by how Trump did in 2020 does not tell the whole story.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
74. Biden got a majority in Seal Beach.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 04:14 PM
Nov 2022

Majorities, even small ones, win elections.

I've never argued that the demographic in this area are not challenging.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
87. Yesterday you said "Seal Beach breaks slightly Democratic."
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 06:46 PM
Nov 2022

And that's after you insisted, Seal Beach naturally fits and has common interest with Irvine, while refusing to say why.

Seal Beach generally votes Republican, which is why the commission screwed Katie Porter when they tacked Irvine onto Seal Beach and a bunch of other Republican beach communities in OC.

But I'm glad we now both agree that Seal Beach is a "challenging" area for a Democrat.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
90. Which is correct.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:02 PM
Nov 2022

Seal Beach went narrowly for Biden over Trump.

I did not refuse to say what the district has it common. That's false. Go back and read my responses.

"This area" refers to the new CA-47. Northern coastal Orange County, of which Irvine is an integral portion. Not easy territory for a Democrat. Katie Porter is to be commended for her win.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
95. Nope, you never said why Irvine and Seal Beach have "common interests."
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 08:08 PM
Nov 2022

Nor are they an "integral part" of each other. They're not even close to each other. It took me 45 minutes to get home to Seal Beach when I worked in Irvine.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
96. I said Irvine is an integral part of northern coastal Orange County, which is the case.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 08:22 PM
Nov 2022

Traffic is hellish in many parts of California.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
99. LOL. Irvine is not considered part of northern coastal OC, let alone an "integral" part.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 09:56 PM
Nov 2022


Seal Beach has common interest to Long Beach as both are beach towns with tourists, and their residents shop in each other's town, and many Long Beach kids go to school in Seal Beach/Los Alamitos. That is why Seal Beach was always listed in the Long Beach Coastal phone book (that picture is my phone book) and was always in a congressional district with Long Beach, until now. Irvine was not in a congressional district with Seal Beach before the conservative majority commission tacked it on to conservative Seal Beach and even more conservative Huntington Beach. How "integral" could Seal Beach be to Irvine if it wasn't in its district before?

The two towns don't even share a border. Irvine is in central inland OC, a town of business and industrial parks, and planned developments filled with young professionals. Irvine does not rely on tourism. Seal Beach is an old, white, rich beach town. Seal Beach relies on tourism. The two towns do not have any common interest, other than both have a large white population. The commission screwed Porter.
 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
107. Seal Beach does have much in common with Long Beach. Not denying it for a moment.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:56 PM
Nov 2022

But they are in different counties, which may well have factored in the district maps. Otherwise, sure, Seal Beach and Long Beach are logical communities to group together.

Irvine certainly is part of northern coastal Orange County (despite not having any beachfront) and it shares a common watershed with Newport Beach. Irvine is natural part of coastal district, with common geography, economic integration (you worked there), the university, and a high-educated and affluent demographic that's common in the new CA-47.

The commission did not "screw" Katie Porter. That's false.

To reach out into Orange, Brea, or Santa Ana to find more Democratic votes would involve classic gerrymandering.

I don't blame you--if that's what you favor--but that's not the goal of California's commission that's in charge of redistricting.

They drew very supportable district lines. That area just happens to have a lot of Republicans, like it--or don't.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
108. Seal Beach and Irvine do not have "economic integration."
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 01:22 AM
Nov 2022

I quit my job there after 1 year because it was too far to drive; it was the type of job I could do anywhere, so I found another job closer. Nobody I know here in Seal Beach works in Irvine. In fact, nobody I know here in Seal Beach other, than 1 person, still works. They're retired, and well off.

Seal Beach is 5 minutes from Cal State Long Beach, that is the university it is associated with. It is not associated with UC Irvine, and certainly no UC Irvine students would schlep 45 minutes up the 405 to pay $3500 for a one bedroom apartment to live in Seal Beach. Irvine's young professionals are mostly in tech, because a lot of big tech companies have offices there. No big tech has offices in Seal Beach. Irvine used to be in a district with Santa Ana for good reason; they are ADJACENT. That is the opposite of gerrymandering. Parts of the Santa Ana River watershed covers parts of Irvine (and all of Irvine Lake in adjacent Silverado Canyon). There's also lots of big industry in Santa Ana, like there is in Irvine. There is no big industry in Seal Beach. There are lots of "high-educated" people all over Orange County, that is not distinguishing factor.

There's nothing supportable about tacking Irvine onto Seal Beach, nor detaching Irvine from Santa Ana. You obviously disagree, facts be damned, and have no problem with the commission putting Katie Porter in a tougher district, while putting Steel in safer district. Lucky you, you got what you wanted.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
110. You are not posting in good faith.
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 02:44 AM
Nov 2022

I don't want Katie Porter to have a tougher district and Michelle Steel to have an easier one, I just am not willing to be dishonest and claim that the new CA-47 district lines are non-organic or represent some sort of conservative gerrymander, when it clearly isn't the case.

I'm done with this discussion.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
111. Disagreeing with you is not "posting in bad faith."
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 03:10 AM
Nov 2022

I'm certainly not the only one who thinks what the commission did in OC was not right.

Good night.

 

Just A Box Of Rain

(5,104 posts)
112. Suggesting I desire for Katie Porter to have a tougher district is a flat out lie.
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 03:14 AM
Nov 2022

Last edited Sun Nov 27, 2022, 03:56 AM - Edit history (1)

Goodbye.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
114. You just spent a week trying to defend the commission doing that to her.
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 04:02 AM
Nov 2022

If that was not your desire, you sure spent a lot of energy trying to insist that it had to happen.

In It to Win It

(8,225 posts)
9. Speaking for my own state
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 01:09 AM
Nov 2022

Republican getting more votes doesn’t justify the blatant disregard of the rules. They got more votes so sure, they should logically get more House seats. However, they have to do that within the written rules. In my home state of Florida, I’m sure we all know the story. Partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional in the state of Florida and they did it anyway. I believe the same is true in Ohio with their state constitution.

They should get more seats by getting more votes within bounds of the rules of the game.

The reason they are able to squeeze extra seats from Florida is that courts refused to intervene which let them break the rules, and meanwhile the NY court stopped Democrats for breaking the rules. The Maryland court stopped Democrats from breaking the rules. To the Ohio Supreme Court’s credit, they did strike down Ohio’s Republican gerrymander but it was too late. The maps were already in use for their primary.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
4. Couldn't agree more. I've been saying this for a while now.
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 12:36 AM
Nov 2022

Last edited Thu Nov 24, 2022, 01:11 AM - Edit history (2)

Only 5 of the 14 commissioners on CA's redistricting commission are Democrats---in a state where Republicans comprise less than 30% (23.9% as of June 2022) of the electorate. It is totally back asswards!

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
33. Only 23.9% of Californians are registered as Republicans.
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 01:03 AM
Nov 2022

Last edited Thu Nov 24, 2022, 04:39 AM - Edit history (1)

Dems are not getting more seats than they deserve in CA.

In red states, where Democrats often comprise 30-45% of the electorate, Democrats are routinely unrepresented in the state's House delegation. But when it is the reverse, and Dems are the state majority in blue states, Republicans are NOT shut out of the House delegation for the blue state. Republicans have ample representation in CA's House delegation.

Republicans gerrymander red states to shut out Dems from the House, but get no punishment or compensation against that in blue states. Seems like a win for Republicans to me.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
38. Registration is not the same as votes cast
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 12:58 PM
Nov 2022

Last edited Thu Nov 24, 2022, 02:05 PM - Edit history (2)

The math is simple and the numbers do not lie. We routinely win more than our share of seats in blue states (CA, IL, NJ, etc) and they do the same in red states. In the end at the national level, the number of each seats won by the two parties are representative of the votes cast.

You mention the CA Assembly, where we have 75% of the seats with 61% of the vote. That's an advantage of 14% which translates to 11 extra seats.


I'm all for ending gerrymandering and drawing political maps that accurately reflect the electorate. But blaming our loss in the House on anything other than voter turnout is a mistake and discourages voting.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
40. Republicans get more representatives in the House, per Republican voter, than Democratic voters get.
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 11:32 PM
Nov 2022

I wasn't talking about the state assembly, nor am I sure what you are referring to as "61% of the vote." I was talking about the US House of representatives, as is the OP. If you are referring to how Alex Padilla won his Senate seat on Nov. 8 with 61% of the vote, that is not indicative of the amount of "Democratic votes" in CA.
Padilla did not even campaign, nor did Newsom.

Neither CA nor NY have excess Democratic representation in our US House of Representatives delegations. Republicans now hold the House thanks to GOP gerrymandering. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/11/the-midterms-are-about-courts-rigging-the-outcome.html Everyone saw this coming. https://truthout.org/articles/experts-say-gop-house-takeover-wouldve-been-impossible-without-gerrymandering/ Earlier this year, Congress had a chance to pass landmark anti-gerrymandering reforms as part of Democrats’ omnibus democracy bill, the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, but the bill narrowly failed on the Senate floor because of the filibuster. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/road-not-taken-gerrymandering

If we ignore the much more vast and shameless gerrymandering Republicans engage in, we do so at our peril. Acknowledging that reality should encourage greater turnout to overcome that gerrymandering, not discourage it. Indeed, that's what happened with Katie Porter, who used to be in a solidly blue congressional district. I volunteered for her campaign as soon as I heard how screwed she got in redistricting after her home was drawn into a new, more Republican CA-47 in Orange Counry. I knocked on doors in the heat and helped get the vote out for her, and she won with 51.7% of the vote. Alex Padilla only got 49.48% of the vote in Orange County.

The mistakes we made with the "bipartisan" redistricting commissions in NY and CA need to be corrected. We can't put our heads in the sand. If we can't get gerrymandering banned nationwide, then we should not unilaterally disarm just in blue states. It gives us no bargaining chip in trying to convince Republicans to end gerrymandering. Right now, Republicans are by FAR the beneficiaries of gerrymandering. Both sides are NOT the same when it comes to gerrymandering.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
41. I'm not sure what you're talking about
Fri Nov 25, 2022, 12:01 AM
Nov 2022

California's House Delegation is overly representational of Democrats, that's a simple mathematical fact. Same goes for a number of blue states like NJ and IL.

You can call it gerrymandering or whatever else you'd like, but the math indicates it balances out Republican bias in red states. If it didn't, they would have gotten a lot more seats. As it is their 51% of the votes got them 51% of the seats.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
43. This is what I'm talking about:
Fri Nov 25, 2022, 01:41 AM
Nov 2022

This is the postmortem of the House results by Brookings following the 2016 election.



https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2017/02/22/misrepresentation-in-the-house/

As you can see, Republicans got 50.6% of the votes, but 55.4% of the seats. That is the "simple mathematical fact" I'm talking about.


I haven't seen a similar study for the 2022 election. Votes are still being counted in California so I imagine there won't be any definitive studies for a while. Where are you getting that "51% of the votes got them 51% of the seats" figures from?

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
46. California is still counting. Where'd you get your 2022 numbers?
Fri Nov 25, 2022, 03:14 PM
Nov 2022

If it's so easy to find, why don't you post the link? DUers post links to back up claims.

Sure, my link is from 2016, but Republicans haven't done away with the gerrymandering that led to those numbers. If anything, it's gotten worse.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
49. It hasn't gotten worse
Fri Nov 25, 2022, 03:35 PM
Nov 2022

And it's always swinging back and forth with one party getting and edge for a few elections at a time.

Gerrymandering is a problem, it leads to both parties being pushed away from most voters in the middle and discourages minority party participation. But it's not something Republicans dominate at and the numbers show that.

Continuing to push the narrative that we are being cheated also discourages participation which only makes the actual problem we are having, voter turnout, that much worse.

My data comes from the database I maintain based on sources from several public sources, generally election officials in each state.

Here is data from the past 40 years of House elections.

Democrat Republican
Year % Votes % Seats % Votes % Seats
2020 51.6% 51.0% 48.4% 49.0%
2018 54.4% 54.1% 45.6% 45.9%
2016 49.4% 44.6% 50.6% 55.4%
2014 47.1% 43.2% 52.9% 56.8%
2012 50.6% 46.2% 49.4% 53.8%
2010 46.5% 44.4% 53.5% 55.6%
2008 55.5% 59.1% 44.5% 40.9%
2006 54.1% 53.6% 45.9% 46.4%
2004 48.6% 46.5% 51.4% 53.5%
2002 47.5% 47.2% 52.5% 52.8%
2000 49.8% 49.0% 50.2% 51.0%
1998 49.4% 48.6% 50.6% 51.4%
1996 50.0% 47.8% 50.0% 52.2%
1994 46.5% 47.0% 53.5% 53.0%
1992 52.6% 59.4% 47.4% 40.6%
1990 54.1% 61.5% 45.9% 38.5%
1988 53.9% 59.8% 46.1% 40.2%
1986 55.0% 59.3% 45.0% 40.7%
1984 52.7% 58.3% 47.3% 41.7%
1982 56.1% 62.0% 43.9% 38.0%
1980 51.4% 55.9% 48.6% 44.1%

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
53. The complete numbers for 2022 are not out yet.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:24 AM
Nov 2022

Like I kept telling you, California is still counting votes.

That's why I knew you made up your 2022 "51% of the votes/51% of the seats" numbers for the House.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
54. It's not made up
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:57 AM
Nov 2022
https://www.cookpolitical.com/charts/house-charts/national-house-vote-tracker/2022

Unless California has more than 3 million votes left to count, the numbers are pretty spot on.

You don’t have to like the truth for it to still be true.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
69. Dec 8th
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 03:59 PM
Nov 2022

Is 12 days from now.

Maybe you should wait until all the votes are counted in all the counties of all the states before making proclamations of what the total vote count is. You didn't say you were projecting 51%/51%. You were asserting those were the votes, and they're not. At least not yet.

These votes trailing in are bluer and bluer. Ask Karen Bass.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
71. If all remaining CA votes
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 04:01 PM
Nov 2022

are blue, GOP will still have almost 51% of the vote. Facts are facts, whether you like them or not.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
75. I'm not talking about orojections
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 04:17 PM
Nov 2022

I’m talking about actual votes that have been counted…

Facts obviously aren’t your friend.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
76. A handful of votes in CA
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 04:48 PM
Nov 2022

Will not move national numbers at all. Every outstanding CA vote could be Blue and it still won't matter. We both know that. We both know the seats won track very closely with the votes cast.

I'm not the only one relying on these numbers. You can try to deny them all you'd like in some failed effort to not back down from the claims you've tried to make. But, we both know I'm correct.


SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
77. It's not a "handful." And you now admit you were stating a projection, not the actual vote total.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 04:54 PM
Nov 2022

Projections are not the same as actual votes. Ask Majority Leader McConnell...oh wait.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
80. That's an awful analogy
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 05:08 PM
Nov 2022

The vote for Speaker has not been held while over 100 million votes have been counted nation wide in House races.

Currently the Republicans are ahead ~54 Million to ~51 million.

As of 11/8/22, California had 253,134 potential uncounted ballots.

So yes, 253,134 out of 106 million votes (0002%) is a relative handful and not enough to move the numbers in any meaningful or significant way.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
83. That's just it
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 06:36 PM
Nov 2022

We can already see. We have moved past political opinions, hopes and dreams and have arrived firmly in the land of math and facts.

I've just showed you, mathematically, that there are not enough uncounted votes left to matter.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
86. No
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 06:46 PM
Nov 2022

It's quite clearly the math of the situation.

That said, why don't you show me just a single potential situation in which the uncounted ballots can change the numbers in a noticeable way.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
88. The numbers actually aren't my opiniom
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 06:47 PM
Nov 2022

I’ve provided you links to both the national vote count (actual, counted votes) and the number of votes left to count in California (less than 300,000).

If you choose to ignore facts, and cling to fantasies, that’s your prerogative.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
93. The Cook's link is not the final total. CA is not the only state with lots of outstanding votes.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:55 PM
Nov 2022

Last edited Sun Nov 27, 2022, 04:45 AM - Edit history (1)

Cooks does not say how many ballots are left to be counted in each state. NY looks like it only has about 90% of the vote counted.

For example, NY District 15, where Democrats are currently winning by 82.5%, only has 58% of expected votes counted. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/dwvkdgzdqpm/new-york/

Schumer got 3,201,923, and his opponent Pinion got 2,439,179 votes. That's 5,641,102 total votes counted. And that's with only 90% of expected votes counted. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/dwvkdgzdqpm/new-york/ That indicates there are still 626,789 votes to be counted in the Senate race, NY statewide. So there should be about that many votes to count (total) in the House races.

I imagine much of the West Coast states are still counting too. And God knows what's happening in Florida.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
98. Florida is already done
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 09:27 PM
Nov 2022

and has been for weeks.

And since we’re talking House races, then stick to House races. You can see that those are in the 80%-90% counted.

California has the most voters, and they only have ~250,000 votes left to count. I’d you truly believe that there are another 3 million votes out there still uncounted for House races, and that every one of those votes will fo to Democrats, then you’re simply unable to accept reality as it relates to this issue.

That’s your right, of course, but you shouldn’t expect anyone to take you seriously when you are unable or unwilling to accept numerical facts.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
105. You're the one who won't accept numerical facts. "80-90% counted" is not fully counted.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:41 PM
Nov 2022

Last edited Sun Nov 27, 2022, 04:47 AM - Edit history (1)

The final count is the full count, and 80-90% isn't it.

And it's not even CA with the most outstanding votes. According to Reuters' numbers, NY still has about 625,000 votes to be counted. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/dwvkdgzdqpm/new-york/

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
109. You'll have to do the math.
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 01:33 AM
Nov 2022

It gives the votes counted and the % of the total vote that has been counted. That's enough to figure out the total number of votes, and thus, the number of votes yet to be counted.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
116. Unless
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 07:57 AM
Nov 2022

You did that for all 27 House races, the. You really don’t know how many are left. And if you’re basing it on the Senate race then, you’re projecting numbers based on an incorrect premise.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
119. It's 26 House races in NY. And each of those House ballots had the Schumer race on it too.
Mon Nov 28, 2022, 04:58 AM
Nov 2022

It's a shortcut to just use the Schumer/Pinion numbers. It might be off by a few votes, where the ballot had a House Representative vote, but left the choice in the Schumer/Pinion race blank. If you want to do it for each of the 26 House races, knock yourself out. I'm not projecting numbers, I'm just calculating how many ballots are uncounted based on the numbers given by Reuters (total votes counted and % of ballots counted). How am I basing it on a "false premise"?

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
122. If you're that obsessed with this, add it up yourself.
Thu Dec 8, 2022, 06:52 PM
Dec 2022

As far as California goes, ballots continue to be counted today (today is supposed to be the last day of counting) so we still only have unofficial results. County elections officials must report final official results to the Secretary of State by December 9, 2022. The CA SOS website indicates there is "7 days left," and I'm not sure what that means. https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
126. I can wait for professionals with better access to data, like Brookings, to issue reports.
Fri Dec 9, 2022, 01:16 AM
Dec 2022

Brookings usually issues their analysis in late January, early February.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
127. Lol
Fri Dec 9, 2022, 11:03 AM
Dec 2022

Keep moving those goal posts.

The State Election Officials numbers are accurate. Unless you're an election denier type.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
63. California
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 02:01 PM
Nov 2022

Is done. There might be a few recounts of very close elections that might swing a few dozen votes one way or the other. But nothing that will move the needle.


Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
58. spot on
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 09:03 AM
Nov 2022

it shouldn't be this hard when party is full on, hateful, blatantly corrupt, immoral and relentlessly driving to push this country into an authoritarian chrisofacist idiocracy and the other party, while not perfect, simply wants good governance, a strong safety net, to protect our planet and to have all people treated with dignity and respect.

mainer

(12,018 posts)
30. Speaking with my upstate NY family, bail reform did it
Wed Nov 23, 2022, 06:39 PM
Nov 2022

They say the rising crime rates and the inability to lock up repeat offenders pissed them off so they went with the GOP. The crime button helped the GOP win.

I don’t know how accurate their statements about NY and bail reform are, I’m just telling you what I’m hearing. The mass shoplifting and no jail time is getting people mad.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
36. Bail reform didn't do it. 4 conservative NY judges screwed Democrats in NY.
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 05:27 AM
Nov 2022

Those 4 judges form the NY Court majority that ordered the district lines be redrawn by a special master, rather than letting the Democratic majority NY Legislature do it. The NY redistricting commission couldn't do it because it was deadlocked because, like in CA, the redistricting commission stupidly had the same amount of Republicans as Democrats, even though NY, like CA, has far more Democratic voters than Republican voters. https://www.npr.org/2022/04/27/1095100208/new-york-redistricting-rejected In CA, only 23.9% of voters are registered as Republicans, yet Republicans have the same amount of seats as Democrats on CA's redistricting commission. Why do blue states insist on giving Republicans more representation on these redistricting commissions than they deserve based on their percentage of registered voters?

That special master in NY basically set up lines that favored Republicans. And that's why Maloney lost in his redrawn district.


Elie Mystal warned us:





From Elie's article on this in The Nation (no paywall):

Republicans challenged the maps, and the New York court, by a vote of 4-3, decided to throw out the legislatively approved maps. But instead of telling the committee to do a better job and punting approval back to the legislature, the conservative judges took it upon themselves to appoint a “special master” to draw new maps and then forced the state to use them.

The consequence of letting conservative judges pick the districts, instead of a Democratic legislature, showed up on election night in New York. The Republicans are poised to pick up four new congressional seats, thanks to, among other things, a victory over Sean Patrick Maloney, the chairman of the DCCC (sorry, not sorry).
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/gerrymandering-republican-victories-midterms/

Cuomo put those 4 conservatives on the NY Court to show how bipartisan he was. What good did that do him or NY? Republicans continued to be obstructionist and partisan, because that is what they exist to be.

And don't fall for the GOP's crime talking points. Yes, crime is up from the unusually low numbers of 2020 when everything was shut down, but NYC is still safer than it was two decades ago. https://www.amny.com/news/crime-up-nyc-still-safer/

mainer

(12,018 posts)
37. Just repeating what my independent-voting relatives said
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 09:50 AM
Nov 2022

They live in upstate, not NYC which is almost like a different country. If they are saying this is the reason they voted for the GOP this year, they’re probably not the only ones. As Michael Moore would tell you, we have to hear what they’re saying in order to counter the narrative

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
89. In the NY House Elections:
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:01 PM
Nov 2022

Democrats beat Republicans 3,070,548 (55.14%) to 2,462,510 (44.22%).

NY has 26 House seats. 15 won by the Democrats, 11 by Republicans.

If truly representational maps were drawn, the result would have been 14 Democrats, 12 Republicans.
26 X 0.5514 = 14.33
26 X 0.4422 = 11.49

As you can see, we actually got a slight (~1/2 seat) advantage from the maps.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
91. What link are you getting those numbers from? Reuters still does not have complete NY vote totals.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:35 PM
Nov 2022

For example, NY District 15, where Democrats are currently winning by 82.5%, only has 58% of expected votes counted. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/dwvkdgzdqpm/new-york/

What they do report indicates Democrats got more than the 3,070,548 total House votes you are asserting. Schumer got 3,201,923, and that's with only 90% of expected votes counted.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
92. As I said, I get numbers from various sources to populate my database
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:52 PM
Nov 2022

First off, Shumer votes are not going to be the same as total House Dem votes or any other state wide Democratic candidate. People vote split ticket or fail to vote for some races, especially down ballot.

My sources have NY 15 at 95% in and Dems winning 82.6%. Which is a perfect illustration of the point I continue to try to get through to you. As you can clearly see, the % of the Democratic votes in NY15 failed to move significantly from 58% counted to 95% counted, only drifting slightly from 82.5% to 82.6%.

The vast majority of votes have been counted and the remaining uncounted votes are not enough to significantly change the breakdown of the two party split, even if the remaining uncounted votes are heavily biased towards one party. It's simple math at this point.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
94. LOL So you won't give me your "sources"?
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 08:01 PM
Nov 2022

And yes, NY 15 didn't move much in terms of the % the Dem was winning by, but those numbers left to come in are solidly (82.6%+) Democratic. Districts like that will change the House vote total.

Zeitghost

(3,850 posts)
97. I've already showed you
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 09:11 PM
Nov 2022

Last edited Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:22 PM - Edit history (1)

The math can not do what you claim. 95%+ of the votes are in and there is not enough left to move the needle.

And as I said, my numbers come from a multitude of public sources. If they are wrong, it would be easy for you to show and yet you don't. Because as I said, we both know I'm correct.

You're bordering on election denial. It's not a good look.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
104. You haven't shown anything.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:22 PM
Nov 2022

You won't reveal your "sources." That's not a good look on DU. And you can't, because we have no final numbers.

I'm not denying election results, I'm denying your assertions of what the total Dem numbers are, because that has not been determined yet. That's a fact. Many states are still counting ballots, including CA and NY with hundreds of thousands of outstanding ballots each, and the vast majority of those outstanding ballots appear to be Democratic votes, as shown in the Reuters link I gave you.

So the assertion that Republicans got exactly "51% of the votes and 51% of the seats" in the House is premature, at best.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
118. Schumer's race is a statewide race. It's a shortcut to adding up all the NY House races.
Mon Nov 28, 2022, 03:21 AM
Nov 2022

Last edited Mon Nov 28, 2022, 05:06 AM - Edit history (1)

Everyone who voted for a House candidate also had Schumer's Senate race on the ballot. So an uncounted Schumer/Pinion ballot should also be an uncounted House ballots. Some people may have left the choice for the Schumer/Pinion race blank, so the uncounted House ballot number you get this way may be off by a few ballots (i.e., there may be more uncounted House ballots than the Schumer numbers indicate).

Or, if you want to be absolutely exact, you can do the math on each of the 26 House races, and add those 26 uncounted ballot numbers all up, and you should get pretty much the same number as the Schumer shortcut.

orleans

(34,042 posts)
102. illinois dems did a bit of gerrymandering of their own
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:07 PM
Nov 2022


video at link:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/videos/illinois-may-be-the-worst-democratic-gerrymander-in-the-country/


Illinois’s aggressive gerrymander is a big part of the reason Democrats have gained seats from redistricting nationwide this year. But it could also backfire. In order to draw so many blue seats, Democrats had to spread their voters thin, leaving some districts with only a small Democratic lean. If Republicans have a strong 2022 election, they could end up winning not only their three safely red seats but also those light-blue seats. This gerrymander could end up being the biggest blunder in Illinois since Mrs. O’Leary’s cow knocked over that lantern.

To be sure, this map will most likely help Democrats in their quest to hold onto the House. But it’s also possible that they’ve bitten off more than they can chew.



on edit: article & video from may 2022

Tribetime

(4,684 posts)
103. I agree 100% and I think in 2024 even with the deck
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:16 PM
Nov 2022

Stacked against us we will crush the Rs. and hopefully start winning back state seats and end them once and for all

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
113. I think you're right. It will be a presidential election year, when there's greater Dem turnout.
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 03:18 AM
Nov 2022

We almost kept the House this year as it was. I know I'll be doing everything I can to help make that happen. Women need their bodily autonomy back.

Old Crank

(3,532 posts)
120. I lived in CA
Mon Nov 28, 2022, 05:29 AM
Nov 2022

When the independent commission was set up.

It was a respinse to the way things were run in CA. For the state elections for state house and senate both parties had an agreement. The Dems got to have 1 seat shy of 2/3. The GOP got the rest. That way the budget needed at least one GOP vote in each house to pass. CA would operated for over a month until one unfortunate GOP member would sacrifice himself and vote for the budget. It was a mess.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California and New York