General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnd just like that - the journalists are unsuspended from Twitter.
Musk announced that the people have spoken, and all those suspended for tweeting his exact location (even though none of them actually did that) are now unsuspended.
He lost two polls in a row the second, a 24-hour poll pitting unsuspend NOW against unsuspend in 7 days. (58.7 to 41.3)
Salviati
(6,059 posts)The fact that he did this at all means that journalists shouldn't be crying to be let back on to twitter, they should be leaving it en masse.
Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)But at least one is already back (in less than an hour after being unsuspended).
At a minimum, I'd figure out how to capture all of my content from the site - since you know it's only time until he throws a hissy fit again.
dalton99a
(95,269 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)My guess is he didn't expect the poll results . . . but he'd boxed himself in by narrowing the options to two. Doing the math on the first poll, 7 days should have won and I'm sure he was counting on it.
Blue Owl
(59,626 posts)Real journalists dont need to use cheap shit like Twitter.
Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)and leave twitter without any substantive content.
I certainly wouldn't trust him not to ban on a whim again, in the near future.
PortTack
(35,824 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)back. Hopefully he will rethink what should and what should not be allowed
RockRaven
(19,754 posts)Not all. But some will.
Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)Off to other locations. Many established new homes immediately - but will they stick to them more that the does in their old home is say least temporarily unlocked?
But you're right, if course. Actions like the journalist ban have a chilling effect on important speech.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,599 posts)Musk is still running with the bullshit claim that Mastodon is "potentially harmful". He's just pissed off that there's a significant move to Mastodon because of his antics, and, with no concern for "free speech", he wants to use his market power to hurt a smaller rival.
Walleye
(45,436 posts)tanyev
(49,682 posts)Arazi
(8,887 posts)Multiple media appearances by the banned journalists and accelerating erosion of trust in the site with this move
Trenzalore
(2,575 posts)A few more of these temper tantrums and the board there might make a move. He doesn't own more than 50% of Tesla stock.
Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)It was reversed, than why. The ban was permanent, initially. Then very quickly turned into a 7-day ban, which he expected to be supported by his airing fans on Twitter, and then vanished when Twitter votes against him.
Yes, there were lots of other things going on - but many of them have been going on since he took over.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)NickB79
(20,405 posts)They have laws that protect journalists.
Elon got his hand slapped good
lees1975
(7,190 posts)what Elon Musk does. So what, who gives a damn?
Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)This was a bit different, as the world-wife response should indicate.
Twitter had become one off the main ways for journalists to quickly disseminate minute by minute accounts of gay breaking news. So banning journalists is a big deal, in a way that a lot of his other antics haven't been.
Wounded Bear
(64,637 posts)Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)that they will be banned at his majestys pleasure.
EleanorR
(2,441 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.