No, limiting the Hunter Biden laptop story didn't cost Trump the election
Musk and the GOP assholes are pushing some bizarre claim about Hunter Biden that makes no sense to sane people
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/12/05/trump-2020-election-hunter-biden-laptop/?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social
One of the indefensible assertions thats reemerged in recent days is that social media companies efforts to limit sharing of a New York Post story in October 2020 cost Donald Trump that years presidential election.
This is a long-standing claim, made newly salient with new Twitter owner Elon Musks release last week of internal documents about the decision to impose that limit. His intent was to suggest that pre-him Twitter was a place where conservative arguments were unfairly censored. But others, like former president Donald Trump, have gone further, suggesting that this action alone led to Joe Bidens 2020 victory.
Theres no reason to believe this is true......
In other words, in polling terms, there was no statistical difference in how people might have changed their vote after learning jobs numbers versus the claims about Biden and China. Were those jobs numbers muffled by Twitter? Instead of thinking this poll shows how the Hunter Biden story could have changed the election, its safer to view it as simply measuring how likely people are to say they would have changed their minds for nearly any reason.
All of this is beside the point of this debate. The point of the debate is, instead, to cast elites in the media and technology as inherently oppositional to Republican candidates, meaning, in 2020, Trump. This is a visceral argument, not a rational one, so pointing out that theres no evidentiary basis for the claim is fighting the wrong fight.