General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (milestogo) on Mon Jan 9, 2023, 09:25 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
patricia92243
(12,975 posts)ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)He's not "very disturbed."
Buckeyeblue
(6,352 posts)That's why it's a stupid institution. I don't understand why the British people tolerate it. Not that it's any of my business...my tax dollars don't support it.
Baltimike
(4,441 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)Prince Harry sensationally puts some of the blame for his Nazi uniform scandal on his brother, Prince William, and his sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, in his new memoir.
Page Six reports the Duke of Sussex will claim the Prince and Princess of Wales howled with laughter when they saw him dressed up for the 2005 party.
Harry was 20 years old when The Sun newspaper published a front-page photo of him dressed as a Nazi soldier with a red armband emblazoned with a big swastika.
The picture was taken at a costume party with a Native and Colonial theme, where William was also a guest and was dressed in a homemade lion outfit.
snip

dflprincess
(29,341 posts)I agree with the poster above, he isn't well and needs to get help.
Celerity
(54,407 posts)The vast majority of hatred in the UK for Harry and Meghan comes from deep British racism. I grew up in London, so am well aware of this British racism, especially as I am a mixed race PoC myself.
I also am a hardcore republican (anti-monarchist, NOT, of course the US Rethug party) and think it all should be scrapped.
MustLoveBeagles
(16,403 posts)It's an archeaic system that warps and twists people and Im not referring to Harry. You couldn't pay me to live in that gilded cage.
Raine
(31,177 posts)I'm sick to death of the constant public whining and complaining.
Demovictory9
(37,113 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)that a lot of the british hatred is born in racism (and anti american resentment and classism). I also am a republican in the sense of monarchies. Royalty is dumb. (But I am an american and it's not my battle.)
Despite that, I think Harry is coming across as pretty messy right now. I appreciate the trainwreck, as it's fun to gawk at. It's damaging the royals, too, and their reputation, so I support it all. lol
But, Harry does seem to have some personal reckoning to do. The speaking of his kills in afghanistan is problematic. Blaming Will and Kate for his nazi costume is lack of ownership of his own decisions. He's behaving like a child still. Stunted growth.
Honestly, people hate Meghan, but I"m not quite sure what she even sees in him.
(Meghan and Kate are the two people I don't despise in the whole family -- maybe Anne, too--... and they also happen to be the two who weren't born into royalty and the two who are always pitted against each other.)
DenaliDemocrat
(1,777 posts)Id wager ALL of them could be considered victims if they felt like it
Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)Diana, for all her good and bad qualities, was open about her flaws and frailties. Of course, much of it was curated in the media at the time, but part of the reason she was so relatable is because her problems were relatable.
This is just Privilege: The Why Everything Is Everyone Else's Fault Tour.
I keep wondering who his friends are. He's not far from me in age, and I just cannot imagine anyone at all in my life not taking me aside at some point and going, "What the fuck are you doing?"
I get that it's all about the $$$ (this "truth" they keep wanting to tell seems peppered with an awful lot of verified lies).
But damn. He's just burning his whole life and family up. And for what? Americans are not nearly as interested in the two of them as they seem to think we are. Yeah, we're rubber-necking now - it's great soap opera drama. (I fully expect a story about how someone pushed someone else down the stairs at some point while everyone wore dresses with shoulder pads).
But it isn't sustainable. Everyone's already getting kind of bored with it. His book will come out, there will be some chatter, then what? What will they have to offer? Because so far they've offered family drama. That material's going to run out eventually.
Their divorce is going to be epic, tho. Oh, it's coming.
milestogo
(23,082 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 9, 2023, 12:46 AM - Edit history (1)
The thing is, I had no idea who Meghan Markle was when he became engaged to her. She's not much of a celebrity, and she seemed to think that marrying a "prince" was going to enhance her celebrity.
Their whole romance was calculated to sell as a fairy tale. I don't care and I don't buy it. But I do hate to see anyone self-destruct on the world stage, and to me it seems like that's what Harry is doing.
Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)I don't expect one any time soon. Give it five to ten years when their celebrity has waned and they have nothing else to sell the public - because the only thing they have to sell is this royal drama. I've seen nothing to suggest anyone would be interested in anything else they do.
He's going to get thrown under the bus so fast. It'll be all allegations of mental illness due to unresolved grief over Diana or whatever.
And he'll be sitting there with no one except the hangers on.
It's really depressing. His mother's death messed him up something fierce. Which is understandable. I think Markle wanted the celebrity gold ring and pushed all his sensitive buttons ("Oh, golly, I never knew anything about Diana!" *cough* bullshit *cough*). And he's got all kinds of resentments bubbling out now.
And this isn't a defense of the royals. They're their own mess. Until Andrew is catapulted into the moon, I see them as complicit. And that's scratching the surface. That's just what we know about.
I think the most fascinating thing in all this is the total abject lack of self-awareness. I'm always interested when people lack it, but these two are operating on a level that is just epic. They really have no inkling of how they're perceived. Even with the people who take their side. Sympathy is not admiration nor a promise to support them in future projects. It's just sympathy as the ooze leaks out.
Ah well. People make their choices. He's making his.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)My God.
milestogo
(23,082 posts)By saying she's not much of a celebrity?
BuddhaGirl
(3,708 posts)That's some Daily Mail b.s. you're offering here LOL
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)If you believe that, maybe Trump should stand up and say Biden told him to order the Jan 6th insurrection. 🙄
Notice Kate and Will have never worn a Nazi uniform. Harry did. But of course Harry has an excuse for why nothing is every his fault.
SharonClark
(10,497 posts)can write what he wants even though many ex-soldiers would never talk about their kill count.
Its evident that the retired Colonel is in the antiHarry camp for more than talking about his military service in his memoir. His comments go way beyond criticizing Harrys memoir.
I cant believe I am defending a Royal 😗.
RockRaven
(19,373 posts)Disturbance abounds.
CountAllVotes
(22,215 posts).
PlutosHeart
(1,445 posts)That way there is no competition to balance anything out.
It is somewhat recognized that even though the Royals do not make policy, they have been able to urge reason sometimes.
Harry is serving their needs and not that of his country. For this reason, I see him as a pawn to them and to the media for $$$. In essence he is now his mother.
I have no clue to his relationship with Megan but it is suspect that he is seemingly suffering and she might not be helping the situation.
IbogaProject
(5,913 posts)I'm not buying any PR bs that spoiled brat is selling until he speaks against the Crown and suggests forfeiting their illgotten wealth. Not like any bellyaching is going to bring back the millions killed in the name of the Crown.
Deuxcents
(26,915 posts)That they dont know how the real world is? Are they stuck in pomp n thousand year old ceremonies that have no social graces in current affairs? Just curious..
milestogo
(23,082 posts)but they are also a corporation which makes it worse. They approach marriage like they are breeding racehorses.
I feel sorry for Harry, as the loss of his mother seems to have really scarred him. I think there are very few women who could successfully marry into this family. But I don't think the public airing of grievances is going to help them at all.
CountAllVotes
(22,215 posts)How many people did you kill in the war Daddy? No answer.
He was a proud sergeant in the U.S. Marine Corps.
He did not need to nor care to answer!
milestogo
(23,082 posts)Countries engage in wars. Individuals serve their countries.
Raine
(31,177 posts)father if he killed anyone in the war.
Right away my mother jumped in and said "don't ever ask him that again"! I never did and I'm sorry to this day ever asked.
CountAllVotes
(22,215 posts)How would you know? You didn't so forget it!
As for this Harry idiot, that's what he is, an idiot.
Comparing killing living human beings to tokens in a chess game tells one all they need to know about this freak. ugh!
Hekate
(100,133 posts)But youre all grown up now and can look up books like:
Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character
By Jonathan Shay, MD, PhD
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)I like my two daughters thinking of me as a goofy, happy-go-lucky, and rarely overly serious person.
My largest fear when I first became a father was what would my kids think of me if/when they found out about my military service. Would they look at me like some sort of monster?
At 12 and 14, my two daughters know bits and pieces about my service and they certainly see the impact it has had on me. My fear of being viewed as a monster has been somewhat abated, but I still dont know if either of them have pieced together that Ive probably killed people.
Happy Hoosier
(9,535 posts)Harry was in a helicopter. He had some distance from the enemy. It's a little easier to establish an emotional distance.
I will say my grandpa didn't seem to mind talking about his war stories. He 'sanitized' them to some extent, but he didn't shy away from talking about how brutal it was, even when I was a kid.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)I have a strong memory of when I asked my father this question when I was a child.
I did not expect the look of pure anguish that crossed my father's face, before he said, "I hope none."
I always felt a little bit ashamed of putting my father in that position. He was a humanist and the realities of war were painful to him.
I never repeated such inquiries.
LeftInTX
(34,293 posts)His model had little bomb pics with a bomb for each raid
SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)RobinA
(10,478 posts)in the past, but they do need to shut up. Many of the comments about Meghan have been totally uncalled for and I get their distress on that end, but they are now making things worse for themselves.
treestar
(82,383 posts)and it's their fault?
Why shut up if you think things are important enough to be said. Whether you just want your side heard or whether you think maybe you should speak against racism, or whatever else he mentions?
NCjack
(10,297 posts)Raine
(31,177 posts)California, too much about them on the local "news".
PlutosHeart
(1,445 posts)blm
(114,658 posts)Guys with high kill numbers even become famous.
Chris Kyle was known for
..?
Skittles
(171,709 posts)thank you
blm
(114,658 posts)But, I couldnt act my way out of a paper bag even if there was a paycheck for it. 🤓
3Hotdogs
(15,368 posts)L.T.C.s (landing troop carriers). If you want to get a sense of what that was, watch the beginning of "Letters From Iwo Jima." It is Japanese footage showing about a hundred of boats in the water an splashes all around them. The splashes were Japanese artillery shells, trying to sink those boats.
He never talked about Iwo Jima. The only military experience he ever talked about was his time on Pearl Harbor, before the war. That was when he got "busted" for being in a bar fight and got time in the brig.
blm
(114,658 posts)But, he was always jumpy at sudden noises, like if we dropped a schoolbook. 😢
beaglelover
(4,466 posts)At least he was brave enough to go fight for his country over there unlike his brother.
milestogo
(23,082 posts)if its perceived as bragging.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Interesting.
milestogo
(23,082 posts)chowder66
(12,241 posts)person who goes through something like this has their own way of contextualizing or dealing with it. He seems to be confronting it in my opinion.
Link to tweet
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Cha
(319,070 posts)Usually is more to the story.
I support Harry & Meghan.. not the British Tabloid's version of Hate and Racism.
Bettie
(19,704 posts)it really does make a difference.
treestar
(82,383 posts)than disturbed.
It sounds like he's holding himself accountable based on what he was trained to do but making sure he doesn't bury it accounting for his actions. He seems like he takes self-inventory pretty seriously.
SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)For some reason that was important to him to put out there.
I suspect Harry knew exactly what he was doing with this section of his book -- humble brag.
MustLoveBeagles
(16,403 posts)I would've taken a very dim view of bragging but that's not what I'm seeing here. This is his way of dealing with his combat experience. Like you said everyone deals with things differently. I honestly don't get what the fuss is about.
I don't think these disclousures puts any more of a target on him than is there already.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Are very wth.
Wingus Dingus
(9,173 posts)with mentally and emotionally.
Aussie105
(7,920 posts)Most of us live in a world where you occasionally bump your head against reality and make adjustments accordingly.
Royalty and their offspring never do. They grow up without shaping their personalities to fit in with the real world.
Harry met Meghan and now lives in the real world.
A bit of psychotherapy might help make the transition.
But seriously - this book should have been run through a small audience while in draft form to see which bits went down well, and which bits didn't.
Memoirs get edited for good reasons.
Skittles
(171,709 posts)they live in their own world, where they are the center of the universe
Blue_playwright
(1,620 posts)I wish he had ONLY done the book. No interviews. No documentary (even though I enjoyed it).
Just write the book, set your opinion/experience in history. Let it ride.
Cha
(319,070 posts)they did it.
DET
(2,499 posts)I felt really sorry for Harry while I was watching that interview. I had no idea that the death of his mother had screwed him up so badly (seems obvious that it would, but both brothers appeared to be pretty stoic after her death). Then he married someone who had her own family baggage. Plus they had to deal with the racism against Megan. Yes, theyre wealthy and privileged, but theyre still human beings. I hope their marriage lasts, but they are facing a lot of challenges, including potential financial difficulties in the future.
Skittles
(171,709 posts)all the veterans I have ever known, NONE of them would use their war experience for attention
I am truly sick of Harry and Meghan
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Some of the responses here are just.....
You didn't even read what Harry actually said.
kskiska
(27,165 posts)On Oprah he stated that someone in the RF questioned what color Archie's skin would be. Now he denies any racism at all on the part of the family, per his interview with Tom Bradby. Plus, he stands by Lady Hussey, Lady in Waiting, who left her job after a so-called racist interchange.
eShirl
(20,257 posts)msongs
(73,753 posts)yet he has refused to actually go. maybe its the money
Hekate
(100,133 posts)She arranged that her estate as a Spencer should go to him, because his older brother was going to get the kingdom in the fullness of time, and as the younger brother, Harry wasnt going to get much in the way of an independent life.
His whole job in life was to be there in case William died before having his own heirs. Must feel swell, being the spare.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)
a soldier in a war is ordered to kill? Well, war is disturbing that way. Does it disturb you that he compartmentalized the experience ( chess pieces ) in order to psychologically survive? Well, trauma survivors everywhere report that experience.
You can find the books and articles if you look for them -- just go digging for American veterans of the Vietnam War. Go further back to the poets of WWI. It doesnt take a whole lot of research to find the literature.
Well said.
milestogo
(23,082 posts)He's not Joe Nobody. He's a Prince of England. Like it or not, he is a public figure, and by talking kill numbers he is making himself and his family, and the royal family, a Taliban target.
Its counter-intuitive for someone who is worried about their security situation to go around talking about how many Afghans he killed.
treestar
(82,383 posts)to claim being stoic is the way to go.
The same people would say don't shy away from the ugly parts of US history, Native Americans and their sufferings.
No we are careful to "support the troops" due to Vietnam syndrome (the claim people spit on them). So that does not include them talking about what it actually involves?
JI7
(93,615 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)milestogo
(23,082 posts)You're not reading the whole discussion, just pounding your drum over and over.
BuddhaGirl
(3,708 posts)and projecting about Harry's marriage, actions, intentions etc. are doing.
Neither you nor I know the truth of it all.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)by Jonathan Shay, MD, PhD
RobinA
(10,478 posts)It is an excellent book and covers a lot of ground you don't usually hear about. Even in trauma circles.
blue cat
(2,454 posts)The far right are the ones that usually support the monarchy. I think its shameful for people saying the should shut up as they flap their gums. He has every right to defend himself since everyone seems to not be able to shut up about telling them to shut up.
RobinA
(10,478 posts)but I am telling them to shut-up. They are making things difficult for themselves by keeping themselves in the spotlight they say they want out of.
BuddhaGirl
(3,708 posts)wanting "privacy" as a reason for bailing out of being working royals.
It was more about not feeling supported by their family and the horrible attacks by the press.
orleans
(36,918 posts)betsuni
(29,078 posts)is a big secret, a huge shock, nobody knew this about the job.
Like how lawyers represent guilty criminals and how medical professionals see disgusting things without getting grossed out and running away, how anybody working with the general public has to be polite. It's the job.
Also, from the responses here about this and a lot of things, the idea that every motivation for everything is money is stupid.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)What do people think combat troops did in the Middle East?
My Infantry platoon killed 46 people that I know of when I was in Iraq and wounded many more.
Years back, I made the mistake of getting a BSM license plate (bronze star medal). When I went to the DMV to pick it up, people in line asked me what I did to get that medal. I told them simply I killed a bunch of people. They stood there with their mouths open and shut up really quick after that. As an infantryman, I wasnt sent to Iraq to shake hands and play nice with the insurgents.
Honestly, did they expect me to give them some inspiring story that would leave them feeling a sense of glory and positivity?
Its easy to judge people whove been in combat if youve never experienced it or its direct impacts. War brings out the worst in people.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)harder for the next veteran to talk about it, and establishes a false reverence about combat itself.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Many of the responses in this thread are wtaf.
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)I haven't watched the documentary, I don't follow Harry or Megan or the royals: would it be better if he had not kept track of the damage and carnage he had caused as a soldier? Let's be honest about what soldiers (at war) are trained to do. If the 25 number is correct, it means that each kill had an impact on him, and that he made a conscious decision to remember. His actions during the war still weigh on him.
And regarding the criticism of not keeping the information to himself. What's wrong with being transparent? If he killed 25 people during a war, that's what happened. Being honest about it will at least make lawmakers think twice before engaging in wars. Just my opinion, of course.
pinkstarburst
(2,020 posts)is that whether or not some vets talk about kills and some do not, Harry is no ordinary vet. He's not some regular joe who did his service and now works as a high school math teacher living in rural Indiana.
Harry and Meghan were both very worried about the status of their security and the safety of their children long before the memoir was released. They no longer have UK police protection, nor should they given that they are no longer working royals. Given what recently happened with Salman Rushdie, it is incredibly stupid of Harry to include something like this in his book. It makes him more of a target. It makes his children and wife targets. It increases the threat towards his security detail, which is a selfish thing to do just to sell a book. I am horrified that someone who claims to love his wife and children would do this.
This, and all the other things in the book have not made me respect or sympathize with Harry. They have made me realize the degree to which Harry is seriously mentally ill.
milestogo
(23,082 posts)That is what I find disturbing.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Like the Taliban has nothing better to do than petty revenge on individuals? To the extent they exist as the same people? And that they don't love death more than life and all that jazz?
Rushdie was much more of a target - it was for a specific, non-war act. Interesting that a book upset the fanatical Muslims more than any killing.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)they are born that way and are stuck with the media being fascinated with them.
Even marrying one may be because they fell in love with somebody, so it's not always particularly that person's choice to be excoriated in the media all the time.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)and drop those silly titles that go with all that privilege while they're at it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)Some people can talk about it, some can't. It says little about them.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)Including their kills - they were pilots and actually painted the number of dead enemy combatants on their planes. They had made peace with their service and discussed it openly.
One was special forces and was in service for 6 years in some of the worst hotspots in the world. He has severe PTSD and cant talk about it. At all.
I dont think you can extrapolate anything from what a soldier says about their experience. Each one processes it differently and tbh, you suck for judging