Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,069 posts)
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 10:03 AM Nov 2022

"But for" rule...

In regards to the criticisms of Liz Cheney and the work of the J6 Committee, it should be asked would any of the alleged crimes have been committed "but for" the actions and words of Donald Trump?

Was it wrong to put too much focus on Donald Trump?
==========

but for rule

n. one of several tests to determine if a defendant is responsible for a particular happening. In this test, was there any other cause, or would it have occurred "but for" the defendant's actions? Example: "But for" defendant Drivewild's speeding, the car would not have gone out of control, and therefore the defendant is responsible. This is shorthand for whether the action was the "proximate cause" of the damage.

https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=113

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"But for" rule... (Original Post) kentuck Nov 2022 OP
I thought the same thing about Ashli Babbitt. When her mom spoke up. But for Donald Trump Walleye Nov 2022 #1

Walleye

(30,996 posts)
1. I thought the same thing about Ashli Babbitt. When her mom spoke up. But for Donald Trump
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 10:18 AM
Nov 2022

Donald Trump not conceding the presidency like an American is supposed to

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"But for" rule...