General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhere did the wealth go?
Was it always an estimation?
"Americas richest lost $660 billion collectively in 2022 Elon Musk lost the most"
If they lost the money. Where is it now?
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/27/elon-musk-lost-the-most-money-of-all-americas-billionaires-in-2022.html
drray23
(8,825 posts)So, if this goes down, the estimated wealth does as well even though no money was exchanged. I guess some of the money not invested in these stocks may have been parked in bonds or other safer investment vehicles.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)A lot of that reported wealth was the value of stock holdings based on dropping share prices.
Consider the Great Depression. The lost value in the Stock Market crash didn't "go" somewhere; it just disappeared.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)It's just been weighed in the balance, and everyone who agreed that the maguffin was worth a whole lot of money in days gone by now agrees that it's worth $660 billion less today.
I still marvel at the notion of short-selling, where a loss of value in a stock can be monetized by an astute and daring trader.
multigraincracker
(38,063 posts)We need a maximum wage.
bucolic_frolic
(55,857 posts)Money "grows" as stock markets rise the same as the Fed creating money for loans and fractional reserve banking. You bring in a dollar, you lend 90 cents of it. Now there's $1.90 in circulation.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)MichMan
(17,405 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(24,130 posts)You still own the same number of shares, theyre just not worth as much as they used to be.
Check back this time next year.
IbogaProject
(6,078 posts)Stock losses.
PurgedVoter
(2,721 posts)Someone with contacts and money could have seen this coming and decided it was worth the investment.
zipplewrath
(16,698 posts)Despite what people are saying here, it went to those who "sold short". They gained money because other people lost it. That's not all of it in any sense and as people are saying, in some sense it is "value" of something that was only realized if you sold it at the time that the value was at that level. But in the end the entire system from top to bottom is predicated on "winners and losers".
Igel
(37,614 posts)But it's the same with houses.
My mother asked the same question when her house dropped from $260k to $160k. "Who stole my money?" Had a lot of trouble explaining it to her. She never had the money, it's what somebody though others would pay based on comparables. Stocks are a bit different, since they're fungible, right?
But the principle's the same.
Shermann
(9,073 posts)If you get something like a run on the banks, the mirage disappears
Bettie
(19,887 posts)more money than they can spend in 10 lifetimes. Boo hoo.
KentuckyWoman
(7,417 posts)I think they need to check their jacket pockets.
That's where I find most of my lost things.
It only matters when you need it. For billionaires that's generally never. For the vast majority of people like me filling the gap between living and social security - with a little bit in the market that took me lifetime to cobble together it can matter an awful lot.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.