General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNewsweek - Kari Lake Wraps Up Trial With No Clear Evidence to Overturn Election
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/kari-lake-wraps-up-trial-with-no-clear-evidence-to-overturn-election/ar-AA15AcwQKari Lake Wraps Up Trial With No Clear Evidence to Overturn Election
Story by Katherine Fung 37m ago Dec 22
Lake, who was among the most prominent voices promoting former President Donald Trump's election fraud claims, spent two days making the case that she was the rightful winner of November's election. She lost to Democrat Katie Hobbs by more than 17,000 votes but asked a Maricopa County Superior Court judge to declare her Arizona's next governor or order a revote in the state's most populous county.
Snip
Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek that Lake's lawsuit is so "frivolous on its face," he's surprised Thompson didn't dismiss it entirely.
Snip
Rahmani said aside from the fact that Lake didn't present any evidence proving intentional printer interference or evidence that ballot chain of custody was violated, "Mere conclusionary allegations aren't enough."
"The law requires actual evidence of intentional wrongdoing," Rahmani explained. "At worst, election officials made a mistake in printing the ballots, but those mistaken ballots were still counted. That type of harmless error is not enough to meet the high bar necessary to overturn an election."
More at link
Archae
(47,245 posts)Kari Lake is going to continue throwing her tantrum, all the way to the Supreme Court if she can.
She said herself that only if she won she would accept the results.
SoCalDavidS
(10,599 posts)Lawyers are working on the Appeal right now, I'm sure.
The lawyers must be ecstatic. They're going to profit from an utterly ridiculous case.
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,897 posts)The water is POISONED....
louis-t
(24,618 posts)a MAGA judge willing to sell out.
SoCalDavidS
(10,599 posts)TFG went 0-70 in his cases contesting 2020 election.
louis-t
(24,618 posts)Even the ones he appointed and ones appointed by other republicans. "You have to have an allegation, then you have to have proof. You have neither."
Celerity
(54,410 posts)snip
Of the 15 cases in Drozs spreadsheet, three were filed on or after Election Day. None of them involved allegations of voter fraud.
And of those three, just one case, filed Nov. 4, had to do with the election results. It centered on reducing the amount of time Pennsylvania voters had to fix errors on their mail-in ballots. The Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee were granted an injunction against the secretary of state to prevent extending the proof of ID period by three days. The matter involved a small number of ballots that didnt change the outcome.
"Trump won one case in the post-election and lost 64," said Marc Elias, a partner at the Perkins Coie law firm who has represented Democrats in the lawsuits.
Trump has not prevailed in any cases that allege voter fraud or seek to overturn the election results.
fantase56
(495 posts)She cannot catch a break,
Too bad shes such a snake
.
FakeNoose
(41,637 posts)The only other solution would have been for her to post a bond for the court costs in advance.
That's what they should do for her next worthless lawsuit.