General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (WarGamer) on Fri Dec 2, 2022, 11:16 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
spooky3
(38,624 posts)Were worth at peak.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)Comparing peak 2021 levels to today is entertaining.
Shopify... SHOP went from 169 to 40...
Upstart... UPST from 390 to 19
Affirm... AFRM from 164 to 14
TSLA is holding up well... compared to other big tech names.
spooky3
(38,624 posts)Using your logic, if you think a 7.x% gain is large, how many more billions does that 50+% drop represent?
Response to spooky3 (Reply #11)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
spooky3
(38,624 posts)Do you see how 50% is a lot more than 7-8%?
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)Broadly the market is only down 10-20%...
But look at commonly held tickers, especially tech
spooky3
(38,624 posts)WarGamer
(18,606 posts)10-20% down.
Seriously you want me to go ticker by ticker and show how far down?
Some of the biggest names have been crushed.
spooky3
(38,624 posts)WarGamer
(18,606 posts)Bottom line. Most of the market has been crushed.
And the list of big names in tech down 50% is long.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,876 posts)that your title line is misleading.
He didn't MAKE $2 billion today, his net worth increased by that only because the share price of Tesla increased. He could LOSE $4 billion tomorrow if the trend reverses.
If you trade regularly then you should know the difference between realized and unrealized gains.
He didn't make $2 billion any more than I did by buying a lottery ticket. You don't "make" fuck all till you sell.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)BTW, full time daily trader is a carefully selected phrase... because I'm not a day trader, which has a specific meaning. But I DO trade daily.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)he'd have lost a shit-ton before the trading was done - were it even possible (or legal, without notice).
onenote
(46,136 posts)The day before Thanksgiving 2021, the Dow closed at 35183. it closed today at 34429. That's a drop of around 2 percent -- hardly a lot.
Moreover, one year ago the Dow was less than 1 percent higher than it is today.
If you look at the market at its highest over the past year -- in January 2022 -- it was 6.4 percent higher than today. A sizable difference by not exactly "crushed".
And don't forget that the market tanked two months ago, when it bottomed out at around 29,200. But since then it has recovered and is 18 percent higher than it was just two months ago (and, as noted less than 1 percent behind where it was a year ago).
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)And earlier I showed how LOTS Of big names are down 50%+ in 12 months
And don't forget... the market has rallied HARD the last few weeks
onenote
(46,136 posts)But it's not.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)Yes it's improved the last couple months.
But this year... the market has been down a lot.
I think you're splitting hairs.
edhopper
(37,359 posts)An Auto manufacturer, not a tech company.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)edhopper
(37,359 posts)Which it can only do by selling a lot more cars, it will do that.
At some point, the bears, who are dating it on their actual Financials, will be right.
Unless you see Tesla selling 10 million cars in 5 years?
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)It's completely overvalued.
But I won't touch puts with a 10' pole.
TSLA on track to sell 1.3M this year IIRC so in 5 years? 10 million??? Maybe close.
edhopper
(37,359 posts)Every other car company in the EV market, some with better cars.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)It's not modern...
But my wife wore out her Prius at nearly 300k miles (Pharma Rep) and we were shopping EV's... and today, nothing compares for the money.
A $48k-55k Model 3 is still head and shoulders above anything else PLUS each and EVERY EV out there not named Tesla has outrageous dealer mark ups.
Even a Bolt EUV is going for like 35k nowadays after the dealer jacks it up. And that's a golf cart compared to the Tesla.
The Big Three are years behind Tesla. The F150 EV can't tow... according to a online Auto Mag...
And NOTHING charges like a Supercharger. 200 miles in 15 minutes.
I will admit though... the Porsche Taycan and Mercedes EQS are really nice...
edhopper
(37,359 posts)Doesn't like them much anymore.
Picks cars like the Ford Mach higher.
Celerity
(54,366 posts)We have a 2019 Cayenne E-Hybrid (non Turbo) atm







WarGamer
(18,606 posts)48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)A Loon fan.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)pimpbot
(1,171 posts)I own two currently, and in the last year the service has gone to crap. Really believed in the company at first but between crack pot Elon and the dismal service I've given up. I'll keep these until something major happens and look elsewhere for my next vehicle. Plenty of competition ramping up.
Two terrible service examples:
1. Chip in windshield turned into a large crack. Had Tesla replace windshield. Service got black adhesive all over my interior, didn't seal the windshield properly, and scratched the hood. Had them redo and clean everything (5 days in shop). Still found issues and had them address while I sat there watching. Ironically a lady pulled in while I was chewing out the manager who had similar issues (found grease all over her dashboard). I've never had a problem with Safelite and will use them if it ever happens again.
2. Original Model S vehicles have had their supercharging software limited because of high rate of warranty replacements. It now takes over an hour to get 50% charge. Battery capacity is still within 10% of new, but Tesla decided no more fast charging for me. So instead of admitting the old style battery wasn't likely to make it through the 8 year warranty, they crippled the charging, on a 100k car. Makes me wonder what they'll do with 3s if/when they start seeing a lot of battery warranty claims.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)We ended up putting ourselves on the waitlist for the new 2023 Prius Prime.
Should be near 60mpg and it's super practical for my wife who drives 40k+ miles a year.
Love Toyotas. Bulletproof.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)PHEV=Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle
We got 56 mpg running in hybrid mode on a long trip with steep terrain, but we rarely buy gas. The battery is larger than a standard hybrid, and there's a charging port. Takes 4 hours for a full Level 2 charge at home, 42 mile range. We use it 90+% in electric mode. No charge? Runs as hybrid. We ignored gas prices this year.
Lithium's a conflict mineral. Musk crowed about the coup in Bolivia, which was about access to lithium deposits. I want to minimize lithium use, but hydrogen fuel cells aren't happening-yet. So I compromise with smaller batteries and occasional gasoline use.
I like Subaru a lot for reliability, durability, and bad weather, but their PHEV only gets 17 miles per charge.
Looking forward to the Aptera Solar Electric Vehicle due out soon: Aerodynamic low mass 2-seater with large cargo space, solar cells built in, standard charging port. Their online calculator estimated we would need 4 charges per year. Charge from the sun while you park or drive. Wheel hub motors like the Rivian truck, so low maintenance and few moving parts. Cheapest builds are under 30k. We should expect SEVs to take off soon.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)Car sales were based on the federal tax credit, and Tesla made a fortune selling emissions credits to companies building polluting cars.
edhopper
(37,359 posts)When Tesla starts trading like Car company instead of a Tech company at 1600X earnings?
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)spooky3
(38,624 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)WarGamer
(18,606 posts)You and I have discussed this before.
Shermann
(9,059 posts)Setting a threshold doesn't make it just the other guy's problem because now everybody has to demonstrate that they don't have the 10 million.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)That means that Musk could literally never pay tax again.
He can just take out loans for his living expenses, live in a Tesla housing facility, drive company cars, fly company jets... have a company Platinum Card (or Black Card)
I fundamentally disagree with the idea that one person should be able to hoard billions or hundreds of billions of dollars and pay NOTHING.
EVER.
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)Are taxable. The Trump org is finding this out the hard way.
And when those loans come due and must be paid, the income used to pay them off is taxed.
You can't hoard untaxed dollars.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)Talk about hoarding wealth...
This tells the WHOLE story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Wealth_Inequality_-_v2.png

BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)I thought he bought all shares and took Tesla private. If so, why is it being publicly traded? Traded to whom?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)you win some, you lose some.
It's all unrealized unless he sells it.
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)Someone worth $200B can pay ZERO taxes for decades.
Literally ZERO.
Take out loans for living expenses. Live on Tesla premises, drive Tesla cars, fly Tesla jets... etc etc...
The only reason Musk pays ANY taxes is because he has to exercise his stock options and pay the tax.
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)Quite frankly, I highly doubt it ever will.
Worth $200B at current valuations, but pay zero in income tax.
There's the rub.
My mother and father bought a house in 1996. A decade later it was worth a good $140k more. Then 2009. It reset to its 1996 value.
My mother wanted to know who stole her money. She had $300k in 2007, in late 2009 she had $160k. Somebody robbed her, clearly, and she called the police. They laughed. She called me. I tried to explain. Repeatedly. Over weeks.
In 2010 I realized the problem. My father killed himself in March of that year. I went as executor and my mother was a bit off. Calming her down when she came at me with a knife was the give-away. Checked medicine bottles, called doctor, said what happened, told the nice nurse that she came at me with a knife because I was evil and wanted to steal her house now that the bad man that was dead in the garage was dead (her husband of 50+ years), that she commuted from Arizona to Maryland every day for decades back in the '50s and '60s for her 8-hour shifts and that people were living in the AC vents, was 75 but born in and always had lived in the house built in 1996 and the nice doctor I was transferred to told me she had moderate-several fronto-temporal dementia and was delusional. And the doctor was very, very worried now that she was living alone, delusional.
So of course she didn't understand that an increase in valuation =/= taxable income.
Now, had my parents paid taxes on the $160 "earned income" from their house's appreciation, who'd have reimbursed them when the housing prices fell? The state and federal governments? Hell, my parents paid taxes on the "appraised value" for a few years when, you know, the state overbilled them on taxes because, in the end, the house wasn't worth $300k. That was a state-codified injustice.
Let's compound it by making it a federal injustice.
Federal and state law ignored the assets my mother and father had, as working class Boomers with a retirement fund, because they weren't taxed on "income" from unsold appeciated assets. A good thing. My mother and father both lost more than the average median income in 2009 from stock/bond problems. They never enjoyed the income until they sold the assets (upon which they were taxed). Nobody wants to argue that had they been taxed on appreciated value they should have been refunded that they should be reimbursed by state/fed government. (And, again, my mother was irate that somebody stole her money when her whatever-fund lost value--AIG went bust? Somebody stole the money. But, I explained, not AIG. AIG didn't sell her the stock, somebody else did--that person got her money, then it increased in value, then went bust. She earned no money from the increase, lost no money from the decrease. Just paper assets. Non-taxable, and justly, rightly, properly, so. Tax it? You're in junust, wrong, improper territory. Until it's money, it's not legal tender.)
former9thward
(33,424 posts)He paid $15 billion in taxes last year which was the highest payment by anyone in U.S. history.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/07/elon-musk-faces-a-15-billion-tax-bill-which-is-likely-the-real-reason-hes-selling-stock.html
WarGamer
(18,606 posts)It's theoretically possible for someone to be worth 100B and pay ZERO taxes on a year to year basis.
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)You can't tax theoretical wealth. Way too many problems.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)The OP thinks he would be owed a refund from the IRS had he been force to pay taxes on wealth that never existed.
acerlily
(2 posts)He is good at making money because he is working for his dreams. We can also make money, not quickly but for sure.
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,760 posts)https://read.cash/@acerlily
https://hackyourgut.com/participant/acerlily11/
https://solo.to/acerlily11
Eliot Rosewater
(34,285 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(69,760 posts)Name: Lily Acer
Gender: Female
Hometown: NewYork
Home country: United States
Current location: New York
Member since: Thu Dec 1, 2022, 04:36 AM
Number of posts: 1
About Me
I am an explorer. By profession a former banking professional. Currently working as a financial advisor and a writer for a company. I have a great interest in finance.
Carlitos Brigante
(26,848 posts)daddy to love him and impressing people who are "cooler" than him. Which is pretty much everyone but his army of Stans. What am I missing here?
ProfessorGAC
(76,673 posts)It's easy to set a threshold such that it doesn't impact modest wealth folks, and retirement accounts are already protected.
I think I'd propose a higher number than you, though. Perhaps as high as 5%.
Johnny2X2X
(24,187 posts)You can tax these unrealized gains somehow, maybe by looking at how the gains are being leveraged.
We have creative accountants working for the government that know exactly how taxes are avoided, and they can figure out an appropriate way to levy taxes on the top .1%.
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)Allow them to write off unrealized losses?