Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueWaveNeverEnd

(7,930 posts)
Mon Jan 9, 2023, 09:45 PM Jan 2023

'Fantastic': George Santos says he's happy about vote to gut Office of Congressional Ethics

On Monday, Business Insider reported that scandal-plagued Rep. George Santos (R-NY) is enthusiastically and openly on board with Republican plans to gut the Office of Congressional Ethics.


"I think it's fantastic," Santos told reporter Bryan Metzger, when asked if he was in favor of the rule changes. "It's a good thing for transparency, it's a good thing for Americans."

"The Office of Congressional Ethics, first established in 2008, is a quasi-independent body tasked with investigating allegations of misconduct against members of Congress," reported Metzger. "It then makes a determination as to whether those allegations are worth investigating further, at which point it makes a referral to the House Ethics Committee, which is evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats."


-------------------

"The rules package for the 118th Congress, put forward by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, re-imposes eight-year term limits for the OCE's board members, made up of former members of Congress, that were originally laid out when the office was established in 2008 and later extended in subsequent congresses," said the report, noting this will expel three of four Democratic members and potentially leave those seats vacant for months. "Furthermore, the rules prevent the office from hiring new staff after one month and require four board members to sign off on any staffing decision. That means the office — which currently has just one investigative counsel on staff and is actively seeking to hire two more — likely won't have enough time to hire new staff, and will not be able to fill any vacancies that might occur in the next two years."

Santos brushed aside these concerns, claiming that the old way just "gives them more power."

https://www.rawstory.com/george-santos-2659091142/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Fantastic': George Santos says he's happy about vote to gut Office of Congressional Ethics (Original Post) BlueWaveNeverEnd Jan 2023 OP
I bet he is. TheBlackAdder Jan 2023 #1
Can someone explain how defunding the OCE is good for transparency? LonePirate Jan 2023 #2
That was my question. rsdsharp Jan 2023 #4
The best sociopaths don't break laws, they make them. Irish_Dem Jan 2023 #3
Former Supreme Court Justice Santos KentuckyWoman Jan 2023 #5
Lol. I'll just bet he is Arkansas Granny Jan 2023 #6
Gaslighting. onecaliberal Jan 2023 #7
Maybe rambler_american Jan 2023 #8
MAGA Poster Boy Kid Berwyn Jan 2023 #9
wearing a $30K watch. wonder where he got the money for it. BlueWaveNeverEnd Jan 2023 #12
I'll bet he is and so will Gym Jim, MTG and most ot the republican house members republianmushroom Jan 2023 #10
First time I have believed him. twodogsbarking Jan 2023 #11
Lol, yes. What a time for them for him to be so obviously and noisily honest. Hortensis Jan 2023 #14
Ethics? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2023 #13

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
5. Former Supreme Court Justice Santos
Mon Jan 9, 2023, 10:02 PM
Jan 2023

I doubt he'll stay in Congress very long. I hear he's the first Somoan Sikh in the House of Medici to discover a cure for stupidity. Johnson & Johnson is teaming up with RJ Reynolds to turn it into a powder to add in Ritz crackers.

rambler_american

(789 posts)
8. Maybe
Tue Jan 10, 2023, 10:11 AM
Jan 2023

if someone would kindly explain to Santos ad others what "ethics" means it might help. I don'[t think they have an inkling what ethics are.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Fantastic': George Santo...