General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOcelot II
(128,605 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Ocelot II
(128,605 posts)Without the Constitution his sorry orange ass would have been in prison a long time ago. But even with the Constitution working as it should, I do believe that day will come.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)And I agree that a reckoning is coming.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)It's not a long document, so it should be easy to find.
Simpler yet, which part of the Constitution even suggests freedom pending appeal?
Ocelot II
(128,605 posts)but many of SCOTUS' criminal procedure decisions have at least implicitly recognized that right. Also, the criminal procedural system relies on appellate remedies as part of fundamental due process. Whether a person can remain free under conditions pending appeal depends on the rules of the particular court where they were sentenced. You could argue that since an appellate court could overturn the defendant's conviction, he could be considered as at least possibly innocent and therefore entitled to supervised freedom unless/until there is a final determination that he is guilty.
But all this is way above my pay grade. I'm just engaging in legal woolgathering.
tritsofme
(19,753 posts)jls4561
(2,805 posts)Response to malaise (Original post)
marble falls This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tell your friend that Bannon will go to prison when: hell freezes over, the pope shits in the woods, and a bear becomes a catholic.
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)lees1975
(6,869 posts)In our America, criminals go to jail. In the other America, those with money do as they please.
onenote
(45,924 posts)appeal.
In cases that don't involve a violent crime and with a sentence that is shorter than the time it would take for an appeal to be decided, it is pretty common to delay incarceration until after the appeal is resolved.
Bannon was sentenced to four months for a non-violent crime. Pretty standard practice to delay incarceration.