General Discussion

jcgoldie

(12,046 posts) Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:12 PM Dec 2022

WI Sen Ron Johnson is watching tonights results in GA with bated breath...

...To see if he retains his title as the stupidest motherfucker in the United States Senate.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WI Sen Ron Johnson is watching tonights results in GA with bated breath... (Original Post) jcgoldie Dec 2022 OP

Wow, you're generous. I think he's got a LOT of spooky3 Dec 2022 #1

Tuberville, Blackburn. Funtatlaguy Dec 2022 #3

Absolutely. Nt spooky3 Dec 2022 #4

I disagree. Ron Johnson is not stupid. LakeArenal Dec 2022 #2

Yeah, Walker would be a sock puppet. Johnson is a schemer TBS...nt Wounded Bear Dec 2022 #5

Hah! - although the competition for it is overbooked. UTUSN Dec 2022 #6

Tuberville is way dumber. Johnson is 33taw Dec 2022 #7

spooky3

(38,744 posts)

1. Wow, you're generous. I think he's got a LOT of

Reply to jcgoldie (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:13 PM

Dec 2022

Competition, such as Hawley, Cotton, Foghorn Leghorn, etc.

Funtatlaguy

(11,884 posts)

3. Tuberville, Blackburn.

Reply to spooky3 (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:29 PM

Dec 2022

spooky3

(38,744 posts)

4. Absolutely. Nt

Reply to Funtatlaguy (Reply #3)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:39 PM

Dec 2022

LakeArenal

(29,949 posts)

2. I disagree. Ron Johnson is not stupid.

Reply to jcgoldie (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:14 PM

Dec 2022

He’s a consummate manipulator and liar.

He’s way more dangerous than Walker.

Wounded Bear

(64,459 posts)

5. Yeah, Walker would be a sock puppet. Johnson is a schemer TBS...nt

Reply to LakeArenal (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:41 PM

Dec 2022

UTUSN

(77,795 posts)

6. Hah! - although the competition for it is overbooked.

Reply to jcgoldie (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:42 PM

Dec 2022

33taw

(3,352 posts)

7. Tuberville is way dumber. Johnson is

Reply to jcgoldie (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:54 PM

Dec 2022

playing to the lowest in his party. Tuberville is just plain dumb.

Reply to this discussion