Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne Democratic House member voted against the $1.7 trillion spending bill.
Governing is hard. Meaningless gestures are easy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2298 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One Democratic House member voted against the $1.7 trillion spending bill. (Original Post)
Tomconroy
Dec 2022
OP
At least this bill actually had funding for DHS, unlike the 2019 bill to reopen the government
betsuni
Dec 2022
#1
Her District, Her City and Her State will all get important programs funded under the bill
bottomofthehill
Dec 2022
#5
betsuni
(27,272 posts)1. At least this bill actually had funding for DHS, unlike the 2019 bill to reopen the government
the same one Democratic member voted against with the reason it funded ICE when it didn't.
mahina
(18,971 posts)2. Please not Ed Case. Please not Ed Case.
Please not Ed Case.
padah513
(2,675 posts)3. AOC
dem4decades
(11,944 posts)4. She's a real team player.
bottomofthehill
(8,846 posts)5. Her District, Her City and Her State will all get important programs funded under the bill
Along with a host of other important additions among them voting protections. Every member could find something they did not like in the bill but it takes a village. Fortunately, all of her constituents will still receive the benefits of the Bill without her support
There was also a second democratic profile in courage, a Present vote that will also get all of the benefits of the Omnibus. Thankfully some of the retiring Republicans decided to vote for it to ensure enough votes.
myohmy2
(3,572 posts)6. maybe...
...she's running for president...
...
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,793 posts)7. And Tlaib (D-MI) voted "present" ...
... whatever the hell "present" means.
Great representation from the so-called squad.