Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,094 posts)
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 06:37 PM Dec 2022

"I'm the Governor of N. Carolina. This Fringe Claim Before the Supreme Court Would Upend Democracy."

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/opinion/supreme-court-elections-vote.html

No paywall
https://archive.ph/WjIlc

Over the past six months, the United States Supreme Court has handed down one misguided ruling after another, stripping Americans of the constitutional right to an abortion, curtailing the regulation of guns and industrial emissions, and muddying the divide between church and state. The people have protested. They’ve organized. And in 2022, they voted.

In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the June decision on abortion, the majority wrote that “women are not without electoral or political power.” That’s one thing they got right, and Republicans found that out the hard way in the November midterm elections that they expected to win big. Now, however, the very ability to exercise electoral and political power at the ballot box is hanging in the balance in a case the court is scheduled to hear on Wednesday.

Moore v. Harper is a case from North Carolina that state and national Republicans are using to push an extreme legal premise known as the independent state legislature theory. While the United States Constitution delegates the authority to administer federal elections to the states, with Congress able to supersede those state decisions, proponents of this theory argue that state legislatures are vested with the exclusive power to run those elections. This view would leave no room for oversight by state courts and put the ability of governors to veto election-related legislation in doubt.

The court’s decision on this alarming argument could fundamentally reshape American democracy. Four justices have suggested that they are sympathetic to the theory. If the court endorses this doctrine, it would give state legislatures sole power over voting laws, congressional redistricting and potentially even the selection of presidential electors and the proper certification of election winners.

*snip*
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I'm the Governor of N. Carolina. This Fringe Claim Before the Supreme Court Would Upend Democracy." (Original Post) Nevilledog Dec 2022 OP
We do not live in the Confederated States of America. raging moderate Dec 2022 #1
Later in the article underpants Dec 2022 #2
Every time I see news of this.. Cha Dec 2022 #3

underpants

(182,788 posts)
2. Later in the article
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 06:45 PM
Dec 2022

Republicans in the legislature have also gerrymandered districts in diabolical ways. In 2016, state Republicans drew a congressional redistricting map that favored Republicans 10 to 3. They did so, the Republican chairman of a legislative redistricting committee explained, “because I do not believe it’s possible to draw a map with 11 Republicans and two Democrats.”

Cha

(297,190 posts)
3. Every time I see news of this..
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 07:13 PM
Dec 2022

my heart sinks and I get a little traumatized.

Someone asked on another thread about this maybe last week.. "Why is the SC ever taking this case?"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"I'm the Governor of N. C...