General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, this, this is what the cult voted for (cuts to social security and medicare)
Good luck with that shit, you fucking morons. Guess you like being in the minority and want to go back in 2024. Also, turn in your fucking long tab, Waltz, you worthless oxygen thief. Also, also, NOT FUCKING ENTITLEMENTS. Earned.
Republicans Signal Cuts To Social Security, Medicare With New House Majority
Louse Republicans are making clear that they intend to seek cuts to entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare with their new majority in the 118th Congress.
Their plans to target health care programs follow demands from a group of conservatives that helped elect House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) over the weekend. Those far-right lawmakers have sought across-the-board spending cuts in order to tackle the growing national debt.
But the narrow House GOP majority ― McCarthy can afford to lose just four votes on any bill ― is far more divided on cuts to defense spending than for entitlement programs.
Im all for a balanced budget, but were not going to do it on the backs of our troops and our military, Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Fla.), a former Army Green Beret, said Monday during an interview on Fox Business. If we really want to talk about the debt and spending, its the entitlements programs.
Ocelot II
(115,713 posts)"We'll do it on the backs of the poor and the elderly and the disabled instead."
Aviation Pro
(12,169 posts)Fucking morons are like the slowest kid in the school, who takes a dare and sticks his tongue on a frozen lamppost.
Or in this case a third rail.
ret5hd
(20,491 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,814 posts)Tax cuts for the rich are a well-established entitlement program.
bamagal62
(3,258 posts)Infuriates me. Why do we allow them to use it?
We pay into that our whole lives. Its earned fair and square.
Thank you
emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)FSogol
(45,487 posts)From the dictionary: the state or condition of being entitled : right. : a right to benefits specified especially by law or contract. : belief that one is deserving of or entitled to certain privileges.
The Federal classification: A Federal program or provision of law that requires payments to any person or unit of government that meets the eligibility criteria established by law. Entitlements constitute a binding obligation on the part of the Federal Government, and eligible recipients have legal recourse if the obligation is not fulfilled.
Conservatives try to conflate the various meanings to pretend that social security isn't something we paid for, but something we unjustly expect.
WarGamer
(12,445 posts)WarGamer
(12,445 posts)This means that workers, employers and the self-employed pay for the benefits with their Social
Security taxes. The taxes that are collected are put into special trust funds. You qualify for
these benefits based on your work history (or your spouse or parent). The amount of the benefit
is based on these earnings.
LakeArenal
(28,819 posts)EarlG
(21,949 posts)All they're doing is reminding voters that Republicans want to push granny off a cliff (again).
newdayneeded
(1,955 posts)my retirement take a total shit over the last year is beyond depressing.
FakeNoose
(32,639 posts)None of us should be surprised, we were all told what they planned to do.
MiniMe
(21,716 posts)You want to know where all the $$ is going, look there first
WarGamer
(12,445 posts)blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)I hope they make every one of theses assholes say it out loud so every one will know who voted for it.
WarGamer
(12,445 posts)What we have been very clear about is, were not going to touch the benefits that are going to people relying on the benefits under Social Security and Medicare, Roy said Sunday on CNNs State of the Union. But we all have to be honest about sitting at the table and figuring out how were going to make those work, how were going to deal with defense spending and how were going to deal with nondefense discretionary spending.
The Republican Study Committee proposed a budget for fiscal 2023 that would gradually increase the eligibility ages for Social Security and Medicare, and change the Social Security benefit formula for people 54 and younger, while not changing it for people closer to receiving benefits.
FSogol
(45,487 posts)WarGamer
(12,445 posts)The electoral backlash would be complete.
We're talking 435 Seat DEM House.
FSogol
(45,487 posts)Why trust their good nature? :WTF:
https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/news/republican-house-conservatives-threaten-debt-limit-default-to-cut-social-programs/
All of the GOP fucks listed in this article are attempting to cut social security. It is disingenuous to pretend that isn't happening. Means testing it is a crap idea. Despite playing with the definitions of entitlements, social security is something people paid into. Taking it away is wrong. You are also moving the goal posts by inserting the "currently receiving."
WarGamer
(12,445 posts)I'm explaining WHY it's not going to happen, certainly NOT defending anyone.
Call it a flaw of mine, but I'm an INTP-T and I'm somewhat OCD about terms and definitions and clarity... I'm the last person in the world to let emotions rule my gray matter.
Sorry if I gave you the wrong impression.
Captain_New_York
(161 posts)Tell Michael Waltz ( future Colonel US Army retired) that his retirement and VA benefits are by his definition entitlements and should be on the chopping block
WarGamer
(12,445 posts)LakeArenal
(28,819 posts)They are movin in.