General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMark Meadows' phone is everything Republicans wish Hunter Biden's laptop was

Tickle
(4,131 posts)I have not
dutch777
(5,068 posts)And if Hunter did something illegal, by all means prosecute.
exboyfil
(18,359 posts)given the laptop was in the possession of a known adversarial third party.
Does any prosecutor want Rudy G. on the witness stand? Does he want to subject himself to awkward questions in which he will have to invoke the 5th amendment.
kwijybo
(268 posts)A laptop was given to a legally blind person by someone identifying themselves as "Hunter Biden". The computer repair person can't identify who it was that brought the computers, and didn't bother to get any contact information.
When the computer repair person started repairing the computer (it had water damage and the hard drive needed replacing), he turned on the computer, and used it to copy the faulty hard drive to another one, a file at a time. I've never done repairs for a living, but I've done them for myself, family, and friends: the part in italics makes me cringe! (All of the forensic evidence on the original is altered by that, and the copy is suspect at best at this point)
Then, the 'copy' he made for himself, was passed on to Rudy, and then 'copies' were passed on to other RWNJ personalities, who made comments based on, theoretically, what they 'found' on the hard drive.
Is it any wonder that HB's lawyers are looking at defamation lawsuits?
OverBurn
(1,292 posts)go to the trouble of recovering a laptop that wasn't brought in with info on whom to return it to. That's a lot of unneeded hassle, recovering stuff costs time and money, you'd get a name and phone number.
Typically I'd just installed a new hard drive, put a fresh operating system and a few free useful programs and ship it down the road. You just don't waste time on a junk laptop with no instructions to do so and a real contact.
If it really was Hunter's laptop, why would he drop it off to be fixed with no contact info?
Even if he did and it is his laptop, it's either incriminating or not. It's been years and not one juicy bit of info has been released. Talk about working slow, this puts a new meaning to slow.
The entire thing is just too weird to believe.
And why would the repair guy accept it without double checking the contact info, for that very reason?
And nothing appears to be "too weird to believe", where the MAGAts are concerned. Remember, these are the same people that believe that the COVID vaccine has tagging microchips that get injected into us along with the vaccine.
I usually get dying ones with "And save all the pictures and stuff on it!". Ask about backups, and you get, "what are backups". I end up using ddrescue or the like to clone the disk, fixing the sectors that can be fixed. Doesn't require me to be there to copy the next file, for certain.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)At least that is what they have admitted to.
For all we know, they may have had it on the internet as well and it could have been hacked before, hacked during, and hacked afterward.
OAITW r.2.0
(32,145 posts)Would anything on it be admissible as evidence, given the chain of custody and provenance of the acquisition?
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)IANAL, but I don't understand how anything on there could be admissible in court. There is no chain of custody whatsoever.
azureblue
(2,728 posts)is that someone put files on it - after the so called "discovery" date. Some IT10T Didn't know that files are encoded with the creation date. And this means the drive has been tampered with, not to mention the laptop has been through several hands and the guy who claims to be the repair man, has been selling clones of the drive..
It's worse than a nothing burger, because it will be easy to trace back who put files on the drive, after the fact, and how modified files that were already on it. When the GOP figures this one out, suddenly, the whole thing will quietly fade away.. .
OverBurn
(1,292 posts)any file. eXpress TimeStamp Toucher, google it if you want it. It's useful at times. When you move files from one partition to another it can change that info, sometimes you don't want it to, especially some pictures. Every photo taken has some extra info embedded in it, but these can be changed also with simple little free programs.
I'm not sure files have any more hidden info in them. Maybe Forensic PC specialists could get more info? Anyway they could probably easily tell if it's been messed with.
They even have professional grade Forensic PC software out there for free.
Danascot
(5,232 posts)and harassing multiple "witnesses" by making them testify.
Kingofalldems
(40,279 posts)Response to Tickle (Reply #1)
onecaliberal This message was self-deleted by its author.
IronLionZion
(51,269 posts)mzmolly
(52,793 posts)He's a private citizen and always has been.
louis-t
(24,618 posts)Supposedly, the FBI has the actual laptop and el stubido at the repair shop made copies, and there are copies of copies, and a lot of them had stuff added. Yeah, that'll hold up in court. All they have to do is make the plaintiffs bring in every known copy of the hard drive.
mucifer
(25,667 posts)I am not optimistic .But, hoping to be surprised.
gab13by13
(32,324 posts)Jack Smith needs to go after Meadows hard, indict him, don't give him immunity, he appears the type to flip on Trump.
azureblue
(2,728 posts)will drown out the Laptop story. If the GOP tries to amp up their pile of lies, they will be seen as pathetic, in the face of the facts from Meadows' phone. Which has already, within 24 hours exposed 34 GOPers as trying to overthrow the government.. And that is just the start
vapor2
(4,512 posts)for voting in 2 states, right?
brush
(61,033 posts)to cheat Hillary and the nation out of her presidency, and grant us WITH THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER.
Only Meadow's texts are new and highly incriminating evidence against him and other republican coup attempters, and not already examined, retread bullshit that was soon dismissedbut not before the damage was done, from which the nation still has a long way recover from, if ever.
Woohoo. I can almost hear indictments being drawn up already and prison door hinges being oiled up for new occupants.
Takket
(23,715 posts)The Meadows text I hate to say, the ones weve seen, didnt seem criminal themselves. But could be part of a larger plan. Like Jim Jordan spouting bullshit legal interpretations about the founding fathers might be a horrible take but it isnt illegal to say it.
Nor is planning to object to electors because again while the reasoning for it is bullshit Congress-members do have the legal right to object.
What Im looking for is the we need to get the crowd to riot to stop the count messages.
gab13by13
(32,324 posts)People signed their names to a piece of paper claiming to be electors for Donald Trump. That is not objecting to electors, that is falsifying to be the real electors.
Takket
(23,715 posts)I agree the fake electors should be charged with fraud but that is separate from the texts. What I mean is the texts ALONE arent enough to charge someone like Jim Jordan for sedition. But if there is other evidence out there he was recruiting oath keepers to get violent, then his texts here could be additional evidence as to his intent.
rubbersole
(11,223 posts)Impeachment followed. The J6 report with interview transcripts is going to be America's Christmas present.
KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)and dismissed it as bullshit.
Ford_Prefect
(8,613 posts)neither was convincing nor untainted.
FYI there is only supposition that any laptop of Hunters was ever in the hands of the shop. The so-called copy has so many suspicious flaws as to be worthless. The people who made the "duplicate" hard drive public claimed it was an accurate copy but forensic exams have found evidence that it could not be.
The timing and the chain of evidence both beg the question of its provenance. Several sources have pointed out that it resembles the kind of disinformation Putin's Trolls excel at.
IcyPeas
(25,475 posts)accidentally handed over
republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)gave President TFG's son-in-law.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)and I found incriminating evidence on a customer's laptop, I'm sure the first person I would call is Rudy Giulliani, then hand it over to him.
usonian
(25,326 posts)but decency prevents me from showing pictures of minors.
You have seen them.
argyl
(3,064 posts)Like Hunter's laptop, of which basically nothing has been shown to be harmful to our government.and for the first time in over 40 years of government service Hunter's Dad is not even in government.
And The Dotard pays no attention to the fact that his daughter and son in law were denied clearance to the jobs he wanted for them and got their access, legal or not.
And in the meantime the laptop belonging to a man whose father is out of government for the first time in decades may, or may not, have maybe a few shots of soft core porn. If it has even that much on it it hasn't been proven.
Meanwhile, Jared and Ivanka, of all the people undeserving of access to top secrets, get their clearance through daddy's arm twisting, possible blackmail, you name it. But that's important; anything for furtherance of ill gotten knowledge at best, or more likely, outright treason, to be used for blackmail or, worse yet, to be sold to enemies of the state for profit, all they give a damn about.
And Hunter's pix are probably more along the lines of dull hetero nude pix. If they exist. Which they don't.
I just used a phony story to show how foolish this laptop BS is in comparison to the real crimes The Dotard, Ivanka, and Jerod had a hand in. Donny Jr. and Eric no doubt tried their hands at a little espionage but were so lousy at it they were told to knock it off.
chriscan64
(1,789 posts)We may have heard tidbits of what is on the laptop, but the main point is that it could have something on it. Like Hillary's emails, the fact that there is unknown data to them is proof that something is being hidden, therefore: guilty. This whole thing does not even have the rigor of "if she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood..."